a thesis - Institute of Advanced Legal Studies
a thesis - Institute of Advanced Legal Studies
a thesis - Institute of Advanced Legal Studies
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
92 IMPLIED TRUSTS.<br />
6. Testator directs his executors to lay out 30,000/. in land, and<br />
to pay the income to A. for life, with remainder to a charity. The<br />
executors do not actually lay out the money before A.'s death.<br />
The gift to the charity failing under the Charitable Uses Act,<br />
testator's next <strong>of</strong> kin are entitled to the 30,000/. Cogan v. Stephens<br />
(1835), 1 Beav. 482, n.<br />
7. Testatrix gives B. a promissory note " for the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />
enabling B. to present to either branch <strong>of</strong> my family, and principal<br />
and interest therein, as B. may consider most prudent." This<br />
being a trust which cannot be executed, B. holds the note in trust<br />
for testatrix's estate. Stubbs v. Sargon (1838), 3 My. & Or. 507.<br />
(c) Trust Executed without Exhausting Property.<br />
8. A wife mortgages her estate to secure her husband's debt,<br />
and the equity <strong>of</strong> redemption is reserved to the heirs <strong>of</strong> the husband.<br />
The husband holds the property in trust for the wife and<br />
her heirs. Brendv. Brend (1683), 1 Yern. 213; <strong>of</strong>. Huntingdon v.<br />
Huntingdon (1702), 2 Br. P. C. Toml. 1; and Jackson v. Innes<br />
(1819), 1 Bligh, 104.<br />
9. A. devises real estate to a trustee on trust to pay his debts.<br />
If after paying all A.'s debts there is any surplus, the trustee<br />
holds it in trust for the heir. King v. Denison (1813), 1 Y. & B.<br />
279; In re West, (1900) 1 Ch. 84, is to the like effect.<br />
10. A., being in want <strong>of</strong> money, induces his wife to assign to<br />
him a leasehold house to enable him to raise money by mortgaging<br />
it. A., after effecting the mortgage, holds the equity <strong>of</strong> redemption<br />
in trust for his wife. In re Duke <strong>of</strong> Maryborough, (1894) 2<br />
Ch. 133.<br />
11. A fund is raised by subscription for the maintenance <strong>of</strong><br />
two distressed ladies, a portion <strong>of</strong> which remains unapplied at the<br />
death <strong>of</strong> the survivor. There is a resulting trust <strong>of</strong> the balance <strong>of</strong><br />
the fund for the subscribers to it. In re the Trusts <strong>of</strong> the Abbott<br />
Fund, (1900) 2 Ch. 326.<br />
Where, however, the owner appears to intend to dispose <strong>of</strong> the<br />
whole beneficial interest by the transfer there will be no resulting<br />
trust, although the transfer is made for a particular object which is