10.01.2015 Views

Here - Stiftung Forschung 3R

Here - Stiftung Forschung 3R

Here - Stiftung Forschung 3R

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ToxCast assays revealed the potential<br />

consequences to angiogenesis, based on<br />

the scientific knowledge, empirical data,<br />

and emergent systems-level properties<br />

(Kleinstreuer, work in progress).<br />

Challenges & Next Steps<br />

Virtual Embryo models can be used in<br />

several ways to extrapolate predictions<br />

from cell-level data to developing organ<br />

systems, although a good amount of<br />

biological detail is needed to build cellagent-based<br />

models and asses model<br />

performance. This exploits the advantages<br />

of a screening-level approach such as in<br />

vitro profiling, in which HTS data and in<br />

vitro assays probe lower levels of biological<br />

organisation that are faster and less<br />

expensive than traditional animal studies<br />

to analyse key events in a potential adverse<br />

outcome pathway. Whereas computational<br />

modelling can significantly aid generating<br />

in vivo hypotheses from the in vitro data and<br />

yield insight into systems-level behaviour,<br />

the virtual models must be grounded in<br />

results from actual experimentation.<br />

A toolbox of virtual tissue models that<br />

recapitulate critical embryonic processes<br />

provide biological context to HTS data to<br />

predict, from a computer simulation, the<br />

consequences at a higher level of biological<br />

organisation. As the models are tested and<br />

refined we anticipate users can exercise<br />

complex scenarios across a broad range<br />

of parameter sweeps to prospectively<br />

(predictive models) or retrospectively<br />

(analytical models) assess the nonlinear<br />

behavior of a complex adaptive system.<br />

Disclaimer<br />

The views expressed in this paper are those<br />

of the authors and do not necessarily reflect<br />

the views or policies of the US Environmental<br />

Protection Agency. Mention of trade names<br />

or commercial products does not constitute<br />

endorsement or recommendation for use.<br />

References<br />

1. NRC [US National Research Council]. Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision<br />

and a Strategy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2007.<br />

2. Judson RS, Houck KA, Kavlock RJ, et al. Predictive in vitro screening of environmental<br />

chemicals – the ToxCast project. Env Hlth Perspect. 2010; 118, 485-92.<br />

3. Martin MT, Knudsen TB, Reif DM, et al. Predictive model of reproductive toxicity from<br />

ToxCast high throughput screening. Biol Reprod. 2011 (doi biolreprod.111.090977).<br />

4. Sipes NS, Kleinstreuer NC, Judson RS, et al. Predictive models of prenatal<br />

developmental toxicity from ToxCast high-throughput screening. Toxicol Sci. 2011<br />

[In press] Epub (doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfr220).<br />

5. Reif D, Martin M, Tan S, et al. Endocrine Profiling and Prioritization of Environmental<br />

Chemicals Using ToxCast Data. Environ Hlth Perspect. 2010; 118, 1714-20.<br />

6. Chandler KJ, Barrier M, Jeffay S, et al. Evaluation of 309 environmental chemicals<br />

using a mouse embryonic stem cell adherent cell differentiation and cytotoxicity<br />

AXLR8-2 WORKSHOP REPORT<br />

Progress Report 2011 & AXLR8-2 Workshop Report<br />

257

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!