18.11.2014 Views

human rights and legislation who resource book on mental health

human rights and legislation who resource book on mental health

human rights and legislation who resource book on mental health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introducti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> how to use this checklist<br />

This checklist is a compani<strong>on</strong> to the WHO Resource Book <strong>on</strong> Mental Health, Human Rights <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Legislati<strong>on</strong>. Its objectives are to: a) assist countries in reviewing the comprehensiveness <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

adequacy of existing <strong>mental</strong> <strong>health</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>legislati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>; <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> b) help them in the process of drafting new<br />

law. This checklist can help countries assess whether key comp<strong>on</strong>ents are included in<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>legislati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> ensure that the broad recommendati<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>tained in the Resource Book are<br />

carefully examined <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sidered.<br />

A committee to work through the checklist is recommended. While an individual in, for example,<br />

the ministry of <strong>health</strong>, may be able to complete the checklist, this has certain limitati<strong>on</strong>s. First,<br />

no single pers<strong>on</strong> is likely to have all the relevant informati<strong>on</strong> that a well selected team would<br />

have. Sec<strong>on</strong>dly, different individuals or representatives of different groups are likely to have<br />

differing views <strong>on</strong> various issues. An evaluati<strong>on</strong> committee that allows critical debate <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

development of a c<strong>on</strong>sensus is invaluable. Although countries should decide for themselves <strong>on</strong><br />

the compositi<strong>on</strong> of the committee, it is advisable to include a legal practiti<strong>on</strong>er familiar with the<br />

various nati<strong>on</strong>al laws, the govern<strong>mental</strong> <strong>mental</strong> <strong>health</strong> focal point, representatives of service user<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> family groups, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> representatives of <strong>mental</strong> <strong>health</strong> professi<strong>on</strong>als, NGOs <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> different<br />

government departments. It is recommended that the process be led <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> mediated by an<br />

independent <str<strong>on</strong>g>human</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>rights</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>/or legal expert.<br />

This checklist should generally not be utilized without thoroughly studying the Resource Book<br />

itself. A number of important items included in the checklist are explained in the Resource Book,<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the rati<strong>on</strong>ale <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> different opti<strong>on</strong>s for <str<strong>on</strong>g>legislati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> are discussed. The Resource Book<br />

emphasizes that countries should make their own decisi<strong>on</strong>s about various alternatives <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> ways<br />

of drafting <str<strong>on</strong>g>legislati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> as well as about a number of c<strong>on</strong>tent issues. The format of this checklist<br />

allows for such flexibility, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> aims to encourage internal debate; it thus permits countries to<br />

make decisi<strong>on</strong>s based <strong>on</strong> their own unique situati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

The checklist covers issues from a broad perspective, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> many of the provisi<strong>on</strong>s will need to<br />

be fleshed out or elaborated up<strong>on</strong> with respect to details <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> country specificati<strong>on</strong>s. Moreover,<br />

not all provisi<strong>on</strong>s will be equally relevant to all countries due to different social, ec<strong>on</strong>omic, cultural<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> political factors. For example, not all countries will choose to have community treatment<br />

orders; not all countries have provisi<strong>on</strong> for “n<strong>on</strong>-protesting patients”; <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> in most countries,<br />

sterilizati<strong>on</strong> of people with <strong>mental</strong> disorders will not be relevant. However, while each country in<br />

its evaluative process may determine that a particular provisi<strong>on</strong> is not relevant, this determinati<strong>on</strong><br />

should be made part of the checklist exercise. All provisi<strong>on</strong>s in the checklist should be<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sidered <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> discussed carefully before it is decided that <strong>on</strong>e (or more) of the provisi<strong>on</strong>s is not<br />

relevant to a country’s particular c<strong>on</strong>text.<br />

The Resource Book points out that countries may have laws that affect <strong>mental</strong> <strong>health</strong> in a single<br />

statute or in numerous different statutory laws relating to areas such as general <strong>health</strong>,<br />

employment, housing, discriminati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> criminal justice. Moreover, some countries utilize<br />

regulati<strong>on</strong>s, orders <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> other mechanisms to complement a statutory act. It is therefore<br />

essential, when c<strong>on</strong>ducting this audit, to collect <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> collate all legal provisi<strong>on</strong>s pertaining to<br />

<strong>mental</strong> <strong>health</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> to make decisi<strong>on</strong>s based <strong>on</strong> comprehensive informati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

The Resource Book makes it clear that drawing up or changing <strong>mental</strong> <strong>health</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>legislati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> is a<br />

“process”. Establishing what needs to be included in the <str<strong>on</strong>g>legislati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> is an important element of<br />

that process, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> this checklist can be a useful aid to achieving this goal. N<strong>on</strong>etheless, the<br />

objective of drafting a law that can be implemented in a country must never be separated from<br />

the “c<strong>on</strong>tent”, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> must always be a central c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

120

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!