02.12.2014 Views

2 an introduction to cost terms and purposes - Pearson Learning ...

2 an introduction to cost terms and purposes - Pearson Learning ...

2 an introduction to cost terms and purposes - Pearson Learning ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EXHIBIT 2-4<br />

$160,000<br />

Fixed-Cost Behavior<br />

at Thomas Tr<strong>an</strong>sport<br />

Comp<strong>an</strong>y<br />

Total Fixed Costs<br />

$120,000<br />

$80,000<br />

$40,000<br />

Relev<strong>an</strong>t<br />

R<strong>an</strong>ge<br />

in 2007<br />

$0<br />

120,000 240,000<br />

Miles of Hauling<br />

360,000<br />

trucks that carry agricultural produce <strong>to</strong> market. Each truck has <strong>an</strong>nual fixed rental <strong>cost</strong>s of<br />

$40,000. The maximum <strong>an</strong>nual usage of each truck is 120,000 miles. In the current year<br />

(2007), the predicted combined <strong>to</strong>tal hauling of the two trucks is 170,000 miles.<br />

Exhibit 2-4 shows how <strong>an</strong>nual fixed <strong>cost</strong>s behave at different levels of miles of hauling.<br />

Up <strong>to</strong> 120,000 miles, TTC c<strong>an</strong> operate with one truck; from 120,001 <strong>to</strong> 240,000 miles, it operates<br />

with two trucks; from 240,001 <strong>to</strong> 360,000 miles, it operates with three trucks. This pattern<br />

will continue as TTC adds trucks <strong>to</strong> its fleet <strong>to</strong> provide more miles of hauling. Given the<br />

predicted 170,000-mile usage for 2007, the r<strong>an</strong>ge from 120,001 <strong>to</strong> 240,000 miles hauled is<br />

the r<strong>an</strong>ge in which TTC expects <strong>to</strong> operate, resulting in fixed rental <strong>cost</strong>s of $80,000. Within<br />

this relev<strong>an</strong>t r<strong>an</strong>ge, ch<strong>an</strong>ges in miles hauled will not affect the <strong>an</strong>nual fixed <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

Fixed <strong>cost</strong>s may ch<strong>an</strong>ge from one year <strong>to</strong> the next. For example, if the <strong>to</strong>tal rental fees<br />

of the two refrigerated trucks is increased by $2,000 for 2008, the <strong>to</strong>tal level of fixed <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

will increase <strong>to</strong> $82,000 (all else remaining the same). If that increase occurs, <strong>to</strong>tal rental<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s will be fixed at this new level of $82,000 for 2008 for miles hauled in the 120,001<br />

<strong>to</strong> 240,000 r<strong>an</strong>ge.<br />

The basic assumption of the relev<strong>an</strong>t r<strong>an</strong>ge also applies <strong>to</strong> variable <strong>cost</strong>s. That is, outside<br />

the relev<strong>an</strong>t r<strong>an</strong>ge, variable <strong>cost</strong>s, such as direct materials, may not ch<strong>an</strong>ge proportionately<br />

with ch<strong>an</strong>ges in production volume. For example, above a certain volume, direct<br />

material <strong>cost</strong>s may increase at a lower rate because of price discounts on purchases greater<br />

th<strong>an</strong> a certain qu<strong>an</strong>tity.<br />

Relationships of Types of Costs<br />

We have introduced two major classifications of <strong>cost</strong>s: direct/indirect <strong>an</strong>d variable/fixed.<br />

Costs may simult<strong>an</strong>eously be:<br />

■ Direct <strong>an</strong>d variable<br />

■ Direct <strong>an</strong>d fixed<br />

■ Indirect <strong>an</strong>d variable<br />

■ Indirect <strong>an</strong>d fixed<br />

Exhibit 2-5 shows examples of <strong>cost</strong>s in each of these four <strong>cost</strong> classifications for the BMW X5.<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

34<br />

4<br />

Interpret unit <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

cautiously<br />

. . . for m<strong>an</strong>y decisions,<br />

m<strong>an</strong>agers should use <strong>to</strong>tal<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s, not unit <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

Total Costs <strong>an</strong>d Unit Costs<br />

The preceding section concentrated on the behavior patterns of <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s in relation <strong>to</strong><br />

activity or volume levels. We now consider unit <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

Unit Costs<br />

Generally, the decision maker should think in <strong>terms</strong> of <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s rather th<strong>an</strong> unit <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

In m<strong>an</strong>y decision contexts, however, calculating a unit <strong>cost</strong> is essential. Consider the<br />

chairm<strong>an</strong> of the social committee of a fraternity, who is trying <strong>to</strong> decide whether <strong>to</strong> hire<br />

a musical group for <strong>an</strong> upcoming party. He estimates the <strong>cost</strong> of hiring the group <strong>to</strong> be<br />

$1,000. This knowledge is helpful for the decision, but it is not enough.<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!