CPG for Psychosocial Interventions in Severe Mental ... - GuÃaSalud

More documents

Recommendations

Info

RCT (1-) Social functioning One study informed of the results obtained from using the 7 subscales of the Social Functioning Questionnaire. No significant effects were observed for the withdrawal ( n= 133; WMD = 0.54; 95% IC: between -0.4 and 1.5), interpersonal behaviour (n = 133; WMD = 0.5; 95% CI: between -0.1 and 1.2), independence (performance) (n = 133; WMD = 1.9; 95% CI: between -0.2 and 4), independence (competence) (n = 133; WMD = -0.3; 95% CI: between -1.5 and 1), recreation (n = 133; WMD = 1.17; 95% CI: between -0.7 and 3), or employment (n = 133; WMD = 0.9; 95% CI: between -0.2 and 2) However, a significant effect was observed in favour of CBT for prosocial behaviour (n = 133; WMD = 4.9, 95% CI: between 2 and 7.7) 41 Cognitive-behavioural therapy (BCT) + standard treatment (ST) vs supportive psychotherapy + standard treatment (ST). RCT (1-) SR (1-) RCT (1-) RCT (1-) SR (1-) RCT (1-) RCT (1-) RCT (1-) Relapses The studies found no significant differences in the relapse ratios between CBT and supportive psychotherapy, in the medium term (1 RCT; n = 59; RR = 0.6; 95% CI: between 0.2 and 2; proof of the global effect = -0.75;p = 0.5), or long term (2 RCT; n = 83; WMD = 1.1; 95% CI: between 0.5 and 2.4; proof of the global effect = -0.12; p = 0.9) 32 One RCT informed of data based on the GAF scale and found no significant effects, either (1 RCT; n = 30, WMD = -0.5; 95% CI: between -7.6 and 6.6; proof of the global effect = -0.14; p = 0.9) 42 Mental state CBT did not significantly improve the clinically significant improvement ratios in the mid term (1 RCT; n = 59; RR = 0.8: 95% CI: between 0.6 and 1.1; proof of the global effect = -1.60, p = 0.11)38 or in the long term (2 RCT; n = 100; RR = 0.9; 95% CI: between 0.8 and 1.1; proof of the global effect = -0.62; p = 0.5) 32 Scores for general symptoms: In a continuous measurement of the mental state (measured with the BPRS scale) no significant differences were found between CBT and supportive psychotherapy in the short term (1 RCT; n = 20; WMD = 8.5: 95% CI: between -3 and 20; proof of the global effect = 1.42; p = 0.16) 35 However, significant differences were observed in the medium term in favour of CBT (1 RCT; n = 37; WMD = -7.6; 95% CI: between -14 and -0.9; p = 0.03) 37 In the total score of the Positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS), in one study no significant short-term effects were found (1 RCT; n = 149; WMD = 1.8; 95% CI: between -4.0 and 7.6; proof of the global effect = 0.60, p = 0.5) 64 or in the long term (1 RCT n = 40; WMD = -6.5, 95% CI: between -18.9 and 5.9; proof of the global effect = -1.02; p = 0.3) 42 42 CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES IN THE SPANISH NHS
Specific symptoms: when CBT was compared with other psychological treatments, no positive effect was observed in the improvement of delirium (1 RCT, n = 40; WMD = 1.4; 95% CI: between -2.3 and 5.1; proof of the global effect = 0.74;p = 0.5), but it was found with respect to hallucinations (1 RCT; n = 40; WMD = 1.24; 95% CI: between 2.1 and 4.6; proof of the global effect = -0.12; p = 0.9) 42 Cognitive-behavioural therapy (BCT) vs standard treatment (ST) Relapses There is not sufficient evidence to determine if CBT improves relapses when SR (1+) compared with standard care (routine care, Case Management and medication) during treatment (n = 121; RR = 0.88, 95% CI: between 0.46 and 1.66), when compared with standard care 12 months after treatment (n = 61; RR = 1.51; 95% CI: between 0.79 and 2.87) and 1-2 years after treatment (n = 154; RR = 0.83, 95% CI: between 0.6 and 1.13) 8 Longer-lasting CBT programmes (more than 3 months) reduce relapses, compared with other interventions (n = 177; RR = 0.72, 95% CI: between 0.52 and 0.99; NNT = 7; 95% CI: between 4 and 100) 8 Symptoms There is certain evidence that indicates that CBT, when compared with ST, SR (1-) reduces symptoms at the end of the treatment (there is no significant improvement taken as the reduction of 40% in the total score of the BPRS scale or as the reduction of 50% in the positive symptoms of the BPRS scale (n = 121; RR = 0.78; 95% CI: between 0.66 and 0.92; NNT = 5; 95% CI: between 4 and 13) 8 CBT improves the mental state when compared with standard treatment at the end of the treatment (final scores of the PANSS/BPRS/CPRS SR (1+) scales: n = 580; SMI = -0.21; 95% CI: between -0.38 and -0.04) 8 There is not sufficient evidence that indicates that CBT reduces symptoms when compared with other psychological interventions at the end of SR (1-) the treatment (there is no significant improvement when measured as the reduction of 50% in positive symptoms of the BPRS scale: n = 121; RR = 0.76; 95% CI: between 0.62 and 0.93; NNT = 5; 95% CI between 3 and 15), nor at 9-12 months after treatment (there is no important improvement, taken as the reduction of 20% in the total score of the BPRS scale or 20% in the reduction of the score of the positive symptoms of the BPRS scale: n = 149; RR = 0.79; 95% CI: between 0.63 and 1.00) 8 Persistent Symptomatology It is not possible to determine if CBT reduces symptoms after 9 months’ SR (1-) follow-up (there is no important improvement when measured as a 20% reduction in BPRS: n = 60; RR = 0.53; 95% CI: between 0.35 and 0.81; NNT = 3, 95% CI between: 2 and 6) 8 CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR PSICHOSOCIAL INTERVENTIONS IN SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS 43
