28.10.2014 Views

Sanderling Plan - Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network

Sanderling Plan - Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network

Sanderling Plan - Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

However, the use of energetics in shorebird conservation planning carries a word of<br />

caution. Because conservation takes place within a limited framework (limited funds, time, and<br />

effort), conservationists are often asked to define a certain minimal goal, such as to identify the<br />

minimum number of important sites needed to meet an objective (i.e., that a species of interest<br />

may complete its migration). Although this approach has conceptual appeal for its simplicity, it<br />

is an inappropriate guiding framework for <strong>Sanderling</strong> (or shorebird) conservation for several<br />

important reasons: 1) stopover sites host a mix of individuals that originate from different<br />

locations and that are headed to different destinations (and therefore, only the furthest potential<br />

destination should be considered the ‘minimum’ distance); 2) many <strong>Sanderling</strong> habitats are<br />

experiencing increased levels of disturbance or dangers, and hence <strong>Sanderling</strong> will likely expend<br />

additional effort and energy in order to build up fat reserves (even if an ‘adequate’ food supply is<br />

present); and 3) any biggest-bang-for-the-buck approach invariably selects sites that host large<br />

numbers of birds; while this appears most efficient from a conservationist’s standpoint, it does<br />

not take into consideration the potential importance of maintaining ‘smaller’ sites (to enable<br />

spatial segregation among and within species), given that some species (e.g., aggregated) may<br />

fare better than others (e.g., dispersed) if crowded into a small set of sites. Finally, despite<br />

uncertainties as to effects on specific locations, in the age of climate change we may no longer<br />

have much room for error. We may find ourselves in the coming decades engaging in some<br />

serious hands-on actions to save this and other species. Hence, it is prudent to target a<br />

conservation approach that, while ambitious, is most likely to support their ecology and spread<br />

out the risk due to stochastic events.<br />

MONITORING<br />

In North America, <strong>Sanderling</strong> (along with other shorebird species) populations have been<br />

monitored by the International <strong>Shorebird</strong> Survey since the mid 1970s. Regional monitoring<br />

efforts that record <strong>Sanderling</strong>s also include the Canadian Maritime <strong>Shorebird</strong> Survey, the Pacific<br />

Flyways Project (active during the 1980s along the Pacific U.S. Coast), the <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Shorebird</strong><br />

Survey (initiated in 2000), the <strong>Western</strong> Atlantic <strong>Shorebird</strong> Association (currently active along<br />

the U.S. Atlantic), and the South Atlantic Migratory Bird Initiative (SAMBI), among others. In<br />

addition, individual researchers have gathered multiple years of data on the <strong>Sanderling</strong> in<br />

specific parts of its range, for example in Arcata and Bodega Bay, California; Delaware Bay,<br />

WHSRN – <strong>Sanderling</strong> Conservation <strong>Plan</strong>, February 2010, v1.1 65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!