You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
18<br />
NIVESHAK<br />
GDP’s origins, relevance<br />
FinGyaan<br />
FinGyaan<br />
& alternatives in<br />
today’s world<br />
Has GDP as a criterion to measure economy’s<br />
progress reached the end of its utility? Today<br />
GDP has become the most important measure<br />
of progress in macroeconomics and almost<br />
every country’s economic policies are designed<br />
keeping in mind the GDP targets. Even the debt,<br />
expenditure, tax collection etc. are measured as a<br />
percentage of GDP. The criticism of GDP started in<br />
1970s due to stagflation in advanced economies<br />
and modern problems like increased commuting<br />
time or lower happiness levels which are not<br />
factored in measuring growth. It is criticized for<br />
multiple reasons: one that it doesn’t measure<br />
the value created by economic activity but<br />
measures only the economic output and second<br />
that it doesn’t take into account non-monetary<br />
costs like pollution, economic inequality or<br />
work life balance. There are also critics of GDP<br />
like economists Michael Green who have also<br />
Ashay S Dalvi<br />
K.J Somaiya Institute of Management Studies<br />
proposed alternative methods to measure<br />
progress. His organisation created the Social<br />
Progress Index for non-economic indicators like<br />
medical care and higher education. The present<br />
day universal standard definition of GDP has<br />
certain assumptions about what to be counted<br />
and what not as an economic activity which<br />
has market price. Although in mass production<br />
economy the amount of goods produced such<br />
as steel, cars, machinery etc. can be measured<br />
but in today’s advanced economy there are<br />
very complicated adjustments made to take<br />
into account quality up-gradation of products<br />
like technology to measure GDP and as a Dallas<br />
Federal Reserve bank report in 1998 put it that<br />
GDP was a measure suitable for measuring<br />
mass production and falls short of measuring<br />
intangible products such as income through<br />
goodwill or patent benefits or innovation for<br />
NOVEMBER 2014