Assessing e Values and Management of the NSW Travelling ... - Land
Assessing e Values and Management of the NSW Travelling ... - Land
Assessing e Values and Management of the NSW Travelling ... - Land
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ASSESSING THE VALUES AND MANAGEMENT OF THE <strong>NSW</strong> TRAVELLING STOCK RESERVE<br />
REPORT ON METHODOLOGY AND FINDINGS AUGUST 2009 Page 78 <strong>of</strong> 88<br />
Communication <strong>and</strong> consultation planning DRAFT v.1a<br />
Project title: <strong>Assessing</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Values</strong> & <strong>Management</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Travelling</strong> Stock Reserve Network<br />
for biodiversity enhancement & optimal management in <strong>the</strong> Hunter Valley<br />
Description<br />
<strong>of</strong> project:<br />
Project<br />
manager:<br />
Funding<br />
source<br />
• Pilot project assessment methodology to be strategically <strong>and</strong> consistently rolled out state-wide.<br />
• Assess <strong>the</strong> values <strong>of</strong> approx. 3,282ha <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> TSR network to identify potential use options for <strong>the</strong> future.<br />
• Identifying areas with high priority ecosystems within &/or adjacent to TSR’s for biodiversity conservation, <strong>and</strong> develop<br />
options & recommendations for future management, consistent with <strong>the</strong> H-CR CMA CAP & Legislation.<br />
• Protect <strong>and</strong> enhance 75ha <strong>of</strong> native vegetation. Identify significant vegetation & EEC’s on existing TSR’s.<br />
Mark Grace<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> L<strong>and</strong>s.<br />
<strong>NSW</strong> Catchment<br />
Action<br />
Funding<br />
amount<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
staff<br />
involved<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> plan Communication<br />
(one way communication)<br />
Planning Ideas Brochures, websites, presentations,<br />
media etc<br />
Issues<br />
identification:<br />
Adrian Harte – Director L<strong>and</strong> <strong>Management</strong>; Project Officer(s) Dept<br />
<strong>of</strong> L<strong>and</strong>s; STAKEHOLDER REFERENCE GROUP in Consultation with<br />
<strong>the</strong> TECHNICAL REFERENCE GROUP.<br />
$260 000 Amount allocated for<br />
communications<br />
Consultation<br />
(two-way including feedback)<br />
Facilitated workshops, public exhibition<br />
process, attending group meetings etc<br />
Appendix G. Communication <strong>and</strong> Consultation Strategy<br />
Up to $5000 plus L<strong>and</strong>s - in<br />
kind support<br />
Education<br />
(awareness raising through activity)<br />
Area Maitl<strong>and</strong> Board Area 406 ha.<br />
Hunter Board Area 2,876 ha.<br />
Report on 3,282 ha <strong>of</strong> TSR’s.<br />
Protect & enhance 75ha <strong>of</strong><br />
Native Vegetation.<br />
Project<br />
duration Until June 2009<br />
Job<br />
number<br />
Stakeholder education program, training<br />
days, field days etc<br />
99000567<br />
Marketing/promotions<br />
(Media Releases, Information docs.)<br />
Flyers, signs, banners, displays,<br />
promotional products etc<br />
• Identification <strong>of</strong> all TSR’s within <strong>the</strong> project area, including <strong>the</strong>ir current uses, existing assets & Aboriginal/European cultural significance.<br />
• Identify existing agreements between RLPB’s & current TSR users for those TSR’s identified to be <strong>of</strong> high conservation or linkage significance.<br />
• Identify which TSR’s have an obvious future use, to concentrate resources on TSR’s with less obvious future use/management.<br />
• Inaccurate information & mistrust about <strong>the</strong> <strong>NSW</strong> Govt’s future plans for existing TSR’s, partly through incomplete reporting in mass media.<br />
• RLPB rationalisation from 47 down to 13 new RLPB districts state-wide, & what this will mean for grazier stakeholders.<br />
• O<strong>the</strong>rs to be identified when stakeholder survey results are received & interpreted by <strong>the</strong> project manager.<br />
Objectives: • To develop a stakeholder database & gain accurate input into <strong>the</strong> project, implement data ga<strong>the</strong>ring consultation measures.<br />
• To provide information to licence holders & key stakeholders about <strong>the</strong> various end uses for <strong>the</strong> TSR’s & why <strong>the</strong>y’re appropriate.<br />
• To respond to issues <strong>and</strong> concerns raised by licence holders <strong>and</strong> stakeholders & to assist <strong>the</strong>m to make a formal submission.<br />
• Maximise use <strong>of</strong> desk top assessment tools asap, to identify areas that may require fur<strong>the</strong>r investigation early in <strong>the</strong> process.<br />
• Provide <strong>the</strong> opportunity for <strong>the</strong> community to have active input into determining <strong>the</strong> values <strong>and</strong> constraints involved in TSR <strong>Management</strong>.<br />
• Obtain local knowledge from former RLPB Staff about all aspects <strong>of</strong> TSR’s; Cultural heritage, usefulness for stock, o<strong>the</strong>r uses/issues.<br />
• To ensure that all recommendations & publications are consistent with <strong>the</strong> Project Plan, <strong>and</strong> relevant policy <strong>and</strong> legislation.