DRAFT Tuart Conservation and Management Strategy

More documents

Recommendations

Info

APPENDIX 6.4 DECISION MAKING FRAMEWORK Shows decision-making processes for the development and implementation of the Tuart Conservation and Management Strategy and Action Plan. Natural Environment Industry and Community Cabinet MINISTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT STATUTORY BODIES GOVERNMENT AGENCIES TUART RESPONSE GROUP 57
APPENDIX 6.5 TABLE OF 'INDICATIVE HIGH CONSERVATION' TUART WOODLANDS 28 Soil System Rainfall Land Category (mm) CALMmanaged Public Private Other Total (hectares) Abba 700 – 799 5.9 0.0 0.3 0.0 6.2 Bassendean 800 – 899 156.9 55.0 34.9 4.5 251.3 Moore River 600 – 699 0.3 6.2 10.5 1.5 18.5 700 – 799 0.0 2.1 31.4 1.4 35.0 Pinjarra 800 – 899 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.1 6.4 Quindalup 500 – 599 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 600 – 699 0.0 10.4 25.4 27.9 63.7 700 – 799 24.3 11.1 88.5 10.8 134.7 800 – 899 27.2 33.7 155.0 3.1 219.1 Spearwood 500 – 599 3.4 0.00 0.0 0.0 3.4 600 – 699 51.7 1.0 47.8 0.3 100.9 700 – 799 2,824.9 223.8 995.1 62.2 4,106.1 800 – 899 3,680.4 163.2 1,461.5 100.6 5,405.7 900 – 999 77.1 0.0 59.2 3.4 139.7 Vasse 800 – 899 261.1 57.8 42.5 9.7 371.1 Total 7,114.9 564.4 2,959.5 225.5 10,864.3 28 The data was sourced from the report ‘ Tools for identifying indicative high conservation tuart woodlands’ (Ecoscape 2004). It shows the areas of low visible disturbance understorey tuart woodlands intersected with soil systems, rainfall zones and land category. The areas bolded and highlighted in grey tones are tuart remnants: (i) occurring on uncommon soil systems and rainfall zones, that (ii) are likely to have unique vegetation communities and are therefore (iii) ranked as ‘indicative high conservation’ tuart woodlands. 58
Page 1 and 2:
DRAFT Tuart Conservation and Manage
Page 3 and 4:
H o w t o p a r t i c i p a t e If
Page 5 and 6:
1.8 Framework for strategy developm
Page 7 and 8: E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y Thi
Page 9 and 10: SECTION 1 I n t r o d u c t i o n 1
Page 11 and 12: 1.4 Vision for the future The range
Page 13 and 14: species to cross them. For example
Page 15 and 16: esulted from changes to natural dis
Page 17 and 18: more destructive tuart longicorn (P
Page 19 and 20: 1.7 Guiding principles for strategy
Page 21 and 22: • The fourth, and perhaps most im
Page 23 and 24: • the Environmental Protection Ac
Page 25 and 26: tuarts on private land. The Ministe
Page 27 and 28: Environmental Protection Act (1986)
Page 29 and 30: CALM Management Plans The Conservat
Page 31 and 32: SECTION 2 T a r g e t s a n d s t r
Page 33 and 34: OUTCOME 1: CONSERVATION Tuart and i
Page 35 and 36: OUTCOME 1: CONSERVATION Tuart and i
Page 37 and 38: OUTCOME 2: RESEARCH Investigations
Page 39 and 40: OUTCOME 3: COMMUNITY AWARENESS The
Page 41 and 42: OUTCOME 4: PARTNERSHIPS Partnership
Page 43 and 44: OUTCOME 5: DEVELOPMENT PLANS All pl
Page 45 and 46: OUTCOME 6: INCENTIVES Institutional
Page 47 and 48: Approach 2: Advisory groups such as
Page 49 and 50: Department of Conservation and Land
Page 51 and 52: Smith, F. G. (1973). Vegetation Map
Page 53 and 54: Natural Resource Management: The ec
Page 55 and 56: APPENDIX 6.1 TUART EXTENT BY LAND C
Page 57: APPENDIX 6.3 STRUCTURE OF TUART CON
Page 61 and 62: APPENDIX 6.7 INDICATIVE SCHEDULE FO
Page 63 and 64: APPENDIX 6.7 INDICATIVE SCHEDULE FO
Page 65 and 66: APPENDIX 6.8 EXISTING INITIATIVES A
Page 67 and 68: APPENDIX 6.9 ANALYSIS OF 2002 WORKS
Page 69 and 70: APPENDIX 6.9 ANALYSIS OF 2002 WORKS
Page 71 and 72: PART B DRAFT OUTCOMES Draft Outcome
Page 73 and 74: PART D TARGETS Are there any target
Page 75 and 76: PART E. IMPLEMENTATION The draft Tu
show all

DRAFT Tuart Conservation and Management Strategy

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?