20.11.2014 Views

Nuclear Plant Journal Outage Management ... - Digital Versions

Nuclear Plant Journal Outage Management ... - Digital Versions

Nuclear Plant Journal Outage Management ... - Digital Versions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Benchmarking Against U.S.<br />

Standards<br />

By Magnox North, United Kingdom.<br />

1. Which of Magnox North’s plants has<br />

minimum refueling outage period? Please<br />

describe about Magnox North’s strategies<br />

which have resulted in this minimal<br />

refueling outage accomplishments.<br />

The Magnox North has 2 Operational<br />

<strong>Nuclear</strong> Power <strong>Plant</strong>s, Wylfa in North<br />

Wales and Oldbury in the south west of<br />

England. Both of our operational power<br />

plants are first generation twin unit Gas<br />

Cooled Reactors (Magnox Reactors),<br />

which have an on-load refueling capability,<br />

therefore refueling outages are not<br />

required.<br />

The Reactor Pressure Vessels at each<br />

of our sites do require “statutory” biennial<br />

inspection and maintenance, along<br />

with plant systems that can not be released<br />

during normal operations. In order<br />

to facilitate this work Statutory outages<br />

occur on each reactor every 2 years.<br />

Oldbury Power Station is the oldest<br />

operational <strong>Nuclear</strong> Power <strong>Plant</strong> in the<br />

world and Wylfa is the second oldest.<br />

Although both sites are of the Magnox<br />

Design they were built during a period of<br />

fast paced engineering change and other<br />

than the basic design elements, the sites<br />

are dissimilar. <strong>Outage</strong> durations at both<br />

sites are determined by a variety of plant<br />

aging related problems.<br />

The Magnox North employs a<br />

strategy of Incentivization of the M&O<br />

contract through increasing fee associated<br />

with generation, which leads to pressure<br />

to reduce <strong>Outage</strong> durations.<br />

Magnox North Sites the current<br />

M&O contractor (Magnox North Sites)<br />

has employed a number of strategies to<br />

reduce <strong>Outage</strong> durations, comprising:-<br />

Responses to questions by Newal<br />

Agnihotri, Editor of <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Plant</strong><br />

<strong>Journal</strong>.<br />

Magnox North is owned by<br />

EnergySolutions, Inc. Magnox reactors<br />

fuel on-load so outages are for<br />

maintenance purposes only.<br />

• Benchmarking of the <strong>Outage</strong> processes<br />

against US standards.<br />

The Magnox sites reviewed the<br />

US model for outage management<br />

between 2002 and 2005 to identify<br />

best practices that could reduce <strong>Outage</strong><br />

durations across the Magnox<br />

fleet. Changes brought about through<br />

this process included:-<br />

1. The use of project management<br />

techniques.<br />

2. <strong>Outage</strong> area Project leads<br />

were appointed to provide a<br />

focus for each plant area.<br />

3. Development of dedicated<br />

plant area teams.<br />

4. The use of a common Out-<br />

Oldbury Reactor and Pylon<br />

age standard,<br />

5. the use of critical path analysis.<br />

• Greater utilization of Operational<br />

Event Feedback (OEF) linked to the<br />

<strong>Outage</strong> program.<br />

The <strong>Outage</strong> teams use the OEF<br />

process to capture any non conformance<br />

with the <strong>Outage</strong> plan or any loss or event.<br />

More details in response to question 2<br />

below.<br />

• Magnox cross site learning<br />

The 2 operational sites work<br />

closely to share learning and best practice.<br />

The <strong>Outage</strong> managers from each site are<br />

both involved in all post outages reviews.<br />

2. How is “lessons learned” from<br />

one refueling outage transferred to<br />

implementation of “refueling outage” of<br />

the same plant or another Magnox North<br />

plant?<br />

The <strong>Outage</strong> teams use the site OEF<br />

process to capture any non conformance<br />

with the <strong>Outage</strong> plan or any loss or event.<br />

All items/learning captured are then<br />

reviewed and links to the OEF is created<br />

to the <strong>Outage</strong> program such that learning<br />

can be presented to <strong>Outage</strong> teams “just in<br />

time” at the next outage. This process was<br />

observed by WANO to be a best practice.<br />

A program of reviews is completed<br />

with each of the <strong>Outage</strong> Project leads with<br />

their area team to identify lessons learnt.<br />

The review process is then used to feed<br />

into the next outages gate review process<br />

and project leads provide a presentation<br />

to the site lead team on lessons learnt and<br />

how these will be addressed in the next<br />

outage.<br />

3. How does Magnox North ensure<br />

continued availability of experienced<br />

staff at its different nuclear power plants<br />

during outage? How is the attrition of<br />

staff made up by new personnel?<br />

It is the M&O contractors responsibility<br />

to manage the availability of resources<br />

and experienced staff.<br />

The M&O contractor (Magnox North<br />

Sites) arrangements are encapsulating<br />

under the UK <strong>Nuclear</strong> Site license<br />

requirements to manage changes to<br />

resources and management of Core<br />

Competence.<br />

With the sites now at the end of their<br />

operational lives (both sites have less than<br />

4 years of operational service left) they<br />

have in place transition plans to manage<br />

the resources through to the end of life.<br />

These plans include:-<br />

• Retentions of some specific skilled<br />

employees with specialist skilled<br />

staff<br />

• Agreements with some OEM’s to<br />

ensure their skills are retained<br />

(Continued on page 30)<br />

<strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Journal</strong>, May-June 2009 www.nuclearplantjournal.com 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!