178 MECHANISM OF ACTION IN MODEL ORGANISMS to alter the function of a s<strong>in</strong>gle gene product with<strong>in</strong> the context of a complex cellular environment. Once hooked <strong>in</strong>to a pathway, many new genomics tools can be brought to bear on any given problem. Advances <strong>in</strong> Drosophila and C. elegans research allow the comb<strong>in</strong>ation of genome sequence <strong>in</strong>formation, genome-wide cDNAs, mapp<strong>in</strong>g prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>teractions, gene expression profiles and genome-wide mutations <strong>in</strong> an unprecedented dissection of a complex organism. In general, the challenge of a model system biology group <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dustrial sett<strong>in</strong>g is to balance throughput with quality biological <strong>in</strong>formation. There is a significant amount of potential to enhance all target validation methodologies, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g model systems. Improvement <strong>in</strong> automation, m<strong>in</strong>iaturization and visualization of biological processes offers the most promise. Studies with compounds can be <strong>in</strong>tegrated with many of the evolv<strong>in</strong>g genomics and proteomics tools. This chapter summarized the advantages of C. elegans and Drosophila as model systems <strong>in</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g a broad spectrum of MOA and lead compound identification issues. However, model organism approaches when comb<strong>in</strong>ed with other methods, <strong>in</strong> parallel or circuit, can produce a complete biochemical and genetic profile of the drug target prote<strong>in</strong>(s). There are many evolv<strong>in</strong>g approaches <strong>in</strong> chemical genomics, such as prote<strong>in</strong> profil<strong>in</strong>g and cell-based chemical screen<strong>in</strong>gs, that were beyond the scope of this review chapter (Zheng and Chan, 2002). The technologies developed for work <strong>in</strong> S. cerevisiae rema<strong>in</strong> the model of researchers <strong>in</strong> the multicellular world (see Chapter 2). 6.11 Acknowledgments Lisa Moore carried out the fly experiments shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 6.2. The authors would like to thank Jenny Kopczynski, Ross Francis, Garth McGrath, Steve Doberste<strong>in</strong>, Dan Curtis, Mark Cockett and Petra Ross-MacDonald for ideas and <strong>in</strong>put, and Ben Burley for technical assistance. Hong Xiao, Bo Guan, Libeng Chen and Tiffany Vora conducted experiments <strong>in</strong> the S2 cell system. The authors would like to thank Becket Feierbach for her thoughtful manuscript review and helpful ideas. 6.12 References Abraham, R. T., Acquarone, M., Andersen, A., Asensi, A., Belle, R., Berger, F., Bergounioux, C., et al. (1995). Cellular effects of olomouc<strong>in</strong>e, an <strong>in</strong>hibitor of cycl<strong>in</strong>dependent k<strong>in</strong>ases. Biol. Cell 83, 105–120. Arbeitman, M. N., Furlong, E. E., Imam, F., Johnson, E., Null, B. H., Baker, B. S., Krasnow, M. A., et al. (2002). Gene expression dur<strong>in</strong>g the life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 297, 2270–2275.