Page 1: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Ps
Page 4 and 5: This CPG is an aid for decision mak
Page 7 and 8: Table of Contents Presentation 7 Au
Page 9 and 10: Presentation Healthcare practice is
Page 11 and 12: Authorship and collaborators CPG de
Page 13: José Manuel Lalana Cuenca. Special
Page 16 and 17: c) SERVICE LEVEL INTERVENTIONS •
Page 18 and 19: A B A A B B B C Psychosocial inter
Page 20 and 21: B B B C A C C 5.3. SERVICE LEV
Page 22 and 23: 20 CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES IN
Page 24 and 25: independence, quality of life, pers
Page 26 and 27: This guideline is aimed at mental h
Page 28 and 29: Figure 1. Search Strategy Search fo
Page 30 and 31: The highest evidence level found wa
Page 33 and 34: 4. Characteristics of the CPG 4.1.
Page 35 and 36: The main focus of rehabilitation is
Page 37 and 38: 5. Psychosocial type rehabilitation
Page 39 and 40: From another point of view, social
Page 41 and 42: defined as “standard care” or
Page 43: General global state In the short r
Page 47 and 48: In the systematic review by Kurtz a
Page 49 and 50: Summary of evidence 1- 1- 1- 1- 1-
Page 51 and 52: People with SMI and a diagnosis of
Page 53 and 54: 5.1.3. Interpersonal therapy The li
Page 55 and 56: weekly or fortnightly sessions. The
Page 57 and 58: 5.1.5. Family interventions There a
Page 59 and 60: In the RCT carried out by Hogarty e
Page 61 and 62: A family intervention of more than
Page 63 and 64: After two years’ treatment, and b
Page 65 and 66: Family intervention vs. other psych
Page 67 and 68: 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1+ No diffe
Page 69 and 70: Question to be answered • Are pys
Page 71 and 72: Summary of evidence Pyschoeducation
Page 73 and 74: with schizophrenia and that the tre
Page 75 and 76: With reference to the type of train
Page 77 and 78: would normally receive and which in
Page 79 and 80: Hypnosis vs. relaxation No improvem
Page 81 and 82: Supervised fl ats are a community h
Page 83 and 84: 3 Programmes directed to leisure an
Page 85 and 86: SMI (schizophrenia, affective schiz
Page 87 and 88: When PVT is compared with standard
Page 89 and 90: Patients included in the individual
Page 91 and 92: 1+ 1+ 1++ 1+ 1+ 1+ 1+ The people in
Page 93 and 94: Music therapy Music therapy + stand
Page 95 and 96:
A series of Case Management systems
Page 97 and 98:
• The satisfaction data originati
Page 99 and 100:
Loss of contact With respect to the
Page 101 and 102:
There is not sufficient evidence, e
Page 103 and 104:
1+ 1+ 1+ 1+ Respect to ICM teams or
Page 105 and 106:
Finally, in the RCT by Cheng et al
Page 107 and 108:
5.4.2. “Homeless” with SMI The
Page 109 and 110:
Patients who access housing with no
Page 111:
ceptive disorders. This series of c
Page 115 and 116:
7. Recommendations for Future Resea
Page 117:
Appendices
Page 120 and 121:
Appendix 2. Information obtained fr
Page 122 and 123:
Appendix 4. Information for people
Page 124 and 125:
4. Regulatory and legal framework 1
Page 126 and 127:
Several protocols have been publish
Page 128 and 129:
The coordination of these resources
Page 130 and 131:
Social protection systems Pursuant
Page 132 and 133:
Specifi c regulation • (SPANISH)
Page 134 and 135:
Service Management: The first anti-
Page 136 and 137:
on Mental Health and the future Eur
Page 138 and 139:
Spanish Society of Legal Psychiatry
Page 140 and 141:
Appendix 5. Abbreviations ACT Asser
Page 142 and 143:
Appendix 6. Glossary Therapy adhere
Page 144 and 145:
Appendix 7. Declaration of interest
Page 146 and 147:
15 Rossler W. Psychiatric rehabilit
Page 148 and 149:
53 Graeber DA, Moyers TB, Griffi th
Page 150 and 151:
86 Schooler NR, Keith SJ, Severe JB
Page 152 and 153:
117 Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Effecti
Page 154 and 155:
154 López M, García-Cubillana P,
Page 156 and 157:
190 Bond GR, Drake RE. Predictors o
Page 158 and 159:
225 Hurley AD. Individual psychothe
show all

CPG for Psychosocial Interventions in Severe Mental ... - GuÃ­aSalud

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?

CPG for Psychosocial Interventions in Severe Mental ... - GuÃaSalud