10.01.2015 Views

Here - Stiftung Forschung 3R

Here - Stiftung Forschung 3R

Here - Stiftung Forschung 3R

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Why is a Consortium Needed<br />

While there is considerable interest in the<br />

new toxicology tools being developed,<br />

there is, as yet, also considerable<br />

duplication of effort. In order to bring<br />

the NRC vision (2007) to fruition, both<br />

funding and coordination will be required.<br />

We believe that the vision will eventually be<br />

implemented but, without some initiative<br />

like the proposed Human Toxicology<br />

Project, it could take a lot longer (and a<br />

lot more money) than would be required<br />

if an internationally co-ordinated project<br />

were established—akin to the Human<br />

Genome Project. The analogy highlights<br />

the importance of developing an urgent<br />

focus around a common mission to<br />

overcome what are mostly challenges<br />

entailing technological improvements. It<br />

also stresses the need for international<br />

leadership.<br />

The Human Genome Project launched in<br />

1990 after almost ten years of discussions<br />

and arguments about its appropriateness<br />

and its promise. At the time of its launch,<br />

it cost $10 to sequence one DNA base<br />

pair. Today, authorities are talking about<br />

sequencing an entire human genome<br />

(around 3 billion base pairs) for $1,000<br />

and the current cost is in the $5-10,000<br />

range—a technical improvement of<br />

around 5-million fold. Collins (2003) wrote<br />

about the lessons for running large biology<br />

projects including the importance of:<br />

• Building the best teams<br />

• Ensuring that the process is sciencedriven<br />

• Meeting the managerial challenges<br />

• Seeking international participation<br />

• Establishing explicit milestones and<br />

quality assessments<br />

• Striving for technological advancement<br />

that can accelerate the project<br />

• Releasing data rapidly to demonstrate<br />

the project’s value to the community<br />

• Addressing social consequences as<br />

part of the project.<br />

Many of these lessons speak to the crosscutting<br />

issue of strategic planning, as well<br />

as other themes including communication<br />

and coordination. The Human Toxicology<br />

Project Consortium believes that a Human<br />

Genome Project-type effort should be<br />

marshalled to realise the NRC vision—<br />

and has called this initiative the Human<br />

Toxicology Project (HTP).<br />

In November of 2010, a workshop was<br />

convened in Washington to examine the<br />

prospects for launching a successful HTP.<br />

The themes and recommendations that<br />

emerged from this workshop included<br />

the need to establish an Implementation<br />

Group that would, as a central challenge,<br />

hasten the development and application<br />

of new tools and approaches beyond<br />

screening and priority-setting, to<br />

hazard identification and dose-response<br />

analysis—two key components of risk<br />

assessment. Similarly, the group should<br />

also expedite the use of the new methods<br />

to diverse risk contexts (NRC, 2007), not<br />

all of which demand assays that are highthroughput.<br />

In these ways, decision-makers<br />

can use the next generation tools and<br />

approaches to make more informed and<br />

efficient responses to diverse public health<br />

concerns faced by regulators, industry,<br />

208 AXLR8-2 WORKSHOP REPORT<br />

Progress Report 2011 & AXLR8-2 Workshop Report

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!