Annual Report 2012 - singapore land limited
Annual Report 2012 - singapore land limited
Annual Report 2012 - singapore land limited
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
18<br />
Singapore Land Limited - <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT<br />
INTERESTED PERSON TRANSACTIONS POLICIES<br />
The Company has adopted an internal policy in respect of any transaction with interested persons and has set out the<br />
procedures for review and approval of the Company’s interested person transaction.<br />
The Company’s disclosures according to Rule 907 of the SGX-ST Listing Manual in respect of interested person<br />
transactions (“IPT”) for the fi nancial year ended 31 December <strong>2012</strong> are set out as follows:<br />
Name of Interested Person<br />
Aggregate value of all IPT during<br />
the financial year under review<br />
(excluding transactions less<br />
than $100,000 and transactions<br />
conducted under shareholders’<br />
mandate pursuant to Rule 920 of<br />
the SGX-ST Listing Manual)<br />
S$’million<br />
Aggregate value of all IPT<br />
conducted under shareholders’<br />
mandate pursuant to Rule 920 of the<br />
SGX-ST Listing Manual (excluding<br />
transactions less than $100,000)<br />
S$’million<br />
United Industrial Corporation Limited<br />
Rental and service income from United<br />
Industrial Corporation Limited<br />
1.3 n/a<br />
UOL Venture Investments Pte. Ltd.<br />
Contribution of shareholder’s loan in United<br />
Venture Development (Bedok) Pte. Ltd. for the<br />
development of Archipelago<br />
21.1 n/a<br />
UOL Venture Investments Pte. Ltd.<br />
Contribution of shareholder’s loan and equity<br />
in UVD Pte. Ltd. for the development of<br />
residential site at Bright Hill Drive<br />
58.5 n/a<br />
The above IPT were conducted on normal commercial terms. The AC was also of the view that the risks and rewards of<br />
the aforementioned joint ventures were in proportion to the equity of each joint venture partner, and that the joint ventures<br />
were not prejudicial to the interests of the Company and its minority shareholders.