Model Organisms in Drug Discovery
Model Organisms in Drug Discovery
Model Organisms in Drug Discovery
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
242 CHEMICAL MUTAGENESIS IN THE MOUSE<br />
power of this approach, e.g. dissection of the ras signall<strong>in</strong>g pathway (Gaul et<br />
al., 1993). Secondly, a screen for medically relevant functions <strong>in</strong> mammals can<br />
be designed to improve a disease phenotype caused by the primary genetic<br />
defect, thus identify<strong>in</strong>g ‘health genes’ rather than ‘disease genes’. It can be<br />
assumed that players identified <strong>in</strong> such a design are prime candidates for<br />
pharmacological <strong>in</strong>tervention.<br />
An illustration of this approach is identification of the locus Mom (modifier<br />
of m<strong>in</strong>), which <strong>in</strong>fluences the phenotype of the mutant l<strong>in</strong>e M<strong>in</strong> (Moser et al.,<br />
1990); M<strong>in</strong> carries a mutation <strong>in</strong> the mouse homolog of the human familial<br />
polyposis gene (Apc) and suffers from multiple <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al polyps; Mom<br />
strongly modifies the extent and progression of this polyposis. The Mom locus<br />
encodes the secretory phospholipase Pla2g2aI, which could be shown <strong>in</strong><br />
transgenic rescue experiments to provide at least one component of the<br />
modifier function (Cormier et al., 1997; 2000). The Mom locus is an allele that<br />
occurred spontaneously, but similar approaches are under <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>in</strong><br />
several laboratories us<strong>in</strong>g ENU-<strong>in</strong>duced modifiers.<br />
9.5 The art of screen design: phenotyp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Whatever the genetic design of a screen, the right phenotyp<strong>in</strong>g protocol is a<br />
prerequisite for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formative mutants that will lead to the<br />
identification of novel molecular pathways. The art of design<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
implement<strong>in</strong>g a successful screen lies <strong>in</strong> the choice of the appropriate target<br />
phenotype, comb<strong>in</strong>ed with the establishment of scalable comb<strong>in</strong>ations of<br />
primary and secondary assays to detect this phenotype sensitively and<br />
specifically.<br />
An excellent example is isolation of the mutant clock, which led to<br />
identification of the first gene affect<strong>in</strong>g circadian rhythm <strong>in</strong> mammals<br />
(Vitaterna et al., 1994). The assay employed – measurement of the circadian<br />
activity us<strong>in</strong>g a computer-monitored runn<strong>in</strong>g wheel – is straightforward,<br />
scalable and very specific, although great care had to be taken to establish<br />
normal ranges and basel<strong>in</strong>es. In contrast, the measurement of body weight<br />
would not be sufficient to identify specifically the lean animals with reduced<br />
body fat. Many animals <strong>in</strong>itially would score positively, thus obscur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
desired mutants, because there are many reasons for a mouse to have lower<br />
body weight than normal, e.g. non-genetic runts and growth retardation<br />
secondary to many other genetic defects.<br />
Thus, a typical screen<strong>in</strong>g protocol employs several levels of activities. The<br />
primary screen should employ simple parameters and assays that have a high<br />
sensitivity for rapid and efficient enrichment of candidate mutants with altered<br />
physiology <strong>in</strong> the areas of <strong>in</strong>terest. Each ‘hit’ <strong>in</strong> these crude but sensitive<br />
primary assays has to be followed up with more elaborate assays of higher