Sanderling Plan - Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Piersma, T., and A. Lindstrom. 2004. Migrating shorebirds as integrative sentinels of global environmental change. Ibis 146 (Suppl.1) 61–69. Pitelka, F.A. 1974. An avifaunal review for the Barrow Region and North Slope of arctic Alaska. Arct. Alp. Res. 6: 161–184. Pitelka, F.A., J.P. Myers, and P.G. Connors. 1980. Spatial and resource-use patterns in wintering shorebirds: the Sanderling in central coastal California. Proc. Int. Ornithol. Congr. 17: 1041– 1044. Platt, M., and R. Goggans. 1993. Observation of shorebirds between Coos and Siuslaw rivers during fall migration, 1993. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife report to Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area. Pomeroy, A. 2006. Tradeoffs between food abundance and predation danger in spatial usage of a stopover site by western sandpipers, Calidris mauri. Oikos 112(3): 629 – 637. Pomeroy, A.C., R.W. Butler, and R.C. Ydenberg. 2006. Experimental evidence that migrants adjust usage at a stopover site to trade off food and danger. Behavioral Ecology 17(6): 1041– 1045. Potter, B.A., R.J. Gates, G.J. Soulliere, R.P. Russell, D.A. Granfors, and D.N. Ewert. 2007. Upper Mississippi River and Great Lakes Region Joint Venture Shorebird Habitat Conservation Strategy. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, MN. 101 pp. PRISM, Program for Regional and International Shorebird Monitoring. On the Internet: http://www.shorebirdworld.org/fromthefield/PRISM/PRISM1.htm Raffaele, H., J. Wiley, O. Garrido, A. Keith, and J. Raffaele. 1998. A guide to the birds of the West Indies. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ. Regional Shorebird Conservation Plans can be viewed and downloaded at: http://www.manomet.org/USSCP/ Roberts, G., and P.R. Evans. 1993. Responses of foraging sanderlings to human approaches. Behaviour 126:29–43. Rodgers, J.A., and S.T. Schwikert. 2002. Buffer-Zone Distances to Protect Foraging and Loafing Waterbirds from Disturbance by Personal Watercraft and Outboard-Powered Boats. Conservation Biology 16(1): 216–224. Root, T. 1988. Atlas of wintering North American birds. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. WHSRN – Sanderling Conservation Plan, February 2010, v1.1 80
Ross, K., K. Abraham, R. Clay, B. Collins, J. Iron, R. James, D. McLachlin and R. Weeber. 2003. Ontario Shorebird Conservation Plan. Environment Canada and North American Bird Conservation Initiative. 47 pp. Sallaberry, M., E. Tabilo, C. Klesse, and J. Abarca. 1996. The Chilean Shorebird Network (RECAP). Int. Wader Stud. 8: 71–78. Sauer, J.R., S. Schwartz, and B. Hoover. 1996. The Christmas Bird Count home page. Version 95.1. Patuxent Wildl. Res. Center, Laurel, MD. http://www.mbr.nbs.gov/bbs/cbc.html . Schick, C.T., T.M. Johnson, C.M. Kunde, and J.P. Myers. 1984. Aerial censuses of Sanderlings and estimates for other shorebirds on the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico, 1983–1984. Wader Study Group Bull. 41: 14–15. Schick, C.T., L.A Brennan, J.B. Buchanan, M.A. Finger, T.M. Johnson, and S.G. Herman. 1987. Organochlorine contamination in shorebirds from Washington state and the significance for their falcon predators. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 8:1–17. Schulte, S., S. Brown, and the American Oystercatcher Working Group. 2006. Version 1.0. American Oystercatcher Conservation Plan for the United States Atlantic and Gulf Coasts. Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences. Manomet, MA. 42 pp. Senner, S.E., and M.A. Howe. 1984. Conservation of Nearctic shorebirds. Pp. 379–421 in Behavior of marine animals. Vol. 5 (J. Burger and L. Olia, eds.). Plenum Press, New York, NY. Sherony, D.F. 1998. Sanderling. Pp. 251–252 in Bull’s birds of New York State (E. Levine, ed.). Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY. Shorebird Research Group of the Americas. On the Internet: http://www.shorebirdresearch.org/index.htm Shorebird Sister Schools Program (SSSP). On the Internet: http://www.fws.gov/sssp/ Skagen, S. K., and G. Thompson. 2000. Northern plains/prairie potholes regional shorebird conservation plan, version1. http://shorebirdplan.fws.gov/regionalshorebird/regionalplans.htm Smit, C. J., R.H.D. Lambeck, and W.J. Wolff. 1987. Threats to coastal wintering and staging areas of waders.Wader Study Group Bulletin 49 (Supplemental):105–113. Volume IV: Birds. 20–43 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Smit, C.J., and G.J.M. Visser. 1993. Effects of disturbance on shorebirds: a summary of existing knowledge from the Dutch Wadden Sea and Delta area. Wader Study Group Bulletin 68 (special issue):6–19. WHSRN – Sanderling Conservation Plan, February 2010, v1.1 81
Page 1 and 2:
CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE SANDERLIN
Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Page 5 and 6:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Sanderling (C
Page 7 and 8:
for Sanderlings will benefit other
Page 9 and 10:
RESUMEN EJECUTIVO El Calidris alba
Page 11 and 12:
Los C. alba comparten hábitat con
Page 13 and 14:
PURPOSE This document focuses on th
Page 15 and 16:
Individuals differ in extent of sit
Page 17 and 18:
North America, where data are suffi
Page 19 and 20:
Nunavut (near Nanisivik, Strathcona
Page 21 and 22:
Canada during fall, Sanderling are
Page 23 and 24:
Southbound During the fall passage
Page 25 and 26:
the Central flyway, moving up the T
Page 27 and 28:
of the Sanderling as a Species of H
Page 29 and 30:
also breed on Bathurst Island, Nuna
Page 31 and 32:
*New Jersey and Delaware - Delaware
Page 33 and 34: British Columbia, Canada: Sanderlin
Page 35 and 36: NONBREEDING (WINTERING) SITES Altho
Page 37 and 38: Rio de Janeiro Coastal Lagoons: Thi
Page 39 and 40: ~100 in February 1991 (Page et al.
Page 41 and 42: CONSERVATION THREATS Sanderlings fa
Page 43 and 44: for commercial construction project
Page 45 and 46: humans recreate on beaches, people
Page 47 and 48: Tabilo et al. 1996, MacWhirter et a
Page 49 and 50: the total area available for breedi
Page 51 and 52: However, Sanderlings are an excelle
Page 53 and 54: incurring a massive oil spill (J. B
Page 55 and 56: of surrounding rural communities; a
Page 57 and 58: Educational messages Educational co
Page 59 and 60: Sanderling populations on managed l
Page 61 and 62: Upper Mississippi/Great Lakes Regio
Page 63 and 64: o identifying food/roost resources
Page 65 and 66: Predation o Feeding and danger ecol
Page 67 and 68: Climate change impacts: Climate cha
Page 69 and 70: However, the use of energetics in s
Page 71 and 72: • Explore feasibility of, and the
Page 73 and 74: Evaluation of individual conservati
Page 75 and 76: Buchanan, J.B. 1988. The abundance
Page 77 and 78: Cramp, S., and K.E.L. Simmons. 1983
Page 79 and 80: Granfors, D.A. and N.D. Niemuth. 20
Page 81 and 82: the Birds of North America Online:
Page 83: Myers, J.P., C.T. Schick, and G. Ca
Page 87 and 88: Wershler, C. 1989. 1988 census and
Page 89 and 90: APPENDIX II. Relative Importance of
Page 91 and 92: , m, w = uncommon to fairly common,
Page 93 and 94: Table 2. U.S. Sites that host >1,00
Page 95 and 96: Table 4. U.S. sites with 1-4 years
Page 97 and 98: Table 6. U.S. sites reporting moder
Page 99 and 100: Site Name Country State/ Province S
Page 101 and 102: Site Name Shepody Bay West: Bay of
show all

Sanderling Plan - Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?