27.10.2014 Views

Download - Dental Asia

Download - Dental Asia

Download - Dental Asia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CLINICALUPDATE<br />

of standards, and to strive to succeed. The need for power is<br />

the need to make others behave in a way that they would not<br />

have behaved otherwise. The need for affiliation is the desire<br />

for friendly and close interpersonal relationships. A person’s<br />

levels of these three needs are typically measured by reacting<br />

to a set of pictures included in the Thematic Apperception Test.<br />

Predictions about motivation can be made from a study of the<br />

three-needs theory. McClelland found that high achievers<br />

differentiate themselves from others by their desire to do things<br />

better. High achievers like moderately challenging goals. They<br />

avoid what they perceive to be very easy or very difficult tasks.<br />

Individuals with a high need to achieve prefer and are strongly<br />

motivated in work situations with personal responsibility,<br />

feedback, and an intermediate degree of risk.<br />

Applications to Dentistry: On the one hand, try to identify the<br />

type of need your patient valued most and try to focus on that<br />

for motivation. On the other hand, similar to the Maslow’s<br />

theory, this theory gives us a remainder that there are different<br />

types of needs that the patient requires. Identification of<br />

individuals with a high need for achievement can be useful in<br />

selecting motivation methods.<br />

preferable to assigning goals whenever resistance is expected.<br />

People will do better when they get feedback on how well they<br />

are progressing toward their goals because feedback acts to<br />

guide behavior and self-generated feedback has been shown<br />

to be a more powerful motivator than externally generated<br />

feedback. Several contingencies exist in goal-setting theory.<br />

Feedback influences the goal-performance relationship. Goal<br />

commitment is most likely to occur when goals are made<br />

public, when the individual has an internal locus of control, and<br />

when the goals are set by the individual rather than assigned.<br />

The other contingency is self-efficacy. It is an individual’s belief<br />

that one is capable of performing a task. The higher one’s selfefficacy,<br />

the more confidence one has in one’s ability to<br />

succeed in a task. So, in difficult situations, people with low<br />

self-efficacy are likely to reduce their effort or give up<br />

;1altogether, whereas those with high self-efficacy seem to<br />

response to negative feedback with increased effort and<br />

motivation, whereas those with low self-efficacy are likely to<br />

reduce their effort when given negative feedback. Finally,<br />

national culture is a contingency that also affects goal-setting<br />

theory. One may conclude that intentions, as defined by hard<br />

and specific goals, are a powerful motivating force in goal-<br />

Goal-setting theory<br />

Would you have done better in dental school had<br />

your teacher in the phantom head course said, ‘you<br />

should strive for a grade B or above on all your tooth<br />

preparations’ rather than telling you just to ‘try your<br />

best’? Research on goal-setting theory addresses<br />

these issues, and the findings were impressive in<br />

term of the effect that goal specificity, challenge, and<br />

feedback have on performance 6 . This is the<br />

proposition that specific goals increase<br />

performance, and difficult goals, when accepted,<br />

result in higher performance than easy goals 6 . What<br />

is known about goals as motivators? Intention to<br />

work toward a goal is a major source of job<br />

motivation. Specific and challenging goals are<br />

superior motivating forces. Specific hard goals<br />

produce a higher level of output than do generalized<br />

goals. There is no contradiction that goal-setting<br />

theory says that motivation is maximized by difficult<br />

goals, whereas achievement motivation is<br />

stimulated by moderately challenging goals. As goalsetting<br />

theory deals with people in general;<br />

achievement theory is based only on people who<br />

have a high need for achievement. Difficult goals are<br />

still recommended to motivate the majority of<br />

people. The conclusions of goal-setting theory apply<br />

to those who accept and are committed to the goals.<br />

Difficult goals will lead to higher performance only if<br />

they are accepted. People will try harder if they<br />

participate in the planning and formulation of goals<br />

although it cannot be said that participation is<br />

always desirable. Participation is probably<br />

<strong>Dental</strong> <strong>Asia</strong> • May / June 2008<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!