15.11.2014 Views

downloadable - Visit Montserrat

downloadable - Visit Montserrat

downloadable - Visit Montserrat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Draft Final Report, 19 th July, 2012<br />

29. REORGANISE AND STRENGTHEN<br />

INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS<br />

29.1 INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK<br />

Currently, as outlined in Ch 12 earlier, the airport and the jetty<br />

at Little Bay come under the responsibility of the Ministry of<br />

Communication & Works. There is no airport or seaport<br />

authority responsible for the management of the access<br />

infrastructure.<br />

Under Scenarios B and C, with the planned development of a<br />

seaport at Carr’s Bay and the commissioning of a sea ferry<br />

and Twin Otter, there will be a need to have dedicated<br />

organization responsible for overall management of access<br />

transport to and from <strong>Montserrat</strong> covering both the<br />

infrastructure and services. This is the lesson from the<br />

experience of other islands in the Caribbean (and in countries<br />

worldwide) where the responsibility for access transport is<br />

usually vested in separate or joint air and sea port authorities.<br />

These authorities are usually state owned enterprises, but<br />

operate on a commercial basis and have, subject to<br />

government approval, the statutory powers to raise funds by<br />

way of loans, debentures or other means, in addition to<br />

revenue generation by way of departure and other forms of<br />

passenger taxes and freight charges.<br />

We recommend the establishment of a <strong>Montserrat</strong> Air & Sea<br />

Ports Authority, with responsibility for access transport<br />

infrastructure (airport and seaport) and services. This implies<br />

that the Authority will be proactive in promotion of air services,<br />

ferry services and cruise ship calls to <strong>Montserrat</strong>.<br />

29.2 MONTSERRAT TOURIST BOARD’S STATUTORY<br />

FUNCTIONS AND OPERATIONS<br />

The MTB’s statutory position was reviewed in Ch 12 earlier.<br />

Essentially, the Act setting up the MTB is a sound piece of<br />

legislation which should stand the test of time in that it is<br />

flexible enough to deal with any changed circumstances which<br />

may require the MTB to undertake different activities for the<br />

development of tourism.<br />

However, one of the operations of the MTB – the Culture Unit<br />

- is anomalous, in that the MTB is responsible for the<br />

operations of the Unit, but does not have the statutory function<br />

to do so. We recommend that this situation is regularized by<br />

means of an amendment to the 1993 Act setting up the MTB,<br />

which would empower the MTB with responsibility for cultural<br />

affairs.<br />

29.3 ORGANISATION AND OPERATIONS OF THE MTB<br />

One of the important lessons from the performance of TDP 2<br />

is that the organization and operations of the MTB must reflect<br />

not just the issues confronting the tourism sector, but also the<br />

scale of the industry itself. The implication is that the<br />

organizational structure and operations of the MTB, going<br />

forward, must reflect the growth path of the tourism sector.<br />

MONTSERRAT TOURISM DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2012 – 2022<br />

116

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!