2007 - Potatoes at WSU - Washington State University

LTS
2007 Late Harvest Tri-State Trial
W A ID O R 3 State av.
R ating R ating R ating R ating
C lone Total § D iscard §§ Total § D iscard §§ Total § D iscard §§ Total
6 A98345-1 31.5 36.1 33.9 33.8
8 AO 96305-3 35.9 32.7 32.6 33.7
16 PA99N 82-4 35.0 31.8 25.4 Sp. G r. 30.7
4 A96814-65LB 32.7 33.0 24.6 30.1
14 PA99N 12-1 33.4 36.7 19.1 29.7
5 A97066-42LB 25.1 32.7 26.9 28.2
15 PA99N 2-1 33.0 34.0 17.6 28.2
9 AO 96365-2 32.0 31.6 17.9 27.2
7 A99073-1 26.0 30.3 Sp. G r. 24.9 Sp. G r. 27.1
3 A0008-1TE 35.5 24.5 20.9 Sp. G r. 27.0
10 PA00N 14-2 28.8 33.6 17.8 26.7
12 PA98N M 38-1 27.7 28.1 23.6 26.5
1 R anger R usset 26.0 31.6 21.3 26.3
11 PA00N 15-2 25.8 25.5 14.4 21.9
2 R usset Burbank 28.6 20.5 Sp. G r. 9.7 19.6
13 PA98N M 39-1 18.2 21.3 16.2 18.6
Average 29.7 30.3 21.7 27.2
§ m axim um rating possible = 38
Accumulated Total Postharvest Rating of Clones
§§ Values for the indicated evaluation are low er than the rejection level.
Overall Postharvest Performance of Clones Compared to Russet Bubank
C lone W A ID O R Average
1 R anger R usset L H H H
3 A0008-1TE H H H H
4 A96814-65LB H H H H
5 A97066-42LB L H H H
6 A98345-1 H H H H
7 A99073-1 L H H H
8 AO 96305-3 H H H H
9 AO 96365-2 H H H H
10 PA00N 14-2 H H H H
11 PA00N 15-2 L H H H
12 PA98N M 38-1 L H H H
13 PA98N M 39-1 L H H L
14 PA99N 12-1 H H H H
15 PA99N 2-1 H H H H
16 PA99N 82-4 H H H H
H = Higher H igher than than Russet R usset Burbank Burbank
S= S = Same e as as Russet R usset Burbank Burbank
L= L = Lower er than Russet R usset Burbank Burbank
2007 Potato Cultivar Evaluations 52 WSU Potato Research Group