27.12.2014 Views

Annual Report 2012 - singapore land limited

Annual Report 2012 - singapore land limited

Annual Report 2012 - singapore land limited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

18<br />

Singapore Land Limited - <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT<br />

INTERESTED PERSON TRANSACTIONS POLICIES<br />

The Company has adopted an internal policy in respect of any transaction with interested persons and has set out the<br />

procedures for review and approval of the Company’s interested person transaction.<br />

The Company’s disclosures according to Rule 907 of the SGX-ST Listing Manual in respect of interested person<br />

transactions (“IPT”) for the fi nancial year ended 31 December <strong>2012</strong> are set out as follows:<br />

Name of Interested Person<br />

Aggregate value of all IPT during<br />

the financial year under review<br />

(excluding transactions less<br />

than $100,000 and transactions<br />

conducted under shareholders’<br />

mandate pursuant to Rule 920 of<br />

the SGX-ST Listing Manual)<br />

S$’million<br />

Aggregate value of all IPT<br />

conducted under shareholders’<br />

mandate pursuant to Rule 920 of the<br />

SGX-ST Listing Manual (excluding<br />

transactions less than $100,000)<br />

S$’million<br />

United Industrial Corporation Limited<br />

Rental and service income from United<br />

Industrial Corporation Limited<br />

1.3 n/a<br />

UOL Venture Investments Pte. Ltd.<br />

Contribution of shareholder’s loan in United<br />

Venture Development (Bedok) Pte. Ltd. for the<br />

development of Archipelago<br />

21.1 n/a<br />

UOL Venture Investments Pte. Ltd.<br />

Contribution of shareholder’s loan and equity<br />

in UVD Pte. Ltd. for the development of<br />

residential site at Bright Hill Drive<br />

58.5 n/a<br />

The above IPT were conducted on normal commercial terms. The AC was also of the view that the risks and rewards of<br />

the aforementioned joint ventures were in proportion to the equity of each joint venture partner, and that the joint ventures<br />

were not prejudicial to the interests of the Company and its minority shareholders.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!