You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
NIVESHAK 21<br />
one which is more significant. Robert Kennedy<br />
also is critical to the negative effects of GDP<br />
like producing arms and ammunition leading to<br />
increase in the GDP. Also in 2009, former French<br />
president Nicholas Sarkozy, while addressing<br />
French national statistics agency requested that<br />
the agency give greater consideration to factors<br />
such as quality of life and the environment.<br />
The recent criticism of GDP is mostly<br />
due to the fact that the effects of the industrial<br />
revolution are fading after 200 years in<br />
advanced economies. The Asian tiger economies<br />
post decolonization is also experiencing this<br />
phenomenon. However the emerging nations<br />
especially BRICS have yet to realize the fruits<br />
of a developed economy and hence place more<br />
importance on economic output rather than<br />
on wellbeing. Whether GDP is an appropriate<br />
measure can only the decided on per capita<br />
income levels and purchasing power parity (PPP)<br />
of the economy. However if different nations<br />
try and use different statistics for measuring<br />
growth, it might be difficult to comparatively<br />
analyse the global scenario which would create<br />
confusion.<br />
The solution to this is the inclusion of aspects<br />
from Kuznets theory to present day GDP so as to<br />
measure the wellbeing of people such as gains<br />
to well-being stemming from innovation, new<br />
medicines, and better smartphones which helps<br />
increase standard of living of people.<br />
Modifications and improvements in GDP<br />
measurement:<br />
The debate whether income inequality and<br />
government spending on arms and ammunition<br />
should be incorporated in GDP has been there<br />
for a long time even after World War II after<br />
which the people felt the government spending<br />
on weapons as a wasteful expenditure. There<br />
have been attempts made to factor in economic<br />
inequality and environmental damage inside<br />
GDP measurement. In research paper published<br />
in LSE Growth Commission by Nicholas Oulton,<br />
attempts have been made to factor in economic<br />
inequality by Atkinson’s index of inequality<br />
(1970)<br />
E: Parameter measuring “inequality aversion” if<br />
E=0 then society cares nothing for inequality<br />
To factor in economic welfare the paper suggests<br />
concept of Weitzman’s Net National Product<br />
(Weitzman, 1976 and 2003). It is defined as<br />
consumption plus net investment. It’s given by<br />
Where C: Volume of Consumption<br />
Pi: Price of the ith investment good<br />
Pc: Price of consumption<br />
I: Gross investment<br />
D: Depreciation<br />
Such measures are considered by leading<br />
policy makers as important as they not only<br />
factor in important things in the economy apart<br />
from economic output but also are worldwide<br />
accepted. But difficulties in tinkering with the<br />
present framework of GDP makes it difficult<br />
to incorporate these measures. Also some<br />
other economic indicators like HDI (Human<br />
Development Index), Gini coefficient for<br />
measuring economic inequality gives a fair idea<br />
about the overall economic progress and its<br />
sustainability. But certainly an all-encompassing<br />
criteria to measure growth needs to be created.<br />
Article Cover FinGyaan of the Story Month<br />
where<br />
yi: Income of the ith person (or household)<br />
© FINANCE CLUB, INDIAN INSTITUTE Of MANAGEMENT SHILLONG