01.12.2014 Views

a thesis - Institute of Advanced Legal Studies

a thesis - Institute of Advanced Legal Studies

a thesis - Institute of Advanced Legal Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32 EXPRESS TRUSTS.<br />

But there must be an intention to create a trust by the words<br />

used. A transaction will not be deemed to create a trust, whatever<br />

its form may be, unless it appears that a trust was intended.<br />

(Gaskett v. Gaskell (1828), 2 You. & J. 502; Hughes v. Stubbs<br />

(1842), 1 Hare, 476; Smith v. Warde (1845), 15 Sim. 56; In re<br />

Weekes' Settlement, (1897) 1 Ch. 289; and see per Fry, L. J., in<br />

In re Diggles (1888), 39 Ch. D. at p. 258; and per Rigby, L. J.,<br />

in In re Williams, (1897) 2 Oh. at p. 28.) The mere use <strong>of</strong> the<br />

word " trust" will not necessarily create a trust. There is no<br />

magic in the word "trust," said Lord Hagan (7 App. Gas. at<br />

p. 630) ; " in various circumstances it may represent many things."<br />

" An instrument does not become a trust enforceable and cognizable<br />

in a court <strong>of</strong> law because that word is used," said Lord Justice<br />

James (15 Ch. D. at p. 8).<br />

The following cases illustrate this :—<br />

Illustrations.<br />

1. A. directs his agent to purchase stock in the names <strong>of</strong><br />

himself and his wife " in trust" for his infant son. The agent<br />

makes the investment, but no trust is expressed, because the bank<br />

object to trust accounts appearing on their books. A. allows the<br />

stock to remain without any trust being declared, and receives the<br />

dividends down to the date <strong>of</strong> his death. This is not a trust.<br />

Smith v. Warde (1845), 15 Sim. 56.<br />

2. A., after depositing in a savings bank to the full extent<br />

allowed by the act 9 Greo. IV. c. 92, opens another account in the<br />

name <strong>of</strong> "A., in trust for B.," over which he has full control under<br />

the act. His object being to evade the act and not to create a<br />

trust in favour <strong>of</strong> B., the latter is not entitled to the amount<br />

standing to the credit <strong>of</strong> the account at the date <strong>of</strong> A.'s death.<br />

Field v. Lonsdale (1850), 13 Beav. 78.<br />

3. By a royal warrant booty <strong>of</strong> war is granted to the Secretary<br />

<strong>of</strong> State for India " in trust" for the <strong>of</strong>ficers and men <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

forces, to be distributed by the Secretary <strong>of</strong> State or by any other<br />

person he may appoint, according to certain scales and proportions;<br />

any doubt arising to be determined finally by the Secretary <strong>of</strong><br />

State, or by such persons to whom he may refer them, unless the<br />

Queen otherwise orders. This does not create a trust, the Secretary

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!