REFERENCES 179 Aust<strong>in</strong>, J. and Kimble, J. (1989). Transcript analysis of glp-1 and l<strong>in</strong>-12, homologous genes required for cell <strong>in</strong>teractions dur<strong>in</strong>g development of C. elegans. Cell 58, 565–571. Basson, M. E., Thorsness, M. and R<strong>in</strong>e, J. (1986). Saccharomyces cerevisiae conta<strong>in</strong>s two functional genes encod<strong>in</strong>g 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 5563–5567. Beitel, G. J., Clark, S. G. and Horvitz, H. R. (1990). Caenorhabditis elegans ras gene let-60 acts as a switch <strong>in</strong> the pathway of vulval <strong>in</strong>duction. Nature 348, 503–509. Brune, K. (2002). Next generation of everyday analgesics. Am. J. Ther. 9, 215–223. Bynum, W. F. (1970). Chemical structure and pharmacological action: a chapter <strong>in</strong> the history of 19th century molecular pharmacology. Bull. Hist. Med. 44, 518–538. Capdeville, R., Buchdunger, E., Zimmermann, J. and Matter, A. (2002). Glivec (STI571, imat<strong>in</strong>ib), a rationally developed, targeted anticancer drug. Nat. Rev. <strong>Drug</strong> Discov. 1, 493–502. Caplen, N. J., Fleenor, J., Fire, A. and Morgan, R. A. (2000). dsRNA-mediated gene silenc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> cultured Drosophila cells: a tissue culture model for the analysis of RNA <strong>in</strong>terference. Gene 252, 95–105. Caplen, N. J., Parrish, S., Imani, F., Fire, A. and Morgan, R. A. (2001). Specific <strong>in</strong>hibition of gene expression by small double-stranded RNAs <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vertebrate and vertebrate systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 9742–9747. Caponigro, F. (2002). Farnesyl transferase <strong>in</strong>hibitors: a major breakthrough <strong>in</strong> anticancer therapy? Naples, 12 April 2002. Anticancer <strong>Drug</strong>s 13, 891–897. Chandrasekharan, N. V., Dai, H., Roos, K. L., Evanson, N. K., Tomsik, J., Elton, T. S. and Simmons, D. L. (2002). From the Cover: COX-3, a cyclooxygenase-1 variant <strong>in</strong>hibited by acetam<strong>in</strong>ophen and other analgesic/antipyretic drugs: clon<strong>in</strong>g, structure, and expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 13 926–13 931. Choe, K. M., Werner, T., Stoven, S., Hultmark, D. and Anderson, K. V. (2002). Requirement for a peptidoglycan recognition prote<strong>in</strong> (PGRP) <strong>in</strong> Relish activation and antibacterial immune responses <strong>in</strong> Drosophila. Science 296, 359–362. Choy, R. K. and Thomas, J. H. (1999). Fluoxet<strong>in</strong>e-resistant mutants <strong>in</strong> C. elegans def<strong>in</strong>e a novel family of transmembrane prote<strong>in</strong>s. Mol. Cell 4, 143–152. Clemens, J. C., Worby, C. A., Simonson-Leff, N., Muda, M., Maehama, T., Hemm<strong>in</strong>gs, B. A. and Dixon, J. E. (2000). Use of double-stranded RNA <strong>in</strong>terference <strong>in</strong> Drosophila cell l<strong>in</strong>es to dissect signal transduction pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6499– 6503. Culetto, E. and Sattelle, D. B. (2000). A role for Caenorhabditis elegans <strong>in</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g the function and <strong>in</strong>teractions of human disease genes. Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 869–877. Cully, D. F., Vassilatis, D. K., Liu, K. K., Paress, P. S., Van der Ploeg, L. H., Schaeffer, J. M. and Arena, J. P. (1994). Clon<strong>in</strong>g of an avermect<strong>in</strong>-sensitive glutamate-gated chloride channel from Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 371, 707–711. Drews, J. and Ryser, S. (1997). The role of <strong>in</strong>novation <strong>in</strong> drug development. Nat. Biotechnol. 15, 1318–1319. Elbashir, S. M., Harborth, J., Lendeckel, W., Yalc<strong>in</strong>, A., Weber, K. and Tuschl, T. (2001). Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA <strong>in</strong>terference <strong>in</strong> cultured mammalian cells. Nature 411, 494–498. Esler, W. P. and Wolfe, M. S. (2001). A portrait of Alzheimer secretases – new features and familiar faces. Science 293, 1449–1454. Esler, W. P., Kimberly, W. T., Ostaszewski, B. L., Diehl, T. S., Moore, C. L., Tsai, J. Y., Rahmati, T., et al. (2000). Transition-state analogue <strong>in</strong>hibitors of gamma-secretase b<strong>in</strong>d directly to presenil<strong>in</strong>-1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 428–434.
- Page 1 and 2:
Model Organisms in Drug Discovery M
- Page 3 and 4:
Copyright u 2003 John Wiley & Sons
- Page 5 and 6:
Contents List of contributors .....
