10.11.2012 Views

Sport and Colonialism in 19th Century Australasia - LA84 Foundation

Sport and Colonialism in 19th Century Australasia - LA84 Foundation

Sport and Colonialism in 19th Century Australasia - LA84 Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

For the gentry, gambl<strong>in</strong>g was typically a means of display,<br />

<strong>in</strong> which they could show their wealth <strong>and</strong> their contempt for<br />

mere money, rather than a means of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g that wealth. For<br />

them, los<strong>in</strong>g large stakes was just as important as w<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g. They<br />

were not concerned with try<strong>in</strong>g to achieve good odds. An evenmoney<br />

bet had greater attraction than the possibility of w<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a large sum for a small <strong>in</strong>vestment. 16<br />

For the poorer classes however, a w<strong>in</strong> offered the opportunity<br />

to achieve th<strong>in</strong>gs which were normally beyond their means.<br />

The man who won at "throw<strong>in</strong>g at cocks" could assume, for awhile,<br />

the role of entrepreneur. One who won a prize <strong>in</strong> a lottery<br />

could present his sweetheart with a tr<strong>in</strong>ket. For most of the<br />

labour<strong>in</strong>g classes <strong>in</strong>come was irregular <strong>and</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gs were virtually<br />

unheard of, apart from the money put aside for burial expenses.<br />

So for them, gambl<strong>in</strong>g provided a unique opportunity<br />

<strong>and</strong> naturally they were attracted to those forms which offered<br />

the possibility of a large prize <strong>in</strong> return for a small outlay. 17<br />

The history of British lotteries illustrates this difference<br />

<strong>in</strong> attitude. When Engl<strong>and</strong>'s first national lottery was<br />

held between 1567 <strong>and</strong> 1569, 100,000 tickets were offered at ten<br />

shill<strong>in</strong>gs each for a £5,000 first prize. The tickets were too<br />

expensive for all but the wealthy, <strong>and</strong> that group showed little<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> this type of gambl<strong>in</strong>g. Less than 10 per cent of the<br />

tickets were sold <strong>and</strong> prizes were reduced accord<strong>in</strong>gly. As a<br />

fund-rais<strong>in</strong>g exercise this lottery was a failure. It did, how-<br />

ever, provide <strong>in</strong>spiration for numerous less ambitious <strong>and</strong> consequently<br />

less expensive lotteries which followed. Small scale<br />

lotteries, sometimes state-run but more frequently private<br />

lotteries used as a means of sell<strong>in</strong>g goods at prov<strong>in</strong>cial fairs,<br />

achieved such enormous support from the poorer classes that<br />

legislative attempts were made <strong>in</strong> 1669 <strong>and</strong> 1710 to restrict<br />

their growth. These attempts failed <strong>and</strong> "little-goes" cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

to attract greater support; to the po<strong>in</strong>t where a parliamentary<br />

enquiry <strong>in</strong> 1808 recommended their prohibition. 18<br />

Although the wealthy <strong>and</strong> the poorer classes were attracted<br />

to different forms of gambl<strong>in</strong>g, or were motivated by different<br />

desires, they were mutually <strong>in</strong>terdependent. In particular, the<br />

major bett<strong>in</strong>g outlets provided occasions for class co-operation.<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!