You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
16 NIVESHAK<br />
Cover Story<br />
discounted rates; thus increasing the competition<br />
amongst OMCs. A competitive market scenario<br />
will surely lead to process enhancement as well<br />
as product development which would be good<br />
for everyone, a revolution similar to the telecom<br />
revolution.<br />
Auto-Industry’s Take<br />
The auto-industry supported the diesel<br />
deregulation, quoting that things could now be<br />
planned in a better way by the industry with<br />
respect to capacity building as well as by the<br />
consumer with respect to his purchase decision.<br />
Banking Industry’s Take<br />
The banking industry is positive on the diesel<br />
deregulation front as it would benefit economy<br />
leading to a decline in inflation and thus interest<br />
rates which will lead to a low capital cost and an<br />
increased demand for loans.<br />
State’s Says<br />
Apparently the states are not much happy with<br />
this deregulation decision as decrease in the<br />
price of diesel would cost them tax revenue<br />
losses, thus impacting their budgeting and<br />
proposed expenditures.<br />
Way Forward: Pricing still remains an<br />
issue<br />
There is an exigent need for some transparency<br />
in the pricing of diesel and other petroleum<br />
products vis a vis the method followed by the<br />
oil companies. The concept of ‘under-recovery’<br />
has to be given a relook and a better and more<br />
logical price mechanism has to be implemented<br />
so that the benefits of diesel deregulations is<br />
harvested even in the case of volatile and high<br />
crude prices. The concept of under recovery<br />
is very vague and unique in India, it is the<br />
difference between the desired selling price of<br />
the oil companies and the prevailing retail price<br />
in the domestic market.<br />
This ‘desired’ price is calculated on tradeparity<br />
basis that takes into account the landed<br />
cost of imported fuel and the price at which<br />
it is exported by domestic refineries. Presently,<br />
the ratio is 80:20 in favour of landed cost. For<br />
example, if the price on the trade parity basis is<br />
Rs.100 per litre and the domestic selling price is<br />
Rs.80 per litre then the under recovery reflected<br />
in the accounts of these companies is Rs. 20.<br />
But, in India, companies are not directly<br />
importing the refined petroleum products instead<br />
majority of them have developed their own<br />
refineries and they are able to refine products<br />
such as petrol, cooking gas and kerosene from<br />
the imported crude. Given this situation, the<br />
landed cost of imports which includes items<br />
like freight, insurance, custom duties should<br />
not be considered for setting the domestic retail<br />
price. These factors magnify the extent of under<br />
recoveries that the oil companies report.<br />
Therefore, the landed cost of imports inclusive<br />
of above mentioned items and the liveable<br />
should not be considered for fixing the ‘desired<br />
selling price’. The only exception could be a<br />
point where the global crude prices surge to<br />
the abnormal levels and the prices are linked<br />
according to the crude prices. Instead of that,<br />
the below mentioned proposed cost plus<br />
method should be mandated by the government<br />
in order to protect the consumer interest and<br />
promote efficient competition in the sector.<br />
The oil companies harp on “under recoveries”<br />
and always nag about linking the domestic price<br />
with it. The reason being the landed cost which<br />
includes all the duties and liveable actually<br />
serves as a shield to protect their actual losses<br />
from the inefficiencies in their refineries and<br />
NOVEMBER 2014