08.11.2014 Views

CPG for Psychosocial Interventions in Severe Mental ... - GuíaSalud

CPG for Psychosocial Interventions in Severe Mental ... - GuíaSalud

CPG for Psychosocial Interventions in Severe Mental ... - GuíaSalud

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SR (1++)<br />

SR (1-)<br />

The ACT is associated with a reduction average of 40% <strong>in</strong> the use of<br />

beds 8 .<br />

The ACT is associated with an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> satisfaction with the services<br />

compared with ST (Client Satisfaction Scale: n = 120; WMD = -0.56;<br />

95% CI: between -0.77 and -0.36) 8 .<br />

Hous<strong>in</strong>g and work<br />

The ACT reduces the probability of users becom<strong>in</strong>g “homeless”, compared<br />

with ST (n = 374; RR = 0.22, 95% CI: between 0.09 and 0.56; NNT = 10;<br />

95% CI between 7 and 20) 8 .<br />

Patients who receive ACT have more probabilities of liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dependently<br />

than those that receive community ST (not liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dependently at<br />

the end of the study: n = 362; RR = 0.70; 95% CI: between 0.57 and 0.87;<br />

NNT = 7, 95% CI : between 5 and 17) 8 .<br />

People who receive ACT have less probabilities of be<strong>in</strong>g unemployed at the end of the study<br />

than those that receive community ST (n = 604; RR = 0.86; 95% CI: between 0.80 and 0.91; NNT<br />

= 8; 95% CI: between 6 and 13) 8 .<br />

Symptoms and quality of life<br />

SR (1-)<br />

People who receive ACT improve their mental state more than those who<br />

receive standard community care, but the difference is small <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ical significance (BPRS/Brief Symptom Inventory/Colorado Symptom<br />

Index: n = 255; WMD = -0.16; 95% CI: between -0.41 and -0.08) 8 .<br />

“Homeless” people who receive ACT have probabilities of experienc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ically significant improvements <strong>in</strong> the quality of life, compared<br />

with those that receive ST (General Well-be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Quality of Life Scale: n<br />

= 125; WMD = -0.52; 95% CI: between -0.99 and -0.05) 8 .<br />

5.3.4. Intensive Case Management (ICM)<br />

ICM vs. Standard Case Management (CM)<br />

ICM is associated with an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> contact with the services, compared with that provided with<br />

standard CM (number of losses <strong>in</strong> follow-up after 2 years: n = 1060; RR = 0.54, 95% CI: between<br />

0.39 and 0.74) 8 .<br />

SR (1+)<br />

There is no significant difference between ICM and standard CM <strong>in</strong><br />

terms of numbers of participants who lose contact with their case manager<br />

(n = 780; RR = 1.27; 95% CI: between 0.85 and 1.90) 8 , or <strong>in</strong> terms of readmission<br />

rates, either (n = 747; RR = 0.95, 95% CI: between 0.85 and 1.05) 8 .<br />

98 CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES IN THE SPANISH NHS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!