- Page 7 and 8:
CONTENTS ix 7 Genetics and Genomics
- Page 9 and 10:
List of Contributors Hector Beltran
- Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS xiii Stefan Sc
- Page 13 and 14:
1 Introduction to Model Systems in
- Page 15 and 16:
Organism INTEGRATING MODEL ORGANISM
- Page 17 and 18:
INTEGRATING MODEL ORGANISM RESEARCH
- Page 19 and 20:
INTEGRATING MODEL ORGANISM RESEARCH
- Page 21 and 22:
10 GROWING YEAST FOR FUN AND PROFIT
- Page 23 and 24:
12 GROWING YEAST FOR FUN AND PROFIT
- Page 25 and 26:
14 GROWING YEAST FOR FUN AND PROFIT
- Page 27 and 28:
16 GROWING YEAST FOR FUN AND PROFIT
- Page 29 and 30:
18 GROWING YEAST FOR FUN AND PROFIT
- Page 31 and 32:
20 GROWING YEAST FOR FUN AND PROFIT
- Page 33 and 34:
22 GROWING YEAST FOR FUN AND PROFIT
- Page 35 and 36:
24 GROWING YEAST FOR FUN AND PROFIT
- Page 37 and 38:
26 GROWING YEAST FOR FUN AND PROFIT
- Page 39 and 40:
28 GROWING YEAST FOR FUN AND PROFIT
- Page 41 and 42:
30 GROWING YEAST FOR FUN AND PROFIT
- Page 43 and 44:
32 GROWING YEAST FOR FUN AND PROFIT
- Page 45 and 46:
34 GROWING YEAST FOR FUN AND PROFIT
- Page 47 and 48:
36 GROWING YEAST FOR FUN AND PROFIT
- Page 49 and 50:
38 GROWING YEAST FOR FUN AND PROFIT
- Page 51 and 52:
3 Caenorhabditis elegans Functional
- Page 53 and 54:
THE DRUG DISCOVERY PROCESS 43 thoug
- Page 55 and 56:
multivulva phenotype of Ras gain-of
- Page 57 and 58:
disease. These molecular targets ar
- Page 59 and 60:
FROM DISEASE TO TARGET 49 Figure 3.
- Page 61 and 62:
FROM DISEASE TO TARGET 51 Figure 3.
- Page 63 and 64:
signaling pathway. The third catego
- Page 65 and 66:
FROM DISEASE TO TARGET 55 resistant
- Page 67 and 68:
phenomenon was first observed in C.
- Page 69 and 70:
profiles. The C. elegans gene expre
- Page 71 and 72:
emerging technologies. Forward gene
- Page 73 and 74:
The compound library LEAD DISCOVERY
- Page 75 and 76:
LEAD DISCOVERY 65 previous section,
- Page 77 and 78:
LEAD DISCOVERY 67 Figure 3.5 Distri
- Page 79 and 80:
Compound learning set for assay val
- Page 81 and 82:
10 000-15 000 human drug targets ar
- Page 83 and 84:
transporter itself. The SSRIs that
- Page 85 and 86:
REFERENCES 75 de Montigny, C., Blie
- Page 87 and 88:
REFERENCES 77 Lewis, J. A., Wu, C.
