Strategic Housing Market Assessment - North Devon District Council
Strategic Housing Market Assessment - North Devon District Council
Strategic Housing Market Assessment - North Devon District Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SHMA: Torridge and <strong>North</strong> <strong>Devon</strong> Update<br />
Key findings:<br />
• The <strong>North</strong> <strong>Devon</strong> map shows that there were 10 small areas with high<br />
deprivation (10% most nationally deprived) for the Barriers to <strong>Housing</strong><br />
and Services Domain, and a further 13 areas with fairly high<br />
deprivation (30% most nationally deprived).<br />
• The Torridge map shows that there were 14 small areas with high<br />
deprivation (10% most nationally deprived) for the Barriers to <strong>Housing</strong><br />
and Services Domain and a further 5 small areas with fairly high<br />
deprivation (30% most nationally deprived).<br />
• The Wider Barriers map shows no areas with high levels of deprivation<br />
in small areas for the <strong>Housing</strong> Indicators (none in the 20% most<br />
nationally deprived). There is one small area with fairly high relative<br />
deprivation in the top 30% located in Ilfracombe. This is the same<br />
LSOA that has high multiple deprivation, income deprivation and living<br />
environment deprivation (E01020112 Ilfracombe Harbour and Seafront) in<br />
the ILFR SMA.<br />
• There are a further 12 areas in the 40% most nationally deprived and<br />
another 14 areas in the 50% most nationally deprived.<br />
• The Geographical Barriers map shows that there are 33 small areas<br />
with high deprivation (10% most nationally deprived) and a further 23<br />
small areas with fairly high deprivation (30% most nationally deprived).<br />
This covers a large part of the geographical area including many rural<br />
areas. The areas with lowest deprivation for access to services are<br />
largely urban.<br />
2.23 Pulling together data and information that has been collated on<br />
deprivation, it is possible to draw the following conclusions:<br />
• Both the Rank of the Average Rank and the Rank of the Average<br />
Scores Indicators from the Local Authority <strong>District</strong> Summaries of the<br />
English Indices of Deprivation 2010 show that Torridge is relatively<br />
more deprived than <strong>North</strong> <strong>Devon</strong>.<br />
• Torridge falls in the 40% most deprived local authorities in England<br />
and <strong>North</strong> <strong>Devon</strong> falls in the 50% most deprived using the Rank of<br />
Average Scores and Rank of Average Ranks in the Local Authority<br />
<strong>District</strong> Summaries for the English Indices of Deprivation 2010.<br />
• Despite Torridge ranking higher than <strong>North</strong> <strong>Devon</strong> in the LA <strong>District</strong><br />
Summaries, <strong>North</strong> <strong>Devon</strong> has more small pockets with higher levels<br />
of both multiple deprivation and income deprivation than Torridge.<br />
42