27.12.2014 Views

Assessing e Values and Management of the NSW Travelling ... - Land

Assessing e Values and Management of the NSW Travelling ... - Land

Assessing e Values and Management of the NSW Travelling ... - Land

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ASSESSING THE VALUES AND MANAGEMENT OF THE <strong>NSW</strong> TRAVELLING STOCK RESERVE<br />

purpose maintained. Any reserves with high conservation values, i.e. rated NC1 or NC2,<br />

was reserved for Environmental Protection. Multiple use <strong>of</strong> Crown l<strong>and</strong> was encouraged.<br />

The LPMA (L<strong>and</strong>s) intends to retain all l<strong>and</strong>s under <strong>the</strong> Crown estate but <strong>the</strong>ir management<br />

may vary through <strong>the</strong> interests <strong>of</strong> relevant agencies (e.g. DECCW), Local Government<br />

Councils, <strong>and</strong> community groups, including Aboriginal L<strong>and</strong> Councils. These interested<br />

parties may become trustees under <strong>the</strong> Crown L<strong>and</strong>s Act to manage specific reserves<br />

where a clear case can be established that this is <strong>the</strong> most desired <strong>and</strong> practical outcome.<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r allocation option available to LPMA (L<strong>and</strong>s) is disposal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parcel. This is seen<br />

as an option only where it meets <strong>the</strong> following criteria:<br />

• High socio-economic values (potential development); <strong>and</strong><br />

• Small in area, i.e. < 4ha; <strong>and</strong><br />

• Poor stock route <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scape connectivity; <strong>and</strong><br />

• No significant environmental, cultural/social values; <strong>and</strong><br />

• Sale price to reflect best use<br />

A decision making flowchart has been developed to show <strong>the</strong> allocation process (see<br />

Figure 4).<br />

*NOTE: For TSRs ceded back to LPMA (L<strong>and</strong>s), <strong>the</strong>re is a prime responsibility that future<br />

management options be considered initially, in accordance with <strong>the</strong> principles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Crown<br />

L<strong>and</strong>s Act 1989. Essentially, <strong>the</strong>se are triple-bottom-line principles, <strong>of</strong> environmental values,<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> social <strong>and</strong> economic needs <strong>of</strong> a community with growing needs. Often, two <strong>and</strong><br />

sometimes all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se principles may produce an interrelated <strong>and</strong> multi-use outcome which<br />

is encouraged by <strong>the</strong> enabling legislation <strong>and</strong> policies <strong>of</strong> LPMA (L<strong>and</strong>s).<br />

It is <strong>the</strong>refore appropriate that in accordance with stated Ministerial policy all TSRs ceded<br />

back to management by LPMA (L<strong>and</strong>s) will continue to be retained as travelling stock<br />

reserves, <strong>and</strong> managed within <strong>the</strong> Crown l<strong>and</strong> estate as part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state wide Crown<br />

Reserve Corridors Program. Additional reservation purposes will be encouraged to reflect<br />

multifunctional use including for conservation purposes where <strong>the</strong>se values are considered<br />

significant.<br />

Variations:<br />

TSRs which on assessment are found to warrant management within <strong>the</strong> Crown l<strong>and</strong>s<br />

estate via a Trustee arrangement, may be considered for allocation under <strong>the</strong> care, control<br />

<strong>and</strong> management <strong>of</strong> such a trustee within a Plan <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> approved by <strong>the</strong> Minister<br />

for L<strong>and</strong>s. For instance, where environmental reservation values are known to be high <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> TSR is adjacent to <strong>the</strong> National Park estate <strong>the</strong>n consideration can be given to <strong>the</strong><br />

management <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> TSR by DECCW as Trustee.<br />

Alternatively, where <strong>the</strong>re are strong regional growth potential <strong>and</strong> needs, <strong>the</strong> spatial<br />

interface between some TSRs <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> built environment becomes critical in determining<br />

preferred use. In <strong>the</strong>se circumstances, where <strong>the</strong> assessment process clearly indicates no<br />

sound reasons for retention as public l<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> where <strong>the</strong>se social <strong>and</strong> economic <strong>and</strong> social<br />

needs are well articulated by local communities, disposal through sale may be an<br />

appropriate outcome for a restricted number <strong>and</strong> area <strong>of</strong> TSRs (e.g. within <strong>and</strong> adjoining<br />

towns). General criteria for disposal are provided in <strong>the</strong> following diagram. Examples <strong>of</strong><br />

where disposal has appropriately occurred in <strong>the</strong> past, <strong>and</strong> which are likely to occur into <strong>the</strong><br />

REPORT ON METHODOLOGY AND FINDINGS AUGUST 2009 Page 30 <strong>of</strong> 88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!