07.12.2014 Views

Diesel

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NIVESHAK 21<br />

one which is more significant. Robert Kennedy<br />

also is critical to the negative effects of GDP<br />

like producing arms and ammunition leading to<br />

increase in the GDP. Also in 2009, former French<br />

president Nicholas Sarkozy, while addressing<br />

French national statistics agency requested that<br />

the agency give greater consideration to factors<br />

such as quality of life and the environment.<br />

The recent criticism of GDP is mostly<br />

due to the fact that the effects of the industrial<br />

revolution are fading after 200 years in<br />

advanced economies. The Asian tiger economies<br />

post decolonization is also experiencing this<br />

phenomenon. However the emerging nations<br />

especially BRICS have yet to realize the fruits<br />

of a developed economy and hence place more<br />

importance on economic output rather than<br />

on wellbeing. Whether GDP is an appropriate<br />

measure can only the decided on per capita<br />

income levels and purchasing power parity (PPP)<br />

of the economy. However if different nations<br />

try and use different statistics for measuring<br />

growth, it might be difficult to comparatively<br />

analyse the global scenario which would create<br />

confusion.<br />

The solution to this is the inclusion of aspects<br />

from Kuznets theory to present day GDP so as to<br />

measure the wellbeing of people such as gains<br />

to well-being stemming from innovation, new<br />

medicines, and better smartphones which helps<br />

increase standard of living of people.<br />

Modifications and improvements in GDP<br />

measurement:<br />

The debate whether income inequality and<br />

government spending on arms and ammunition<br />

should be incorporated in GDP has been there<br />

for a long time even after World War II after<br />

which the people felt the government spending<br />

on weapons as a wasteful expenditure. There<br />

have been attempts made to factor in economic<br />

inequality and environmental damage inside<br />

GDP measurement. In research paper published<br />

in LSE Growth Commission by Nicholas Oulton,<br />

attempts have been made to factor in economic<br />

inequality by Atkinson’s index of inequality<br />

(1970)<br />

E: Parameter measuring “inequality aversion” if<br />

E=0 then society cares nothing for inequality<br />

To factor in economic welfare the paper suggests<br />

concept of Weitzman’s Net National Product<br />

(Weitzman, 1976 and 2003). It is defined as<br />

consumption plus net investment. It’s given by<br />

Where C: Volume of Consumption<br />

Pi: Price of the ith investment good<br />

Pc: Price of consumption<br />

I: Gross investment<br />

D: Depreciation<br />

Such measures are considered by leading<br />

policy makers as important as they not only<br />

factor in important things in the economy apart<br />

from economic output but also are worldwide<br />

accepted. But difficulties in tinkering with the<br />

present framework of GDP makes it difficult<br />

to incorporate these measures. Also some<br />

other economic indicators like HDI (Human<br />

Development Index), Gini coefficient for<br />

measuring economic inequality gives a fair idea<br />

about the overall economic progress and its<br />

sustainability. But certainly an all-encompassing<br />

criteria to measure growth needs to be created.<br />

Article Cover FinGyaan of the Story Month<br />

where<br />

yi: Income of the ith person (or household)<br />

© FINANCE CLUB, INDIAN INSTITUTE Of MANAGEMENT SHILLONG

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!