Sanderling Plan - Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network

More documents

Recommendations

Info

APPENDIX IV. Results of International Shorebird Survey (ISS) data analyses, highlighting important sites for the Sanderling during migration (Tables 1–4) and winter (Tables 5 and 6). Table 1. U.S. sites that host >1,000 Sanderlings during fall migration, and were surveyed by the International Shorebird Survey (ISS) for at least 5 years (during 1972–2005). Consistently important sites hosting 5,000 or more Sanderlings are indicated in bold. State Site name Count Category a Survey Period b Years c California Florida Florida Florida Massachusetts Massachusetts Massachusetts Massachusetts Massachusetts Massachusetts Massachusetts Massachusetts Massachusetts Massachusetts Maine New Jersey New York South Carolina Texas Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Tomales Bay, North Bay Casey Key Beach Cape Romano Marco River Quivet Creek & Wing Island Beach Monomoy Island NWR, North End Orleans, New Island Revere Point-O-Pines Duxbury Beach Plymouth Beach Lynn Harbor South Beach Island, Chatham Martha's Vineyard, C. Pogue Duxbury Crescent Beach Lubec - Lubec Flats Great Egg Harbor (Inlet) Plumb Beach, Brooklyn Huntington Beach State Park Mustang Island Beach Chincoteague NWR Back Bay NWR (excluding False Cape) Back Bay NWR (North Mile of Beach) False Cape (Beaches) I-II I-II I-II I-II I-II II-III I-II II II II I-II II-IV I-II II I-II I-II I-II I-II II II-IV II-IV I-II II-IV 90 70, 80 80 70, 80 70, 80, 90* 70, 80, 90, 00 70, 80 70, 90, 00 70, 80, 90, 00 70, 80, 90, 00 80*, 90*, 00 90, 00* 90, 00 90, 00 70*, 80, 90, 00 70*, 80 70*, 80, 90 70*, 80, 00 70, 80 70*, 80*, 90*, 00* 90*, 00 90, 00 80*, 90*, 00 7 6 9 15 8 32 12 6 14 28 8 14 9 10 6 15 14 6 5 24 8 7 7 a Count Category: Category indicates typical maximum count values of Sanderling during fall migration at that site (I = hundreds of Sanderlings; II = 1,000–5,000; III = 5,001–10,000; IV = 10,001–20,000; V = >20,000). When values fell within several count categories, all categories were indicated. b Survey Period: Decade during which ISS counts were made (70 = 1970s, 80 = 1980s; 90 = 1990s; 00 = 2000s). Asterisks indicate the survey period (decade) during which the highest count category was reported. c Years: Number of years of fall ISS surveys (between 1972–2005). WHSRN – Sanderling Conservation Plan, February 2010, v1.1 88
Table 2. U.S. Sites that host >1,000 Sanderlings (at least once) during fall migration, and were surveyed by the International Shorebird Survey (ISS) for 1–4 years (during 1972–2005). Important sites hosting 5,000 or more Sanderlings are indicated in bold. State Site name Count Category a California Florida Georgia Georgia Maine Maryland Massachusetts Massachusetts Massachusetts Massachusetts Massachusetts Massachusetts Massachusetts New Jersey New Jersey New Jersey New Jersey North Carolina North Carolina North Carolina North Carolina North Carolina Texas Virginia Washington Washington San Francisco Bay Nassau Sound Blackbeard Island NWR Little St. Simons Island (Bass Creek) Reid State Park Assateague Island West Island, Fairhaven Boston Harbor (TASL Project) Eastham (Nauset Coast Guard Beach) Ipswich, Cranes Beach (new,1993) Lynn Beach/Long Beach Revere, Point of Pines South Beach/Chatham Brigantine Beach Sandy Hook Stone Harbor Point Wildwood, Two Mile Beach Pond Cape Hatteras Nat'l S. (Beach Bodie Isl.) Cape Hatteras Nat'l Seashore (Ramp 26-32) Cape Hatteras Nat'l Seashore (Ramp 44-49) Clam Shoal (Bird Islands) Pea Island NWR Padre Island Nat'l Seashore (64 Mile Beach) Wallops Island Leadbetter Point Ocean