Environmental Assessment - National Capital Planning Commission

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Environmental Assessment The EA results in either a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) or a decision to prepare an EIS. If, based on this EA, the Navy determines that the proposed action would have no significant impacts on the quality of the human environment, a FONSI will be issued. If the Navy determines that the proposed action would have a significant impact on the quality of the human environment, preparation of an EIS will be initiated. Purpose and Need 1-4
2. Proposed Action and Alternatives The Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ) regulations for implementing NEPA establish a number of policies for Federal agencies, including using “…the NEPA process to identify and assess the reasonable alternatives to proposed actions that will avoid or minimize adverse effects of these actions upon the quality of the human environment” (40 CFR 1500.2[e]). This chapter describes the proposed action (Section 2.1) and the alternatives considered by the Navy to meet its purpose and need (Sections 2.2.1 and 2.2.2). Section 2.2.3 addresses the No Action Alternative. 2.1 Proposed Action The proposed action is to relocate NSMA’s 800 personnel, equipment, and programs from their current, various locations in Arlington County, VA, to NSF Anacostia in Washington, DC. To accommodate the agency, a new facility would be constructed, consisting of two elements: an administrative building and a warehouse (see Figure 2-1). The administrative building would provide approximately 160,000 gross square feet of space, with a footprint of approximately 32,000 square feet. It would be a reinforced steel-framed masonry structure on a pile foundation system. About half the roof would be dedicated to a green roof feature and about 30 percent to a paved deck accessible to personnel during breaks and lunch hour. To accommodate NSMA’s security requirements, the building would include five independent zoned Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) areas. Fenestration would be limited to the public lobby area. Interior spaces would include closed offices and open work areas, conference rooms, a photographic laboratory, storage areas, restrooms, mechanical and electrical rooms, and support spaces (e.g., stairwells and elevators). Connections to existing utility systems (water, sanitary and storm sewers, electricity, and data) would be provided. 2-1 Alternatives
Page 2 and 3: THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Page 6 and 7: Environmental Assessment ES.3 Alter
Page 8 and 9: Environmental Assessment Socioecono
Page 10 and 11: Environmental Assessment Cultural R
Page 12 and 13: Environmental Assessment included i
Page 14 and 15: Environmental Assessment THIS PAGE
Page 16 and 17: Environmental Assessment 3.1.2.2 Na
Page 18 and 19: Environmental Assessment 4.4.2.3 St
Page 20 and 21: List of Figures Figure Following Pa
Page 22 and 23: Environmental Assessment DDOE DDOT
Page 24 and 25: Environmental Assessment ppm PPV Pa
Page 28 and 29: Environmental Assessment costly tha
Page 36 and 37: Environmental Assessment Exterior w
Page 40 and 41: Environmental Assessment the Nation
Page 42 and 43: Environmental Assessment 2.2.2.1 Re
Page 50 and 51: Environmental Assessment Resource A
Page 54 and 55: Environmental Assessment uses and t
Page 56 and 57: Environmental Assessment 3.1.1.3 Al
Page 58 and 59: Environmental Assessment Agencies s
Page 60 and 61: Environmental Assessment transporta
Page 62 and 63: Environmental Assessment Bolling AF
Page 64 and 65: Environmental Assessment Table 3-1
Page 66 and 67: Environmental Assessment According
Page 68 and 69: Environmental Assessment Metrorail
Page 70 and 71: Environmental Assessment 1. South C
Page 74 and 75: Environmental Assessment LOS is a m
Page 76 and 77: Environmental Assessment destinatio
Page 78 and 79: Environmental Assessment attainment
Page 80 and 81: Environmental Assessment source thr
Page 82 and 83: Environmental Assessment District o
Page 84 and 85:
Environmental Assessment foundation
Page 86 and 87:
Environmental Assessment 3.7.2.2 Pr
Page 88 and 89:
Environmental Assessment 3) Engage
Page 90 and 91:
Environmental Assessment TPH-DRO wa
Page 92 and 93:
Environmental Assessment half-open,
Page 94 and 95:
Environmental Assessment reusing ex
Page 96 and 97:
Environmental Assessment of the exi
Page 98 and 99:
Environmental Assessment and its im
Page 100 and 101:
Environmental Assessment children o
Page 102 and 103:
Environmental Assessment opposed to
Page 104 and 105:
Environmental Assessment Table 4-2
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Environmental Assessment 4.3.3 Bell
Page 110 and 111:
Environmental Assessment 4.3.3.3 Pa
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Environmental Assessment for that p
Page 116 and 117:
Environmental Assessment 4.5.2.2 Co
Page 118 and 119:
Environmental Assessment consolidat
Page 120 and 121:
Environmental Assessment therefore,
Page 122 and 123:
Environmental Assessment result in
Page 124 and 125:
Environmental Assessment projects w
Page 126 and 127:
Environmental Assessment Naval Supp
Page 128 and 129:
Environmental Assessment Navy Coord
Page 130 and 131:
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Environmental Assessment B.2.2 Math
Page 138 and 139:
Environmental Assessment number of
Page 140 and 141:
Environmental Assessment significan
Page 142 and 143:
Environmental Assessment Anacostia.
Page 144 and 145:
Environmental Assessment Typical lo
Page 146 and 147:
Environmental Assessment Table B-3
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152:
Environmental Assessment References
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
NSMA Relocation Traffic Impact Stud
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
S. Capitol St. SB Southbound Peggy
Page 194 and 195:
Southbound Peggy Malone & Associate
Page 196 and 197:
I-295 NB Off Ramp Southbound Peggy
Page 198 and 199:
S. Capitol St. Southbound Peggy Mal
Page 200 and 201:
Overlook Ave. (1 Way) Southbound Pe
Page 202 and 203:
Overlook Ave. Southbound Peggy Malo
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
General Information Analyst NVD Age
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
HCS+ DETAILED REPORT General Infor
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
A B C D E F G H N B C south gate 24
Page 268:
show all

Environmental Assessment - National Capital Planning Commission

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?