26.10.2014 Views

Epigraphs Note on Terminology Acknowledgments Introduction

Epigraphs Note on Terminology Acknowledgments Introduction

Epigraphs Note on Terminology Acknowledgments Introduction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5. From 1925 to 1958 Kehoe was the medical director of the Ethyl Corporati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

the partnership between Standard and General Motors that distributed the<br />

DuP<strong>on</strong>t-manufactured antiknock gasoline additive known as tetra ethyl lead<br />

(TEL). In 1966 he told C<strong>on</strong>gress that he “had been looking for 30 years for evidence<br />

of bad effects from leaded gasoline in the general populati<strong>on</strong> and had<br />

found n<strong>on</strong>e.” Kitman, “The Secret History of Lead.” Kehoe’s work would take<br />

him to Germany immediately after World War II, from which he sent home<br />

photographs of the Nazi death camps. See also diary, RAK Collecti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

The German industrial c<strong>on</strong>glomerate I. G. Farben had operated the<br />

Auschwitz camp with Hitler’s SS. Before the war Farben had partnered in<br />

Germany and the United States with Standard Oil. Shortly before European<br />

hostilities broke out, Ethyl Corporati<strong>on</strong> transferred the technology for making<br />

TEL to its German partner, greatly aiding the Nazi war effort. According<br />

to Farben official August v<strong>on</strong> Knieriem at the Nuremberg war crimes<br />

trial, “Without tetraethyl lead the present method of warfare would have<br />

been impossible. The fact that since the beginning of the war we could produce<br />

tetraethyl lead is entirely due to the circumstance that shortly before,<br />

the Americans presented us with the producti<strong>on</strong> plans, complete with their<br />

know how.” J. Borkin, The Crime and Punishment of I. G. Farben (New York:<br />

The Free Press, 1978), p. 78.<br />

6. On April 17, 1952, Kehoe wrote to Seward Miller—medical director of the<br />

Divisi<strong>on</strong> of Industrial Hygiene, Public Health Service—<strong>on</strong> behalf of nine<br />

corporati<strong>on</strong>s then sp<strong>on</strong>soring his fluoride research, to request that the<br />

PHS perform some fluoride safety studies <strong>on</strong> animals. The industry groups,<br />

Kehoe noted, “are c<strong>on</strong>cerned mainly with the results of exposure to fluorides<br />

in various occupati<strong>on</strong>s.” These industries included “The Pennsylvania<br />

Salt Manufacturing Company, Aluminum Company of America, Reynolds<br />

Metals Company, Universal Oil Products Company, American Petroleum<br />

Institute, Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporati<strong>on</strong>, Tennessee Valley<br />

Authority, The Harshaw Chemical Company, [and] Minnesota Mining and<br />

Manufacturing Corporati<strong>on</strong>.” RAK Collecti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

7. A great number of claims were settled out of court. The following is a partial<br />

listing of legal acti<strong>on</strong>s against U.S. corporati<strong>on</strong>s following the war, and<br />

during the early cold war, in which fluoride was suspected as a pois<strong>on</strong>.<br />

These data are culled from press accounts and this author’s research. See<br />

also E. J. Largent, “Fluorosis—The Health Aspects of Fluorine Compounds,”<br />

for the difficulty of comprehensively tracking the frequency and number<br />

of fluoride lawsuits. Also, M. J. Prival and F. Fisher, “Fluorides in the Air,”<br />

Envir<strong>on</strong>ment, vol. 15, no. 3 (April 1973), pp. 25–32. “The number of out of<br />

court settlements of claims of fluoride damage to vegetati<strong>on</strong> is impossible<br />

to determine, although it certainly exceeds the number of court-ordered<br />

payments.”<br />

• 1946. The “Peach Crop Cases” by New Jersey farmers in Gloucester<br />

and Salem County, claiming $430,000 against DuP<strong>on</strong>t and the U.S.<br />

government.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!