07.12.2014 Views

Diesel

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

18<br />

NIVESHAK<br />

GDP’s origins, relevance<br />

FinGyaan<br />

FinGyaan<br />

& alternatives in<br />

today’s world<br />

Has GDP as a criterion to measure economy’s<br />

progress reached the end of its utility? Today<br />

GDP has become the most important measure<br />

of progress in macroeconomics and almost<br />

every country’s economic policies are designed<br />

keeping in mind the GDP targets. Even the debt,<br />

expenditure, tax collection etc. are measured as a<br />

percentage of GDP. The criticism of GDP started in<br />

1970s due to stagflation in advanced economies<br />

and modern problems like increased commuting<br />

time or lower happiness levels which are not<br />

factored in measuring growth. It is criticized for<br />

multiple reasons: one that it doesn’t measure<br />

the value created by economic activity but<br />

measures only the economic output and second<br />

that it doesn’t take into account non-monetary<br />

costs like pollution, economic inequality or<br />

work life balance. There are also critics of GDP<br />

like economists Michael Green who have also<br />

Ashay S Dalvi<br />

K.J Somaiya Institute of Management Studies<br />

proposed alternative methods to measure<br />

progress. His organisation created the Social<br />

Progress Index for non-economic indicators like<br />

medical care and higher education. The present<br />

day universal standard definition of GDP has<br />

certain assumptions about what to be counted<br />

and what not as an economic activity which<br />

has market price. Although in mass production<br />

economy the amount of goods produced such<br />

as steel, cars, machinery etc. can be measured<br />

but in today’s advanced economy there are<br />

very complicated adjustments made to take<br />

into account quality up-gradation of products<br />

like technology to measure GDP and as a Dallas<br />

Federal Reserve bank report in 1998 put it that<br />

GDP was a measure suitable for measuring<br />

mass production and falls short of measuring<br />

intangible products such as income through<br />

goodwill or patent benefits or innovation for<br />

NOVEMBER 2014

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!