Shores II I-II I-II I-II I-II II II II I-II II II I-II II I-III I-II I-II III II II II II II II-III II III II Survey Period b 80 0 90 90 70, 00 70 00 90 70*, 00 90, 00 00 00 00 70 70, 80 80, 00* 00 00 70 00 00 70 90 70 70 90 Years c 1 2 3 3 2 1 1 1 3 4 3 2 1 3 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 a Count Category: Category indicates typical maximum count values of Sanderling during fall migration at that site (I = hundreds of Sanderlings; II = 1,000–5,000; III = 5,001–10,000; IV = 10,001–20,000; V = >20,000). When values fell within several count categories, all categories were indicated. b Survey Period: Decade during which ISS counts were made (70 = 1970s, 80 = 1980s; 90 = 1990s; 00 = 2000s). Asterisks indicate the survey period (decade) during which the highest count category was reported. c Years: Number of years of fall ISS surveys (between 1972–2005). WHSRN – Sanderling Conservation Plan, February 2010, v1.1 89
Page 1 and 2:
CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE SANDERLIN
Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Page 5 and 6:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Sanderling (C
Page 7 and 8:
for Sanderlings will benefit other
Page 9 and 10:
RESUMEN EJECUTIVO El Calidris alba
Page 11 and 12:
Los C. alba comparten hábitat con
Page 13 and 14:
PURPOSE This document focuses on th
Page 15 and 16:
Individuals differ in extent of sit
Page 17 and 18:
North America, where data are suffi
Page 19 and 20:
Nunavut (near Nanisivik, Strathcona
Page 21 and 22:
Canada during fall, Sanderling are
Page 23 and 24:
Southbound During the fall passage
Page 25 and 26:
the Central flyway, moving up the T
Page 27 and 28:
of the Sanderling as a Species of H
Page 29 and 30:
also breed on Bathurst Island, Nuna
Page 31 and 32:
*New Jersey and Delaware - Delaware
Page 33 and 34:
British Columbia, Canada: Sanderlin
Page 35 and 36:
NONBREEDING (WINTERING) SITES Altho
Page 37 and 38:
Rio de Janeiro Coastal Lagoons: Thi
Page 39 and 40:
~100 in February 1991 (Page et al.
Page 41 and 42: CONSERVATION THREATS Sanderlings fa
Page 43 and 44: for commercial construction project
Page 45 and 46: humans recreate on beaches, people
Page 47 and 48: Tabilo et al. 1996, MacWhirter et a
Page 49 and 50: the total area available for breedi
Page 51 and 52: However, Sanderlings are an excelle
Page 53 and 54: incurring a massive oil spill (J. B
Page 55 and 56: of surrounding rural communities; a
Page 57 and 58: Educational messages Educational co
Page 59 and 60: Sanderling populations on managed l
Page 61 and 62: Upper Mississippi/Great Lakes Regio
Page 63 and 64: o identifying food/roost resources
Page 65 and 66: Predation o Feeding and danger ecol
Page 67 and 68: Climate change impacts: Climate cha
Page 69 and 70: However, the use of energetics in s
Page 71 and 72: • Explore feasibility of, and the
Page 73 and 74: Evaluation of individual conservati
Page 75 and 76: Buchanan, J.B. 1988. The abundance
Page 77 and 78: Cramp, S., and K.E.L. Simmons. 1983
Page 79 and 80: Granfors, D.A. and N.D. Niemuth. 20
Page 81 and 82: the Birds of North America Online:
Page 83 and 84: Myers, J.P., C.T. Schick, and G. Ca
Page 85 and 86: Ross, K., K. Abraham, R. Clay, B. C
Page 87 and 88: Wershler, C. 1989. 1988 census and
Page 89 and 90: APPENDIX II. Relative Importance of
Page 91: , m, w = uncommon to fairly common,
Page 95 and 96: Table 4. U.S. sites with 1-4 years
Page 97 and 98: Table 6. U.S. sites reporting moder
Page 99 and 100: Site Name Country State/ Province S
Page 101 and 102: Site Name Shepody Bay West: Bay of
show all

Sanderling Plan - Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?