06.01.2015 Views

Strategies for Executive Compensation: Design and Tax Issues for a ...

Strategies for Executive Compensation: Design and Tax Issues for a ...

Strategies for Executive Compensation: Design and Tax Issues for a ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 5 -<br />

U.S., a wide range of incentives are subject to disgorgement in Canada, with a typical<br />

look-back period of two to three years. 6<br />

Clawback provisions have been commonly categorized into the following three major<br />

categories:<br />

(1) the first category covers “bad faith” conduct which includes the breach of<br />

non-compete policies, <strong>and</strong> more generally conduct that is not in good faith<br />

<strong>and</strong> goes against the best interests of the company.<br />

(2) The second major category covers fraud, negligence or intentional<br />

misconduct, where the employee has unearned income as a result of<br />

fraudulent or negligent conduct leading to financial results that need to be<br />

revised at a later point.<br />

(3) The third major categories are clawbacks that are triggered directly by a<br />

restatement of financial results, with no need <strong>for</strong> the company to show a<br />

causal link between the negative revision <strong>and</strong> employee misconduct.<br />

Companies may adopt a combination or all of these measures in their clawback<br />

policies, <strong>and</strong> the following examples will demonstrate that companies may adopt<br />

language that is not clearly caught by these categories. Overall, it seems however, that<br />

the inclusion of strict restatement clawbacks is increasingly common, particularly in<br />

Canadian entities that adopt such provisions.<br />

6 Ibid

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!