02.12.2014 Views

2 an introduction to cost terms and purposes - Pearson Learning ...

2 an introduction to cost terms and purposes - Pearson Learning ...

2 an introduction to cost terms and purposes - Pearson Learning ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Benefits of Defining Accounting Terms<br />

M<strong>an</strong>agers, account<strong>an</strong>ts, suppliers, <strong>an</strong>d others will avoid m<strong>an</strong>y problems if they thoroughly<br />

underst<strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong>d agree on the classifications <strong>an</strong>d me<strong>an</strong>ings of the <strong>cost</strong> <strong>terms</strong> introduced<br />

in this chapter <strong>an</strong>d later in this book.<br />

Consider the classification of m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor payroll fringe <strong>cost</strong>s (for example,<br />

employer payments for employee benefits such as Social Security, life insur<strong>an</strong>ce, health<br />

insur<strong>an</strong>ce, <strong>an</strong>d pensions). Some comp<strong>an</strong>ies classify these <strong>cost</strong>s as m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s. In other comp<strong>an</strong>ies, the fringe benefits related <strong>to</strong> direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

labor are treated as <strong>an</strong> additional direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong>. Consider, for example,<br />

a direct laborer, such as a lathe opera<strong>to</strong>r, whose gross wages are computed on the<br />

basis of a stated wage rate of $20 <strong>an</strong> hour <strong>an</strong>d fringe benefits <strong>to</strong>taling, say, $5 per hour.<br />

Some comp<strong>an</strong>ies classify the $20 as direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong> <strong>an</strong>d the $5 as m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

overhead <strong>cost</strong>. Other comp<strong>an</strong>ies classify the entire $25 as direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

labor <strong>cost</strong>. The latter approach is preferable because the stated wage <strong>an</strong>d the<br />

fringe benefit <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong>gether are a fundamental part of acquiring direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

labor services.<br />

Caution: In every situation, pinpoint clearly what direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor<br />

includes <strong>an</strong>d what direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor excludes. Achieving clarity may prevent<br />

disputes regarding <strong>cost</strong>-reimbursement contracts, income tax payments, <strong>an</strong>d labor<br />

union matters. Consider that some countries such as Costa Rica <strong>an</strong>d Mauritius offer subst<strong>an</strong>tial<br />

income tax savings <strong>to</strong> comp<strong>an</strong>ies that locate pl<strong>an</strong>ts within their borders. In some<br />

cases, <strong>to</strong> qualify for the tax benefits, the direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong>s of the pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />

must at least equal a specified percentage of the <strong>to</strong>tal m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s. Disputes<br />

have arisen regarding how <strong>to</strong> calculate the direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor percentage for<br />

qualifying for such tax benefits. For inst<strong>an</strong>ce, are payroll fringe benefits on direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

labor part of direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong>s, or are they part of m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

overhead? Depending on how comp<strong>an</strong>ies classify <strong>cost</strong>s, you c<strong>an</strong> see how they<br />

may show direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor as different percentages of <strong>to</strong>tal m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s. Consider a comp<strong>an</strong>y with $5 million of payroll fringe <strong>cost</strong>s (figures are assumed,<br />

in millions):<br />

Classification A<br />

Classification B<br />

Costs Percentage Costs Percentage<br />

Direct materials $ 40 40% Direct materials $ 40 40%<br />

Direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor 20 20 Direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor 25 25<br />

M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead 40 40 M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead 35 35<br />

Total m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s $100 100% Total m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s $100 100%<br />

Classification A assumes payroll fringe <strong>cost</strong>s are part of m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

In contrast, classification B assumes payroll fringe <strong>cost</strong>s are part of direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

labor <strong>cost</strong>s. If a country set the minimum percentage of direct labor <strong>cost</strong>s at 25%, the<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>y would receive a tax break using classification B, but no tax break using classification<br />

A. In addition <strong>to</strong> fringe benefits, other debated items are compensation for<br />

training time, idle time, vacations, sick leave, <strong>an</strong>d overtime premium. To prevent disputes,<br />

contracts <strong>an</strong>d laws should be as specific as possible regarding definitions <strong>an</strong>d<br />

measurements.<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

44<br />

8<br />

Explain why product<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s are computed in<br />

different ways for<br />

different <strong>purposes</strong><br />

. . . examples are pricing<br />

<strong>an</strong>d product-mix decisions,<br />

government contracts, <strong>an</strong>d<br />

fin<strong>an</strong>cial statements<br />

Different Me<strong>an</strong>ings of Product Costs<br />

M<strong>an</strong>y <strong>cost</strong> <strong>terms</strong> found in practice have ambiguous me<strong>an</strong>ings. Consider the term product<br />

<strong>cost</strong>. A product <strong>cost</strong> is the sum of the <strong>cost</strong>s assigned <strong>to</strong> a product for a specific purpose.<br />

Different <strong>purposes</strong> c<strong>an</strong> result in different measures of product <strong>cost</strong>, as the brackets on the<br />

value chain in Exhibit 2-10 illustrate:<br />

■<br />

Pricing <strong>an</strong>d product-mix decisions. For the <strong>purposes</strong> of making decisions about<br />

pricing <strong>an</strong>d which products provide the most profits, the m<strong>an</strong>ager is interested in the<br />

overall (<strong>to</strong>tal) profitability of different products <strong>an</strong>d, consequently, assigns <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

incurred in all business functions of the value chain <strong>to</strong> the different products.<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!