01.12.2014 Views

a thesis - Institute of Advanced Legal Studies

a thesis - Institute of Advanced Legal Studies

a thesis - Institute of Advanced Legal Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INVALIDATING CAUSES. 83<br />

UNLAWFUL PURPOSE GENERALLY.<br />

Trusts invoking a Perpetuity.—Any trust the purpose <strong>of</strong> which<br />

is prohibited by law is void, and since the law prohibits any disposition<br />

<strong>of</strong> property which renders it inalienable in perpetuity, a<br />

trust which <strong>of</strong>fends the rule against perpetuities is void.<br />

The rule as established in the case <strong>of</strong> Cadell v. Palmer (1833,<br />

7 Bligh, N. S. 202) may be stated as follows :—<br />

" Every limitation <strong>of</strong> either real or personal property is void,<br />

if the vesting in the case <strong>of</strong> real property <strong>of</strong> an estate in fee simple<br />

or fee tail, or in the case <strong>of</strong> personal property <strong>of</strong> an absolute<br />

interest in the same, is or may possibly be thereby postponed for<br />

longer than a period comprising the duration <strong>of</strong> the lives <strong>of</strong> any<br />

number <strong>of</strong> ascertainable persons in existence at the date when the<br />

limitation comes into operation, and a further period <strong>of</strong> twenty-one<br />

years from the death <strong>of</strong> the last survivor <strong>of</strong> such persons, without<br />

reference to the infancy <strong>of</strong> any person ; provided that the property<br />

may be limited to vest in a person en venire sa mere at the expiration<br />

<strong>of</strong> such period."<br />

The following are recent cases illustrating the application <strong>of</strong><br />

the rule to trusts :—<br />

Illustrations.<br />

1. Testator gives his real and personal estate to trustees in<br />

trust for A. for life, and after A.'s death in trust for all her sons<br />

and daughters who shall attain the age <strong>of</strong> twenty-two. At the<br />

testator's death A. has no child who has attained the age <strong>of</strong><br />

twenty-two. The trust for A.'s children is void for remoteness.<br />

Thomas v. Wilberforce (1862), 31 Beav. 299.<br />

2. Real estate is limited to the use <strong>of</strong> trustees for 500 years and,<br />

subject thereto, to the use <strong>of</strong> A. for life, remainder to his first and<br />

other sons in tail, remainder to B. for life, remainder to his first<br />

and other sons in tail, remainders over; and a power is given to<br />

the trustees during the minority <strong>of</strong> any person from time to time<br />

to take possession <strong>of</strong> and manage the estate. The power is void<br />

for remoteness. Floyer v. Banks (1869), L. E. 8 Eq. 115.<br />

3. Testator gives 3,OOOZ. to A. for life, and after A.'s death in<br />

trust for all the children <strong>of</strong> A. who shall attain the age <strong>of</strong> twentyo<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!