27.12.2014 Views

Assessing e Values and Management of the NSW Travelling ... - Land

Assessing e Values and Management of the NSW Travelling ... - Land

Assessing e Values and Management of the NSW Travelling ... - Land

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ASSESSING THE VALUES AND MANAGEMENT OF THE <strong>NSW</strong> TRAVELLING STOCK RESERVE<br />

REPORT ON METHODOLOGY AND FINDINGS AUGUST 2009 Page 78 <strong>of</strong> 88<br />

Communication <strong>and</strong> consultation planning DRAFT v.1a<br />

Project title: <strong>Assessing</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Values</strong> & <strong>Management</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Travelling</strong> Stock Reserve Network<br />

for biodiversity enhancement & optimal management in <strong>the</strong> Hunter Valley<br />

Description<br />

<strong>of</strong> project:<br />

Project<br />

manager:<br />

Funding<br />

source<br />

• Pilot project assessment methodology to be strategically <strong>and</strong> consistently rolled out state-wide.<br />

• Assess <strong>the</strong> values <strong>of</strong> approx. 3,282ha <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> TSR network to identify potential use options for <strong>the</strong> future.<br />

• Identifying areas with high priority ecosystems within &/or adjacent to TSR’s for biodiversity conservation, <strong>and</strong> develop<br />

options & recommendations for future management, consistent with <strong>the</strong> H-CR CMA CAP & Legislation.<br />

• Protect <strong>and</strong> enhance 75ha <strong>of</strong> native vegetation. Identify significant vegetation & EEC’s on existing TSR’s.<br />

Mark Grace<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> L<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> Catchment<br />

Action<br />

Funding<br />

amount<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

staff<br />

involved<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> plan Communication<br />

(one way communication)<br />

Planning Ideas Brochures, websites, presentations,<br />

media etc<br />

Issues<br />

identification:<br />

Adrian Harte – Director L<strong>and</strong> <strong>Management</strong>; Project Officer(s) Dept<br />

<strong>of</strong> L<strong>and</strong>s; STAKEHOLDER REFERENCE GROUP in Consultation with<br />

<strong>the</strong> TECHNICAL REFERENCE GROUP.<br />

$260 000 Amount allocated for<br />

communications<br />

Consultation<br />

(two-way including feedback)<br />

Facilitated workshops, public exhibition<br />

process, attending group meetings etc<br />

Appendix G. Communication <strong>and</strong> Consultation Strategy<br />

Up to $5000 plus L<strong>and</strong>s - in<br />

kind support<br />

Education<br />

(awareness raising through activity)<br />

Area Maitl<strong>and</strong> Board Area 406 ha.<br />

Hunter Board Area 2,876 ha.<br />

Report on 3,282 ha <strong>of</strong> TSR’s.<br />

Protect & enhance 75ha <strong>of</strong><br />

Native Vegetation.<br />

Project<br />

duration Until June 2009<br />

Job<br />

number<br />

Stakeholder education program, training<br />

days, field days etc<br />

99000567<br />

Marketing/promotions<br />

(Media Releases, Information docs.)<br />

Flyers, signs, banners, displays,<br />

promotional products etc<br />

• Identification <strong>of</strong> all TSR’s within <strong>the</strong> project area, including <strong>the</strong>ir current uses, existing assets & Aboriginal/European cultural significance.<br />

• Identify existing agreements between RLPB’s & current TSR users for those TSR’s identified to be <strong>of</strong> high conservation or linkage significance.<br />

• Identify which TSR’s have an obvious future use, to concentrate resources on TSR’s with less obvious future use/management.<br />

• Inaccurate information & mistrust about <strong>the</strong> <strong>NSW</strong> Govt’s future plans for existing TSR’s, partly through incomplete reporting in mass media.<br />

• RLPB rationalisation from 47 down to 13 new RLPB districts state-wide, & what this will mean for grazier stakeholders.<br />

• O<strong>the</strong>rs to be identified when stakeholder survey results are received & interpreted by <strong>the</strong> project manager.<br />

Objectives: • To develop a stakeholder database & gain accurate input into <strong>the</strong> project, implement data ga<strong>the</strong>ring consultation measures.<br />

• To provide information to licence holders & key stakeholders about <strong>the</strong> various end uses for <strong>the</strong> TSR’s & why <strong>the</strong>y’re appropriate.<br />

• To respond to issues <strong>and</strong> concerns raised by licence holders <strong>and</strong> stakeholders & to assist <strong>the</strong>m to make a formal submission.<br />

• Maximise use <strong>of</strong> desk top assessment tools asap, to identify areas that may require fur<strong>the</strong>r investigation early in <strong>the</strong> process.<br />

• Provide <strong>the</strong> opportunity for <strong>the</strong> community to have active input into determining <strong>the</strong> values <strong>and</strong> constraints involved in TSR <strong>Management</strong>.<br />

• Obtain local knowledge from former RLPB Staff about all aspects <strong>of</strong> TSR’s; Cultural heritage, usefulness for stock, o<strong>the</strong>r uses/issues.<br />

• To ensure that all recommendations & publications are consistent with <strong>the</strong> Project Plan, <strong>and</strong> relevant policy <strong>and</strong> legislation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!