You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
...<br />
One enters the cemetery via an old building with a façade which is the twin sister of the Central<br />
Registry façade. <strong>The</strong>re are the same three black stone steps, the same ancient door in the middle, the same<br />
five narrow windows above. Apart from the great two-leaved door alongside the façade, the only<br />
observable difference would be the sign above the entrance, in the same enamelled lettering, that says<br />
General Cemetery. <strong>The</strong> large door was closed many years ago, when it was clear that access through there<br />
had become impracticable, that it had ceased satisfactorily to fulfil the end for which it had been intended,<br />
that is, to allow easy passage not only for the dead and their companions, but also for those who would<br />
visit the dead afterwards. Like all cemeteries in this or any other world, it was tiny when it started, a<br />
small patch of land on the outskirts of what was still the embryo of a city, turned to face the open air of the<br />
fields, but later, alas, with the passing of time, the inevitable happened, it kept growing and growing and<br />
growing, until it became the immense necropolis that it is today. At first, it was surrounded by a wall and,<br />
for generations, whenever the pressure inside began to hinder both the orderly accommodation of the dead<br />
and the free circulation of the living, they did the same as in the Central Registry, they would demolish the<br />
walls and rebuild them a little farther on. One day, it must be close to four centuries ago, the then keeper<br />
of the cemetery had the idea of leaving it open on all sides, apart from the area facing onto the street,<br />
alleging that this was the only way to rekindle the sentimental relationship between those inside and those<br />
outside, much diminished at the time, as anyone could see just by looking at the neglected state of the<br />
graves, especially the oldest ones. He believed that, although walls served the positive aims of hygiene<br />
and decorum, ultimately, they had the perverse effect of aiding forgetfulness, which is hardly surprising,<br />
given the popular wisdom which has declared, since time began, that what the eye doesn't see the heart<br />
doesn't grieve over. We have many reasons to think that the motives behind the Registrar's decision to<br />
break with tradition and routine and to unify the archives of the dead and of the living, thus reintegrating<br />
human society in the specific documentary area under his jurisdiction, were purely internal. It is,<br />
therefore, all the more difficult for us to understand why no one immediately applied the earlier lesson<br />
provided by a humble, primitive cemetery keeper, who, as was only natural in his line of work and<br />
bearing in mind the times he lived in, was doubtless not particularly well educated, but was, nevertheless,<br />
a man of revolutionary instincts, and who, sad to say, has not even been given a decent gravestone to point<br />
out the fact to future generations. On the contrary, for four centuries now, curses, insults, calumnies and<br />
humiliations have been heaped upon the memory of the unfortunate innovator, for he is held to be the<br />
person historically responsible for the present state of the necropolis, which is described as disastrous<br />
and chaotic, mostly because not only does the General Cemetery still have no walls about it but it could<br />
never possibly be walled in again. <strong>All</strong>ow us to explain. We said earlier that the cemetery grew, not, of<br />
course, because of some intrinsic reproductive powers of its own, as though, if you will permit us a<br />
somewhat macabre example, the dead had engendered more dead, but simply because the city's<br />
population grew and so therefore did its size. Even when the General Cemetery was still surrounded by<br />
walls, something occurred which, in the language of municipal bureaucracy, is called an urban<br />
demographic explosion, and this happened more than once and in successive ages. Little by little, people<br />
came to live in the wide fields behind the cemetery, small groups of houses appeared, villages, hamlets,<br />
second homes, which grew in turn, occasionally contiguous, but still leaving between them large empty<br />
spaces, which were used as farmland or woods or pasture or areas of scrub. Those were the areas into<br />
which the General Cemetery advanced when its walls were demolished. Like floodwaters that begin by<br />
encroaching on the lowlying land, snaking along valleys and then, slowly, creeping up hillsides, so the<br />
graves gained ground, often to the detriment of agriculture, for the besieged owners had no alternative but