Sport and Colonialism in 19th Century Australasia - LA84 Foundation
Sport and Colonialism in 19th Century Australasia - LA84 Foundation
Sport and Colonialism in 19th Century Australasia - LA84 Foundation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
AN APPROACH TO COLONIAL SPORTS HISTORY<br />
JOHN O’HARA<br />
TASMANIAN STATE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY<br />
I<br />
In recent years sports history has become someth<strong>in</strong>g of a<br />
boom area <strong>in</strong> Australian historical research <strong>and</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g. The<br />
"<strong>Sport</strong><strong>in</strong>g Traditions" conferences <strong>and</strong> subsequent publications,<br />
the establishment of the Australian Society for <strong>Sport</strong>s History<br />
<strong>and</strong> its journal, <strong>and</strong> the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g range of important major<br />
sports history works, such as those by Ric Sissons & Brian<br />
Stoddart <strong>and</strong> Richard Cashman have all helped to add a degree of<br />
"legitimacy" to the field. 1<br />
Nevertheless there rema<strong>in</strong>s a widespread<br />
degree of concern about what Bill M<strong>and</strong>le identified as<br />
the relative lack of "serious academic study of Australian sports<br />
history". 2<br />
The same concern is apparent <strong>in</strong> Wray Vamplew's call<br />
for economic historians to take sports history seriously <strong>and</strong> to<br />
revise their methods <strong>in</strong> order to apply them appropriately <strong>in</strong> this<br />
field. 3<br />
Vamplew <strong>and</strong> M<strong>and</strong>le were not attempt<strong>in</strong>g to denigrate the<br />
work done <strong>in</strong> Australian sports history to date. Rather they were<br />
concerned about the lack of sufficient models for other historians<br />
to follow <strong>and</strong> so both went on to suggest methods or ways <strong>in</strong><br />
which sports history could be approached more constructively.<br />
It is with<strong>in</strong> that tradition that this paper should be viewed.<br />
It derives from a wider study of a history of gam<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> bett<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> Australia <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> particular with the difficulties faced <strong>in</strong><br />
f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g a means of transform<strong>in</strong>g a descriptive narrative account<br />
of "firsts" <strong>and</strong> "who won what, when" <strong>in</strong>to an analytical <strong>in</strong>terpretation<br />
more <strong>in</strong> keep<strong>in</strong>g with the aims of history as a discipl<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
The purpose here is to demonstrate the value of plac<strong>in</strong>g the study<br />
<strong>in</strong> as wide an historical context as possible <strong>and</strong>, <strong>in</strong> do<strong>in</strong>g so,<br />
of compar<strong>in</strong>g Australian colonial society with that of <strong>in</strong>dustrialis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Brita<strong>in</strong>. My focus is perhaps narrow, namely gambl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
New South Wales between 1788 <strong>and</strong> 1810, but I believe the paper<br />
has relevance to the whole area of sports history, or at least<br />
for that of colonial Australia.