- Page 89 and 90:
REFERENCES 79 Tissenbaum, H. A. and
- Page 91 and 92:
82 DROSOPHILA AS A TOOL FOR DRUG DI
- Page 93 and 94:
84 DROSOPHILA AS A TOOL FOR DRUG DI
- Page 95 and 96:
86 DROSOPHILA AS A TOOL FOR DRUG DI
- Page 97 and 98:
88 DROSOPHILA AS A TOOL FOR DRUG DI
- Page 99 and 100:
90 DROSOPHILA AS A TOOL FOR DRUG DI
- Page 101 and 102:
92 DROSOPHILA AS A TOOL FOR DRUG DI
- Page 103 and 104:
94 DROSOPHILA AS A TOOL FOR DRUG DI
- Page 105 and 106:
96 DROSOPHILA AS A TOOL FOR DRUG DI
- Page 107 and 108:
98 DROSOPHILA AS A TOOL FOR DRUG DI
- Page 109 and 110:
100 DROSOPHILA AS A TOOL FOR DRUG D
- Page 111 and 112:
102 DROSOPHILA AS A TOOL FOR DRUG D
- Page 113 and 114:
104 DROSOPHILA AS A TOOL FOR DRUG D
- Page 115 and 116:
106 DROSOPHILA AS A TOOL FOR DRUG D
- Page 117 and 118:
108 DROSOPHILA AS A TOOL FOR DRUG D
- Page 119 and 120:
110 DROSOPHILA AS A TOOL FOR DRUG D
- Page 121 and 122:
112 DROSOPHILA AS A TOOL FOR DRUG D
- Page 123 and 124:
114 DROSOPHILA AS A TOOL FOR DRUG D
- Page 125 and 126:
116 DROSOPHILA AS A TOOL FOR DRUG D
- Page 127 and 128:
5 Drosophila - a Model System for T
- Page 129 and 130:
EVOLUTIONARY CONSERVATION OF DISEAS
- Page 131 and 132:
EVOLUTIONARY CONSERVATION OF DISEAS
- Page 133 and 134:
EVOLUTIONARY CONSERVATION OF DISEAS
- Page 135 and 136: EVOLUTIONARY CONSERVATION OF DISEAS
- Page 137 and 138: TARGET IDENTIFICATION/TARGET VALIDA
- Page 139 and 140: TARGET IDENTIFICATION/TARGET VALIDA
- Page 141 and 142: TARGET IDENTIFICATION/TARGET VALIDA
- Page 143 and 144: TARGET IDENTIFICATION/TARGET VALIDA
- Page 145 and 146: TARGET IDENTIFICATION/TARGET VALIDA
- Page 147 and 148: TARGET IDENTIFICATION/TARGET VALIDA
- Page 149 and 150: TARGET IDENTIFICATION/TARGET VALIDA
- Page 151 and 152: CHEMICAL GENETICS 143 acid identity
- Page 153 and 154: 3. A hit identifies a biologically
- Page 155 and 156: about their function in a multicell
- Page 157 and 158: REFERENCES 149 Han, Z. S., Enslen,
- Page 159 and 160: REFERENCES 151 Rintelen, F., Stocke
- Page 161 and 162: 6 Mechanism of Action in Model Orga
- Page 163 and 164: INTRODUCTION TO COMPOUND DEVELOPMEN
- Page 165 and 166: MODEL ORGANISMS ARRIVE ON THE SCENE
- Page 167 and 168: ELUCIDATING THE MECHANISM OF COMPOU
- Page 169 and 170: ELUCIDATING THE MECHANISM OF COMPOU
- Page 171 and 172: A CASE STUDY FOR ALZHEIMER’S DISE
- Page 173 and 174: A CASE STUDY FOR ALZHEIMER’S DISE
- Page 175 and 176: A CASE STUDY FOR ALZHEIMER’S DISE
- Page 177 and 178: A CASE STUDY FOR ALZHEIMER’S DISE
- Page 179 and 180: NEW CHEMICAL GENETIC STRATEGIES 171
- Page 181 and 182: A CASE STUDY FOR INNATE IMMUNITY 17
- Page 183 and 184: GLOBAL GENE EXPRESSION STUDIES IN M
- Page 185: As described above, the extensive i
- Page 189 and 190: REFERENCES 181 Hughes, T. R., Marto
- Page 191 and 192: REFERENCES 183 Sin, N., Meng, L., W
