01.12.2014 Views

a thesis - Institute of Advanced Legal Studies

a thesis - Institute of Advanced Legal Studies

a thesis - Institute of Advanced Legal Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14 TRUSTS IN GENERAL.<br />

distinction as Mr. Justice Story does, by the accustomed anti<strong>thesis</strong><br />

"express" and "implied," treating resulting and constructive<br />

trusts as subdivisions <strong>of</strong> the latter.<br />

It may be added that the term implied trusts is sometimes<br />

used to designate what are more commonly called " precatory<br />

trusts." Mr. Lewin uses the term in this sense (see 10th ed. 117),<br />

and he treats such trusts as a species <strong>of</strong> those created by act <strong>of</strong> the<br />

party. Mr. W. W. Watson also regards precatory trusts as<br />

implied, and treats them as a sub-class <strong>of</strong> trusts which, though not<br />

express, are such as equity will enforce.<br />

But as Mr. Underhill (6th ed. 9) points out, trusts arising from<br />

precatory words are essentially express trusts—that is to say, they<br />

are expressed, although in ambiguous and uncertain language.<br />

Moreover, the whole <strong>of</strong> the law as to express trusts is applicable to<br />

trusts created by precatory expressions ; and there is, therefore, no<br />

justification for treating them as a separate and distinct class.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!