01.01.2015 Views

download the pdf - St.Francis Magazine

download the pdf - St.Francis Magazine

download the pdf - St.Francis Magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>St</strong> <strong>Francis</strong> <strong>Magazine</strong> Vol 8, No 4 | August 2012<br />

reach Muslims. For ano<strong>the</strong>r, later, response to Parshall (1998b), see<br />

also Winter (2009).<br />

<strong>St</strong>ill in this same issue of EMQ, Gilliland (1998: 415) took issue<br />

with “a tone of defensiveness” he sensed in Parshall’s comments,<br />

even while conceding some of Parshall’s concerns as being justified.<br />

In particular, Gilliland questioned Parshall’s conclusions drawn<br />

from <strong>the</strong> results of <strong>the</strong> unpublished ‘Islampur’ research, which had<br />

examined <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ological beliefs and priorities held by some<br />

MBBs. 10 Gilliland stressed “<strong>the</strong> critical issue of context” and called<br />

for more time in interpreting C5 ministries, since <strong>the</strong>y were still in<br />

progressive development (Gilliland 1998: 416; similarly Travis<br />

1998b: 412). 11 Travis also took issue with Parshall’s interpretation,<br />

most notably Parshall’s claim that “45 per cent [of MBBs in <strong>the</strong><br />

study] do not affirm God as Fa<strong>the</strong>r, Son and Holy Spirit” forms part<br />

of “<strong>the</strong> down side” of C5 (Parshall 1998b: 406). For Travis (1999:<br />

660) it was “actually astounding” that “over half” affirm <strong>the</strong> Trinity.<br />

12<br />

This particular statistic, drawn from <strong>the</strong> ‘Islampur’ study, subsequently<br />

became a football for both sides of <strong>the</strong> debate. Woods<br />

(2003: 194-195) interpreted <strong>the</strong> 55% figure in a negative light,<br />

whereas Massey (2004c: 297-298) and Brown (2006d: 131) drew<br />

10 Details of <strong>the</strong> ‘Islampur’ study need to be pieced toge<strong>the</strong>r from <strong>the</strong> glimpses<br />

available in different commentaries upon it. Parshall (2003: 69-70) provides<br />

perhaps <strong>the</strong> most comprehensive description of it.<br />

11 Schlorff (2006: 87) identifies Gilliland as <strong>the</strong> “research director” of <strong>the</strong> Islampur<br />

study.<br />

12 Travis (1999) states that it is Travis (1998b), ‘used by permission’ from <strong>the</strong> original<br />

publisher (p.660). However, a close reading of <strong>the</strong> two texts indicates a differing<br />

introduction to <strong>the</strong> section entitled ‘The Islampur case study’, with <strong>the</strong> variation<br />

running for over a paragraph in length (compare Travis 1998b: 411 with<br />

Travis 1999: 660). It is impossible to tell in which order <strong>the</strong> two versions were<br />

written, or <strong>the</strong> rationale for <strong>the</strong> changes, but it is interesting to note <strong>the</strong> varying<br />

versions, especially at this crucial juncture where – in both instances – <strong>the</strong> writing<br />

is in response to Parshall’s criticisms and is concerned with <strong>the</strong> assessment of <strong>the</strong><br />

Islampur study. I have not made wider parallel readings of <strong>the</strong> two versions of<br />

Travis’ article, nor of o<strong>the</strong>r documents claiming to be reproduced from elsewhere<br />

in <strong>the</strong> 1999 volume. Thus, I cannot assess <strong>the</strong> extent to which such revisions occur<br />

elsewhere.<br />

<strong>St</strong> <strong>Francis</strong> <strong>Magazine</strong> is a publication of Interserve and Arab Vision 457

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!