30.12.2014 Views

Biophysical studies of membrane proteins/peptides. Interaction with ...

Biophysical studies of membrane proteins/peptides. Interaction with ...

Biophysical studies of membrane proteins/peptides. Interaction with ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter III ‐ Binding <strong>of</strong> Inhibitors to a Putative Binding<br />

Domain <strong>of</strong> V‐ATPase.<br />

The <strong>studies</strong> conducted allowed us to know in detail the properties <strong>of</strong> the indole type<br />

<strong>of</strong> inhibitors in lipid <strong>membrane</strong>s. The molecules studied, which correspond to the initial<br />

(low efficiency) and final stage (high efficiency) in the development <strong>of</strong> these inhibitors<br />

as potential drugs in osteoporosis treatment, present almost identical properties in the<br />

liposomes environment. The preference <strong>of</strong> the lipid phase over the aqueous phase, the<br />

position in the bilayer and the orientation <strong>of</strong> the molecules were all almost identical for<br />

both molecules studied.<br />

According to the results <strong>of</strong> Gagliardi et al. (1998a), the change in inhibition<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> the V-ATPase inhibitors <strong>with</strong>in the indole class presented some extent <strong>of</strong><br />

correlation to the hydrophobicity <strong>of</strong> the molecules, i.e. the more hydrophobic indole<br />

inhibitor molecules had also a tendency to be more efficient inhibitors <strong>of</strong> V-ATPase. It<br />

was possible that the interaction <strong>of</strong> the molecules <strong>with</strong> the lipid milieu was significantly<br />

different <strong>with</strong>in this class <strong>of</strong> inhibitors, and this could correspond to dramatically<br />

different efficiencies <strong>of</strong> inhibition, explaining the 10 3 difference in IC 50 values <strong>of</strong> INH-1<br />

and SB242784. In this way, the process <strong>of</strong> inhibitor binding to the lipid bilayer would<br />

be crucial to the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the inhibition event. However, the results obtained point<br />

to a non-determinant role <strong>of</strong> inhibitor interaction <strong>with</strong> the lipid bilayer, and the specific<br />

molecular recognition processes <strong>with</strong> the enzyme’s inhibition site are very likely to be<br />

responsible for dictating the large differences <strong>of</strong> inhibition efficiencies <strong>with</strong>in the V-<br />

ATPase indole inhibitors class.<br />

The binding <strong>studies</strong> <strong>of</strong> bafilomycin and SB242784 to the peptide corresponding to<br />

the 4 th TM helix <strong>of</strong> subunit c <strong>of</strong> V-ATPase revealed no affinity at all for SB242784 and<br />

very low affinities for bafilomycin. These results can be seen as an indicator that the<br />

binding pocket for the inhibitors is not solely composed <strong>of</strong> the lipid exposed face <strong>of</strong> the<br />

4 th TM helix <strong>of</strong> subunit c, but also involves contributions <strong>of</strong> amino acids from other<br />

domains <strong>of</strong> the protein. This proposal is in agreement <strong>with</strong> the hypothesis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

inhibitors operating as a stone in a gear, blocking movements <strong>of</strong> the TM domains <strong>of</strong><br />

subunit c and interrupting proton transport.<br />

184

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!