08.01.2015 Views

1 Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) – sales, withdrawal ...

1 Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) – sales, withdrawal ...

1 Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) – sales, withdrawal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction<br />

Today it is well documented that benzodiazepines can cause dependence, but for many years it was<br />

only discussed and not widely accepted. It also took some years before it was recognised that<br />

<strong>SSRI</strong>S can cause <strong>withdrawal</strong> reactions but today it is well described. It is well described that<br />

antidepressants and other psychotropic drugs may cause <strong>withdrawal</strong> reactions (1, 2). In 1961,<br />

Hollister, Motzenbecker & Degan (3) documented dependence with benzodiazepines. However,<br />

when benzodiazepines were first launched, the drug companies claimed that they did not have such<br />

effects (4). It is still being discussed whether <strong>SSRI</strong>s can also cause dependence.<br />

Drug agencies play a very important role for reliable information about drugs. They are responsible<br />

for informing about efficacy and adverse effects of drugs, which is a prerequisite for informed<br />

consent when doctors prescribe drugs for patients. Society has an expectation that drug agencies<br />

will offer neutral and comprehensive information, also after marketing authorization is granted.<br />

Pharmacovigilance systems update information about adverse reactions, which may lead to<br />

regulatory action or changes in the information to prescribers and the public (5). Two different<br />

models of drug regulation are described. The first is the precautionary principle model and the<br />

second the risk management principle model (6). The precautionary principle has its focus on safety<br />

and effectiveness and accurate information to the public and prescribers. Even in absence of firm<br />

data about adverse events, signals should lead to delayed market authorization or restrictions. The<br />

risk management principle focuses on facilitating the industry’s possibilities to develop new drugs<br />

and market them quickly. The risk management principle holds that drugs should be assumed safe<br />

unless there is information to the contrary (6). These two paradigms are obviously in conflict, and<br />

the risk management principle has often been criticized. Abraham (7) suggested that drug regulation<br />

is permissive, Lader (8) talked about conservative drug regulation, and McGoye (9) described drug<br />

regulators' 'will to ignorance' in relation to safety issues.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!