24.12.2014 Views

DR JOHN MORGAN

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RETENTION<br />

PHOTO: WWW.SHUTTERSTOCK.COM/PETER BERNIK<br />

Figure 1.<br />

Proportion of members reporting the frequency of fitness<br />

staff interaction, overall and by gender<br />

100%<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

19.2<br />

22.9<br />

37.0<br />

21.0<br />

12.7<br />

16.2<br />

38.0<br />

33.0<br />

16.4<br />

20.0<br />

37.4<br />

26.2<br />

Female Male All<br />

16-24 25-34 35-44 45+<br />

Always<br />

Frequently<br />

Occasionally<br />

Never<br />

Figure 2.<br />

Proportion of members reporting the frequency of fitness<br />

staff interaction by age group<br />

100%<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

15.0<br />

17.3<br />

36.8<br />

30.9<br />

12.6<br />

20.3<br />

38.9<br />

28.2<br />

16.1<br />

19.7<br />

37.2<br />

27.1<br />

20.0<br />

20.8<br />

36.7<br />

22.5<br />

Always<br />

Frequently<br />

Occasionally<br />

Never<br />

“For members who<br />

report either high or<br />

low progress, the risk<br />

of cancelling reduces<br />

with the frequency<br />

<br />

communication”<br />

The chances of being spoken to at<br />

least frequently increase with age, with<br />

two-thirds of members aged 16 to 24<br />

saying fi tness staff only speak to them<br />

occasionally or never (Figure 2).<br />

Long-standing members experience<br />

greater fi tness staff communication<br />

compared to new members, with 50<br />

per cent more of the longest standing<br />

members reporting at least frequent<br />

communication compared to new<br />

members (Figure 3).<br />

The Retention People (TRP) has<br />

shown many times that younger<br />

members and new members are<br />

at greater risk of cancelling their<br />

memberships compared to older,<br />

long-standing members. It’s therefore<br />

the most at-risk members – the<br />

people who would benefi t most from<br />

fi tness staff interactions – who are<br />

least likely to receive them.<br />

Interaction, progress<br />

and retention<br />

Meanwhile, Figure 4 shows there’s a<br />

very strong association between<br />

members’ recent progress towards<br />

their goals and the frequency of fitness<br />

staff interactions: fewer than one in<br />

10 members who report no fitness<br />

staff interaction say they have made a<br />

lot of progress in the last three<br />

months, compared to more than half<br />

of members who are spoken to by<br />

fitness staff each time they visit.<br />

Interestingly, the relationship between<br />

staff interaction and member progress<br />

is strongest for social and enjoyment<br />

progress. Members who report frequent<br />

interactions with fi tness staff are also<br />

much more likely to report they have<br />

made a new friend at the club and to say<br />

they have enjoyed exercising in the last<br />

three months (data not shown).<br />

So does recent progress and fi tness<br />

staff interaction also affect risk of<br />

Both younger and newer<br />

members are among the<br />

most at risk of cancelling<br />

56<br />

Read Health Club Management online at healthclubmanagement.co.uk/digital<br />

November/December 2014 © Cybertrek 2014

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!