30.12.2014 Views

2.1: Anthropometric Indicators Measurement Guide - Linkages Project

2.1: Anthropometric Indicators Measurement Guide - Linkages Project

2.1: Anthropometric Indicators Measurement Guide - Linkages Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

P ART<br />

1.Introduction<br />

1.<br />

This guide provides information on the <strong>Anthropometric</strong> Impact<br />

<strong>Indicators</strong> and the Annual Monitoring <strong>Indicators</strong> for Maternal and<br />

Child Health/Child Survival (MCH/CS) and income-related Title II<br />

activities, a subset of the P.L. 480 Title II Generic Performance <strong>Indicators</strong> for<br />

Development Activities. The impact indicators are:<br />

• decreased percent of stunted children (presented for ages 24-60<br />

months and by gender), where stunting is defined as percent of children<br />

falling below -2 standard deviations for height-for-age;<br />

• decreased percent of underweight children (in specified age<br />

groupings such as 12-24 months 36-59 months and by gender) where<br />

underweight is defined as percent of children falling below -2 standard<br />

deviations for weight-for-age.<br />

These indicators are required for the reports of projects with specific<br />

nutrition components and are collected at baseline, mid-term and final-year<br />

evaluations. Stunting, reflected by deficits in height-for-age would not be<br />

expected to change in a short time period. It is recommended, therefore, not<br />

to report stunting figures annually. Underweight (or weight for age), reported<br />

for specific age groupings, would change more quickly as it is influenced by<br />

short-term effects such as a recent outbreak of diarrheal diseases.<br />

Some programs report stunting for children under 24 months of age<br />

rather than the recommended 24-60 months age grouping. Restricting the<br />

age grouping to children under 24 months has the disadvantage of not<br />

capturing the lagged effects of the program and reducing the numbers of<br />

potential participants in a survey. The advantage of using children under 24<br />

months is that the data are more useful to determine the factors related to<br />

stunting for program design or redesign.<br />

The monitoring indicators are:<br />

• increased percent of eligible children in growth<br />

monitoring/promotion (usually presented for children

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!