- Page 1 and 2: ALTERNATIVE TESTING STRATEGIES PROG
- Page 3 and 4: ALTERNATIVE TESTING STRATEGIES PROG
- Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. 2. EXECUTIVE S
- Page 7: Update on EPA’s ToxCast Programme
- Page 10 and 11: challenges, needs, and priorities f
- Page 14 and 15: Table 1. Overview of funding for
- Page 16 and 17: • Monitoring the progress of DG R
- Page 18 and 19: Member State centres on alternative
- Page 21 and 22: 2 PROGRESS REPORTS FROM EU-FUNDED P
- Page 23 and 24: The main objectives of the project
- Page 25 and 26: were also evaluated as a way to ove
- Page 27 and 28: LD 50 values were found, from studi
- Page 29 and 30: least square (PLS) multivariate reg
- Page 31 and 32: The final outcome of the work in WP
- Page 33 and 34: 3T3/NRU cytotoxicity test, rather t
- Page 35 and 36: Cytotoxic compounds No difference w
- Page 37 and 38: Table 3. The best performing in vit
- Page 39 and 40: The combinatory assay analysing tra
- Page 41 and 42: methods that gave the best predicti
- Page 43 and 44: chemicals into the official acute o
- Page 45 and 46: Pedro Buc Calderon Universite Catho
- Page 47 and 48: carcinoGENOMICS Development of a Hi
- Page 49 and 50: which are hampered by their very li
- Page 51 and 52: Analysis was performed for 6 compou
- Page 53 and 54: D11.1.8 Production of a final versi
- Page 55 and 56: Table 2. Overview of carcinoGENOMIC
- Page 57 and 58: M2.3.7 Select classic bioactivable
- Page 59 and 60: It was ultimately decided to go for
- Page 61 and 62: Publications 2010-11 1. Brolén G,
- Page 63 and 64:
ChemScreen Chemical Substance In Vi
- Page 65 and 66:
4. Establish a high-throughput mech
- Page 67 and 68:
evaluated for potential incorporati
- Page 69 and 70:
etc.). In addition, to shorten the
- Page 71 and 72:
COMICS Comet Assay and Cell Array f
- Page 73 and 74:
Use of Lesion-Secific Endonucleases
- Page 75 and 76:
Partners Co-ordinator Andrew Collin
- Page 77 and 78:
powerful toxicity testing tool. The
- Page 79 and 80:
D2.1.10 SOP for human mixed culture
- Page 81 and 82:
D0.3.2 Cell culture automation: con
- Page 83 and 84:
Experimental design for toxicity te
- Page 85 and 86:
in a multiplex chip, which will be
- Page 87 and 88:
pyrrolidone using physiologically b
- Page 89 and 90:
INVITROHEART Reducing Animal Experi
- Page 91 and 92:
Figure 2. In the left panel the tra
- Page 93 and 94:
of cardiac troponin T levels in car
- Page 95 and 96:
priate expression of the differenti
- Page 97 and 98:
Figure 2. Gene expression in human
- Page 99 and 100:
Figure 4. HepG2 hCAR-GFP Stable Cel
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure 7. A. Schematic view of diff
- Page 103 and 104:
Figure 10. A. Expression by RT-PCR
- Page 105 and 106:
Figure 11. Potential patterns of in
- Page 107 and 108:
Figure 13. Digoxin transport in bot
- Page 109 and 110:
Figure 15. Functional activity of e
- Page 111 and 112:
Table 3. Selected parameters for th
- Page 113 and 114:
in the gut) that were available in
- Page 115 and 116:
Dissemination The dissemination of
- Page 117 and 118:
NanoTEST Development of Methodology
- Page 119 and 120:
Table 1. Deliverables achieved in 2
- Page 121 and 122:
Progress made over the last year: W
- Page 123 and 124:
All NPs have been tested on airway
- Page 125 and 126:
cells in cultures in vitro stimulat
- Page 127 and 128:
to guide the development of rationa
- Page 129 and 130:
11. Cengelli F, Voinesco F, Juiller
- Page 131 and 132:
the capacity for developers to crea
- Page 133 and 134:
initiate the associated calculation
- Page 135 and 136:
P450-Mediated Drug Metabolism), Cac
- Page 137 and 138:
een implemented. With a valid OpenT
- Page 139 and 140:
datasets used in predictive toxicol
- Page 141 and 142:
models formed from three different
- Page 143 and 144:
used to generate arbitrary workflow
- Page 145 and 146:
of interoperability between applica
- Page 147 and 148:
PREDICT-IV Novel Alternative Testin
- Page 149 and 150:
integrated testing strategy togethe
- Page 151 and 152:
membrane transporters [breast cance
- Page 153 and 154:
• Stability of the compound over
- Page 155 and 156:
Publications 2010-11 1. Antherieu S
- Page 157 and 158:
Sens-it-iv Novel Testing Strategies
- Page 159 and 160:
approval by ECVAM, the European Cen
- Page 161 and 162:
information has been, and still is,
- Page 163 and 164:
and expertise collected and acquire
- Page 165 and 166:
Respiratory Skin Controls Protease
- Page 167 and 168:
21st Century: A Vision and a Strate
- Page 169 and 170:
Figure 5. Genomic Allergen Rapid De
- Page 171 and 172:
The T cell-based assays have attrac
- Page 173 and 174:
products and pharmaceutical industr
- Page 175 and 176:
22. Weber FC, Esser PR, Müller T,
- Page 177 and 178:
C. Borrebaeck Lund University (ULUN
- Page 179 and 180:
START-UP Scientific and Technologic
- Page 181 and 182:
practical work of organising 3 ‘c
- Page 183 and 184:
Furthering of Model Development, Es
- Page 185 and 186:
Conclusions In summary, the FP7 pro
- Page 187 and 188:
incentives to apply these alternati
- Page 189 and 190:
efine the model system under consid
- Page 191 and 192:
desired period of time and EC 50 va
- Page 193 and 194:
4. Based on the results from the th
- Page 195 and 196:
PROGRESS REPORTS FROM EU-FUNDED PRO
- Page 197 and 198:
3.1 Overview The second annual AXLR
- Page 199 and 200:
3.2 Scientific Programme AXLR8-2 WO
- Page 201 and 202:
18.30 - 19.00 The OECD Adverse Outc
- Page 203 and 204:
Accelerating the Transition to 21 s
- Page 205 and 206:
Current Activities The response to
- Page 207 and 208:
obust way (S. Barone, EPA Regional
- Page 209 and 210:
and the public (NRC, 2007). To that
- Page 211 and 212:
Human Skin Disease Models Monika Sc
- Page 213 and 214:
Physical / Chemical Damage A first
- Page 215 and 216:
numbers of laboratory animals neede
- Page 217 and 218:
for the Testing of Chemicals. Paris
- Page 219 and 220:
quantitatively predict aspects of t
- Page 221 and 222:
S I N U S O I D S I N U S O I D α
- Page 223 and 224:
A B from: Kienhuis et al., 2009 Fig
- Page 225 and 226:
Zellmer S, Schmidt-Heck W, Godoy P,
- Page 227 and 228:
to be achieved by sharing and joint
- Page 229 and 230:
for selected in vivo endpoints to i
- Page 231 and 232:
Partners The following list provide
- Page 233 and 234:
Table 1. HTS components of ToxCast
- Page 235 and 236:
Table 2. Predictive bioactivity sig
- Page 237 and 238:
Endpoint Brief Description of Bioac
- Page 239 and 240:
Table 3. Characteristics of chemica
- Page 241 and 242:
Conclusion In summary, significant
- Page 243 and 244:
Rotroff DM, Beam AL, Dix DJ, et al.
