28.10.2014 Views

Sanderling Plan - Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network

Sanderling Plan - Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network

Sanderling Plan - Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Obtain commitments/agreements from key decision-makers at important sites to change<br />

practices (e.g,. human disturbance management, pollution control) to benefit shorebirds.<br />

By 2013<br />

• Put strategies in place for purchasing or otherwise permanently protecting specific North<br />

or South American sites identified as being important (but currently unprotected).<br />

EVALUATION<br />

Although much remains unknown about <strong>Sanderling</strong> ecology and population dynamics,<br />

we must act to protect this species before all questions are answered; otherwise, conservation<br />

may become unattainable. However, actions taken with insufficient knowledge may result in an<br />

inefficient investment of resources for the amount of conservation gained. Therefore, it is<br />

essential that conservation and management actions have well-defined, measureable objectives<br />

and are implemented in a hypothesis-driven, adaptive framework to allow for iterative evaluation<br />

and adjustment (Schulte and Brown 2006). As specific research questions are addressed, their<br />

results will help steer resource and land managers towards the most effective strategies for<br />

conservation.<br />

Across the <strong>Sanderling</strong>’s range, the organizations and agencies responsible for managing<br />

<strong>Sanderling</strong> habitat should set objectives to increase or maintain the number of <strong>Sanderling</strong>s using<br />

their managed lands. Specific goals will vary by location. Hypotheses should be generated to test<br />

specific management actions (such as habitat restoration, beach closures, etc.), and management<br />

actions should be implemented in a way that enables testing of additional hypotheses. Such an<br />

approach is an iterative process, in which management and conservation actions are continually<br />

re-evaluated and adapted, so that explicit objectives may be met most efficiently (Schulte and<br />

Brown 2006). This process should be applied to quantify the effects of beach closures, habitat<br />

restoration, habitat alteration, and other actions. Although in many cases this approach remains<br />

an ideal rather than standard practice, it is nevertheless a crucial investment tool for<br />

understanding how to manage efficiently and effectively. Meanwhile, the continued commitment<br />

to multiple case studies can provide some insights into the apparent responses of wildlife to<br />

certain management actions.<br />

WHSRN – <strong>Sanderling</strong> Conservation <strong>Plan</strong>, February 2010, v1.1 68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!