29.11.2014 Views

HAMLYN - College of Social Sciences and International Studies ...

HAMLYN - College of Social Sciences and International Studies ...

HAMLYN - College of Social Sciences and International Studies ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Human Rights<br />

process. A "Henry VIII clause" is something close to overriding<br />

legislation by Ministerial decree. It is true that governments<br />

control the legislature almost completely <strong>and</strong> can force through<br />

virtually any primary legislation, but Ministerial power<br />

exercised through a "Henry VIII clause" by way <strong>of</strong> delegated<br />

legislation is even more dramatic.<br />

When considering the democratic deficit involved in remedial<br />

orders under the Act, it is worth noting that such an order can<br />

contain "such incidental, supplemental, consequential or transitional<br />

provision as the person making it considers appropriate"<br />

33 ; it can be retrospective in its effect 34 ; <strong>and</strong> it can amend<br />

primary legislation other than that which contains the incompatible<br />

legislation. 35 It is a very far-reaching power. 36<br />

Such an amending statutory instrument normally 37 requires<br />

an affirmative resolution in both Houses <strong>of</strong> Parliament, but that<br />

is saying very little. Governments have no difficulty in getting<br />

such an affirmative resolution. The Act provides for a special<br />

procedure for fast track "remedial orders" 38 the main ingredient<br />

<strong>of</strong> which is that the order has to be laid before parliament for a<br />

longer than usual period <strong>of</strong> time, so giving more time for<br />

opposition to build up. But since the government can normally<br />

force anything through, this extra time is unlikely to be <strong>of</strong> much<br />

consequence.<br />

A court's declaration <strong>of</strong> incompatibility creates no duty on the<br />

Government to act by way <strong>of</strong> fast-track remedial action. The Act<br />

says that the fast track procedure can be activated where the<br />

Minister "considers that there are compelling reasons" 39 —a<br />

formula that slightly tips the balance against action. There have<br />

to be not merely reasons but "compelling reasons".<br />

33 Human Rights Act 1998, Sched. 2, para. l(l)(a).<br />

34 ibid., para. l(l)(b). But no one can be found guilty <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fence solely as the<br />

result <strong>of</strong> the retrospective effect [ibid., para. 1(4)).<br />

35 ibid., para. l(2)(a).<br />

36 The European Communities Act 1972, s. 2(2) permits a statutory instrument to<br />

give effect to a Directive by amending an Act <strong>of</strong> Parliament. For commentary<br />

on the Henry VIII clause aspects <strong>of</strong> the 1998 Act see, for instance, D. Feldman,<br />

"The Human Rights Act 1998 <strong>and</strong> constitutional principles", [1999] L.S. 165 at<br />

187-191.<br />

37 In cases <strong>of</strong> urgency this requirement is waived but the remedial order lapses<br />

after 120 days unless it has been approved by Parliament. (Schedule 2, para.<br />

4.)<br />

38 Schedule 2.<br />

39 s. 10(l)(b).<br />

86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!