Environmental Assessment - National Capital Planning Commission
Environmental Assessment - National Capital Planning Commission
Environmental Assessment - National Capital Planning Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Capital</strong> Region that could potentially accommodate<br />
NSMA: the Washington Navy Yard; NSF Anacostia; and Bellevue<br />
Housing, just south of NSF Anacostia and Bolling AFB (see<br />
Section 1.1.2).<br />
2.2.1 Alternatives Considered but Dismissed<br />
2.2.1.1 Relocating NSMA to the Washington Navy Yard<br />
Early in the planning process, the Navy considered relocating<br />
NSMA to the Washington Navy Yard. However, the Washington Navy<br />
Yard could only accommodate NSMA’s requirement for<br />
administrative space, because the Navy Yard has no adequate<br />
existing warehousing space available. Nor does it have any room<br />
to construct a new warehouse adequate to NSMA’s needs.<br />
Therefore, any alternative that would relocate NSMA to the<br />
Washington Navy Yard would require keeping the administrative<br />
building and warehouse separate. Under Criterion 3, such an<br />
alternative could be reasonable only if it presents a strong<br />
advantage that could make up for the disadvantage of keeping the<br />
agency’s administrative and warehousing functions physically<br />
apart.<br />
With respect to the Washington Navy Yard, only one factor could<br />
be considered to constitute such a strong advantage: a small<br />
group of NSMA employees is already present in Building 111. The<br />
cost and inconvenience of moving these employees would be<br />
avoided if the rest of the agency joined them. Therefore, the<br />
Navy considered renovating Building 111 for use by NSMA.<br />
However, independent planning considerations resulted in<br />
Building 111’s being assigned to a different command. This<br />
eliminated the possibility of NSMA’s moving to the building and<br />
made it likely that the NSMA employees in Building 111 would<br />
have to move to join the rest of the agency in its new building.<br />
This eliminated the only strong advantage of relocating NSMA to<br />
the Navy Yard. Even if the NSMA employees currently in Building<br />
111 were able to stay in that building, there is no available<br />
space at the Navy Yard that could adequately accommodate the<br />
rest of agency. Therefore, alternatives that would relocate NSMA<br />
to the Washington Navy Yard were eliminated from further<br />
consideration. Such alternatives are not considered in the rest<br />
of this EA.<br />
Alternatives 2-4