- Page 193 and 194: 186 GENETICS AND GENOMICS IN THE ZE
- Page 195 and 196: 188 GENETICS AND GENOMICS IN THE ZE
- Page 197 and 198: 190 GENETICS AND GENOMICS IN THE ZE
- Page 199 and 200: 192 GENETICS AND GENOMICS IN THE ZE
- Page 201 and 202: 194 GENETICS AND GENOMICS IN THE ZE
- Page 203 and 204: 196 GENETICS AND GENOMICS IN THE ZE
- Page 205 and 206: 198 GENETICS AND GENOMICS IN THE ZE
- Page 207 and 208: 200 GENETICS AND GENOMICS IN THE ZE
- Page 209 and 210: 8 Lipid Metabolism and Signaling in
- Page 211 and 212: FISH AS A MODEL ORGANISM 205 genes
- Page 213 and 214: LIPID METABOLISM SCREEN 207 transpo
- Page 215 and 216: LIPID METABOLISM SCREEN 209 Figure
- Page 217 and 218: the embryo media containing radioac
- Page 219 and 220: ZEBRAFISH AS A MODEL SYSTEM 213 Fig
- Page 221 and 222: ZEBRAFISH AS A MODEL SYSTEM 215 Reg
- Page 223 and 224: aspirin, which has potent inhibitor
- Page 225 and 226: REFERENCES 219 Chau, I. and Cunning
- Page 227 and 228: REFERENCES 221 Patrono, C., Patrign
- Page 229 and 230: 224 CHEMICAL MUTAGENESIS IN THE MOU
- Page 231 and 232: 226 CHEMICAL MUTAGENESIS IN THE MOU
- Page 233 and 234: 228 CHEMICAL MUTAGENESIS IN THE MOU
- Page 235 and 236: 230 CHEMICAL MUTAGENESIS IN THE MOU
- Page 237 and 238:
232 CHEMICAL MUTAGENESIS IN THE MOU
- Page 239 and 240:
234 CHEMICAL MUTAGENESIS IN THE MOU
- Page 241 and 242:
236 CHEMICAL MUTAGENESIS IN THE MOU
- Page 243 and 244:
238 CHEMICAL MUTAGENESIS IN THE MOU
- Page 245 and 246:
240 CHEMICAL MUTAGENESIS IN THE MOU
- Page 247 and 248:
242 CHEMICAL MUTAGENESIS IN THE MOU
- Page 249 and 250:
244 CHEMICAL MUTAGENESIS IN THE MOU
- Page 251 and 252:
246 CHEMICAL MUTAGENESIS IN THE MOU
- Page 253 and 254:
248 CHEMICAL MUTAGENESIS IN THE MOU
- Page 255 and 256:
250 CHEMICAL MUTAGENESIS IN THE MOU
- Page 257 and 258:
252 SATURATION SCREENING OF DRUGGAB
- Page 259 and 260:
254 SATURATION SCREENING OF DRUGGAB
- Page 261 and 262:
256 SATURATION SCREENING OF DRUGGAB
- Page 263 and 264:
258 SATURATION SCREENING OF DRUGGAB
- Page 265 and 266:
260 SATURATION SCREENING OF DRUGGAB
- Page 267 and 268:
262 SATURATION SCREENING OF DRUGGAB
- Page 269 and 270:
264 SATURATION SCREENING OF DRUGGAB
- Page 271 and 272:
266 SATURATION SCREENING OF DRUGGAB
- Page 273 and 274:
268 SATURATION SCREENING OF DRUGGAB
- Page 275 and 276:
270 SATURATION SCREENING OF DRUGGAB
- Page 277 and 278:
272 SATURATION SCREENING OF DRUGGAB
- Page 279 and 280:
274 SATURATION SCREENING OF DRUGGAB
- Page 281 and 282:
276 SATURATION SCREENING OF DRUGGAB
- Page 283 and 284:
278 SATURATION SCREENING OF DRUGGAB
- Page 285 and 286:
280 INDEX bupropion 92 busulfan 143
- Page 287 and 288:
282 INDEX Dscam 171 dual-energy X-r
- Page 289 and 290:
284 INDEX L-685,818 16 lead discove
- Page 291 and 292:
286 INDEX protein function 19-22 pr
- Page 293:
288 INDEX yeast (continued) functio