- Page 245 and 246:
complex situation cannot be mimicke
- Page 247 and 248:
to the prediction model used, which
- Page 249 and 250:
detecting all developmental toxican
- Page 251 and 252:
Kistler A. Inhibition of chondrogen
- Page 253 and 254:
The Virtual Embryo A Computational
- Page 255 and 256:
chemical disruption on core functio
- Page 257 and 258:
ToxCast assays revealed the potenti
- Page 259 and 260:
The GARD Test A Novel Assay for Pre
- Page 261 and 262:
Table 1. List of reference chemical
- Page 263 and 264:
non-sensitisers. This entire proces
- Page 265 and 266:
Project 3: Investigation of Assay T
- Page 267 and 268:
Skin Sensitisation Modelling the Hu
- Page 269 and 270:
Figure 1. Mechanistic overview of i
- Page 271 and 272:
sensitiser potency was the ability
- Page 273 and 274:
pathway when evaluated using the AR
- Page 275 and 276:
Acknowledgements This research is p
- Page 277 and 278:
potential. Toxicol. 2007; 231, 117-
- Page 279 and 280:
Marker Discovery & Their Functional
- Page 281 and 282:
tection method, qPCR, is a reliable
- Page 283 and 284:
vitro data may contribute to human
- Page 285 and 286:
for entering pre-validation, includ
- Page 287 and 288:
19. Lambrechts N, Hooyberghs J, Van
- Page 289 and 290:
molecular initiating event and an a
- Page 291 and 292:
molecular targets are incompletely
- Page 293 and 294:
pathway are different dependent on
- Page 295 and 296:
in silico models. As the potential
- Page 297 and 298:
key event are under development, it
- Page 299 and 300:
Lepoittevin, J.-P. 2006. Metabolism
- Page 301 and 302:
Alternatives Research in Japan High
- Page 303 and 304:
The first series the development of
- Page 305 and 306:
Conven&onal method Subjec(ve Tim
- Page 307 and 308:
Representative immunotoxicants Dies
- Page 309 and 310:
Target Promoter Firefly Firefly lu
- Page 311 and 312:
Reproductive Toxicity Suzuki N, And
- Page 313 and 314:
Risk Assessments from In Vitro Test
- Page 315 and 316:
damage (H2AX binding to DNA and mic
- Page 317 and 318:
hormones (Landers & Spelsberg, 1992
- Page 319 and 320:
are developing IVIVE models for spe
- Page 321 and 322:
Andersen ME, Krewski D. Toxicity te
- Page 323 and 324:
Safety Assessment at Unilever Apply
- Page 325 and 326:
Characterise Hazards & Exposure, as
- Page 327 and 328:
can consumer safety risk assessment
- Page 329 and 330:
in biological systems in response t
- Page 331 and 332:
Maxwell G, Aleksic M, Aptula A, et
- Page 333 and 334:
Three breakout groups (BOGs) were e
- Page 335 and 336:
3.4.2. Break-Out Group 1: Cross-Cut
- Page 337 and 338:
• Two distinct funding models wer
- Page 339 and 340:
8. How should studies in lower spec
- Page 341 and 342:
the various endpoints of developmen
- Page 343 and 344:
Table 1. International test guideli
- Page 345 and 346:
Discussion Summary • There was a
- Page 347 and 348:
Combined set of tests will be neede
- Page 349 and 350:
paradigm in 2009. J Appl Toxicol. 2
- Page 351 and 352:
The workshop concluded with an in c
- Page 353 and 354:
Proposed Structure of ‘SEURAT-2
- Page 355 and 356:
etween the Commission, Member State
- Page 357 and 358:
AXLR8-2 WORKSHOP REPORT Progress Re
- Page 359 and 360:
INVITROHEART Carl-Fredrik Mandenius
- Page 361 and 362:
NO(A)EL NP NRC OECD No observed (ad
- Page 364:
It is the aim of AXLR8 to lay the g