Assessing e Values and Management of the NSW Travelling ... - Land
Assessing e Values and Management of the NSW Travelling ... - Land
Assessing e Values and Management of the NSW Travelling ... - Land
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ASSESSING THE VALUES AND MANAGEMENT OF THE <strong>NSW</strong> TRAVELLING STOCK RESERVE<br />
3.12 Central West Trial<br />
The methodology <strong>and</strong> CLASS support tool was successfully trialled on 24 TSRs<br />
totalling 1000ha located in <strong>the</strong> former Molong <strong>and</strong> Forbes RLPBs. A summary <strong>of</strong><br />
results is provided in Appendix E. The Central West trial was also involved in a<br />
DECCW project identifying potential sites for Aboriginal community engagement in<br />
<strong>the</strong> management <strong>of</strong> TSRs. The methodology <strong>and</strong> results from <strong>the</strong> trial will assist <strong>the</strong><br />
LPMA to assess Aboriginal Cultural Heritage, engage <strong>the</strong> community <strong>and</strong> progress<br />
co-management arrangements. The LPMA will continue to work with DECCW<br />
Culture <strong>and</strong> Heritage Branch to develop appropriate assessment <strong>and</strong> management<br />
processes.<br />
3.13 Communication <strong>and</strong> Consultation Strategy<br />
A strategy was developed by <strong>the</strong> HCRCMA <strong>and</strong> endorsed by <strong>the</strong> Stakeholder<br />
Reference Group (see Appendix G). Communication/consultation issues identified in<br />
<strong>the</strong> strategy were:<br />
• Identification <strong>of</strong> all TSR’s within <strong>the</strong> project area, including <strong>the</strong>ir current uses,<br />
existing assets & Aboriginal/European cultural significance.<br />
• Identify existing agreements between RLPB’s & current TSR users for those<br />
TSR’s identified to be <strong>of</strong> high conservation or linkage significance.<br />
• Identify which TSR’s have an obvious future use, to concentrate resources on<br />
TSR’s with less obvious future use/management.<br />
• Inaccurate information & mistrust about <strong>the</strong> <strong>NSW</strong> Govt’s future plans for<br />
existing TSR’s, partly through incomplete reporting in mass media.<br />
• RLPB rationalisation from 47 down to 13 new RLPB districts state-wide, &<br />
what this will mean for grazier stakeholders.<br />
• O<strong>the</strong>rs to be identified when stakeholder survey results are received &<br />
interpreted by <strong>the</strong> project manager.<br />
The actions undertaken to address <strong>the</strong> communication issues included:<br />
• Collating a list <strong>of</strong> key stakeholders – including contact details<br />
• Regular media releases in local newspapers alerting <strong>the</strong> community to <strong>the</strong><br />
project <strong>and</strong> updating on progress<br />
• Hosting information on LPMA (L<strong>and</strong>s) website, such as Q & A’s <strong>and</strong> fact<br />
sheets, dealing with TSRs generally <strong>and</strong> also making reference to <strong>the</strong> Pilot<br />
Project<br />
• Holding regular meetings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Stakeholder Reference Group<br />
• Holding a field trip to <strong>the</strong> Upper Hunter for Stakeholder Reference Group<br />
representatives<br />
• Making presentations to specific stakeholders, including <strong>the</strong> Aboriginal<br />
Cultural <strong>and</strong> Environmental Network <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> TSR Future Unlimited group,<br />
outlining <strong>the</strong> objectives <strong>and</strong> methodology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pilot Project <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
implications <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> TSR h<strong>and</strong>-back<br />
• Distributing <strong>the</strong> assessment <strong>and</strong> decision making methodology to <strong>the</strong><br />
Stakeholder Reference Group representatives for comment<br />
REPORT ON METHODOLOGY AND FINDINGS AUGUST 2009 Page 48 <strong>of</strong> 88