Epigraphs Note on Terminology Acknowledgments Introduction
Epigraphs Note on Terminology Acknowledgments Introduction
Epigraphs Note on Terminology Acknowledgments Introduction
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5. From 1925 to 1958 Kehoe was the medical director of the Ethyl Corporati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
the partnership between Standard and General Motors that distributed the<br />
DuP<strong>on</strong>t-manufactured antiknock gasoline additive known as tetra ethyl lead<br />
(TEL). In 1966 he told C<strong>on</strong>gress that he “had been looking for 30 years for evidence<br />
of bad effects from leaded gasoline in the general populati<strong>on</strong> and had<br />
found n<strong>on</strong>e.” Kitman, “The Secret History of Lead.” Kehoe’s work would take<br />
him to Germany immediately after World War II, from which he sent home<br />
photographs of the Nazi death camps. See also diary, RAK Collecti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
The German industrial c<strong>on</strong>glomerate I. G. Farben had operated the<br />
Auschwitz camp with Hitler’s SS. Before the war Farben had partnered in<br />
Germany and the United States with Standard Oil. Shortly before European<br />
hostilities broke out, Ethyl Corporati<strong>on</strong> transferred the technology for making<br />
TEL to its German partner, greatly aiding the Nazi war effort. According<br />
to Farben official August v<strong>on</strong> Knieriem at the Nuremberg war crimes<br />
trial, “Without tetraethyl lead the present method of warfare would have<br />
been impossible. The fact that since the beginning of the war we could produce<br />
tetraethyl lead is entirely due to the circumstance that shortly before,<br />
the Americans presented us with the producti<strong>on</strong> plans, complete with their<br />
know how.” J. Borkin, The Crime and Punishment of I. G. Farben (New York:<br />
The Free Press, 1978), p. 78.<br />
6. On April 17, 1952, Kehoe wrote to Seward Miller—medical director of the<br />
Divisi<strong>on</strong> of Industrial Hygiene, Public Health Service—<strong>on</strong> behalf of nine<br />
corporati<strong>on</strong>s then sp<strong>on</strong>soring his fluoride research, to request that the<br />
PHS perform some fluoride safety studies <strong>on</strong> animals. The industry groups,<br />
Kehoe noted, “are c<strong>on</strong>cerned mainly with the results of exposure to fluorides<br />
in various occupati<strong>on</strong>s.” These industries included “The Pennsylvania<br />
Salt Manufacturing Company, Aluminum Company of America, Reynolds<br />
Metals Company, Universal Oil Products Company, American Petroleum<br />
Institute, Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporati<strong>on</strong>, Tennessee Valley<br />
Authority, The Harshaw Chemical Company, [and] Minnesota Mining and<br />
Manufacturing Corporati<strong>on</strong>.” RAK Collecti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
7. A great number of claims were settled out of court. The following is a partial<br />
listing of legal acti<strong>on</strong>s against U.S. corporati<strong>on</strong>s following the war, and<br />
during the early cold war, in which fluoride was suspected as a pois<strong>on</strong>.<br />
These data are culled from press accounts and this author’s research. See<br />
also E. J. Largent, “Fluorosis—The Health Aspects of Fluorine Compounds,”<br />
for the difficulty of comprehensively tracking the frequency and number<br />
of fluoride lawsuits. Also, M. J. Prival and F. Fisher, “Fluorides in the Air,”<br />
Envir<strong>on</strong>ment, vol. 15, no. 3 (April 1973), pp. 25–32. “The number of out of<br />
court settlements of claims of fluoride damage to vegetati<strong>on</strong> is impossible<br />
to determine, although it certainly exceeds the number of court-ordered<br />
payments.”<br />
• 1946. The “Peach Crop Cases” by New Jersey farmers in Gloucester<br />
and Salem County, claiming $430,000 against DuP<strong>on</strong>t and the U.S.<br />
government.