11.01.2015 Views

Environmental Assessment - National Capital Planning Commission

Environmental Assessment - National Capital Planning Commission

Environmental Assessment - National Capital Planning Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Capital</strong> Region that could potentially accommodate<br />

NSMA: the Washington Navy Yard; NSF Anacostia; and Bellevue<br />

Housing, just south of NSF Anacostia and Bolling AFB (see<br />

Section 1.1.2).<br />

2.2.1 Alternatives Considered but Dismissed<br />

2.2.1.1 Relocating NSMA to the Washington Navy Yard<br />

Early in the planning process, the Navy considered relocating<br />

NSMA to the Washington Navy Yard. However, the Washington Navy<br />

Yard could only accommodate NSMA’s requirement for<br />

administrative space, because the Navy Yard has no adequate<br />

existing warehousing space available. Nor does it have any room<br />

to construct a new warehouse adequate to NSMA’s needs.<br />

Therefore, any alternative that would relocate NSMA to the<br />

Washington Navy Yard would require keeping the administrative<br />

building and warehouse separate. Under Criterion 3, such an<br />

alternative could be reasonable only if it presents a strong<br />

advantage that could make up for the disadvantage of keeping the<br />

agency’s administrative and warehousing functions physically<br />

apart.<br />

With respect to the Washington Navy Yard, only one factor could<br />

be considered to constitute such a strong advantage: a small<br />

group of NSMA employees is already present in Building 111. The<br />

cost and inconvenience of moving these employees would be<br />

avoided if the rest of the agency joined them. Therefore, the<br />

Navy considered renovating Building 111 for use by NSMA.<br />

However, independent planning considerations resulted in<br />

Building 111’s being assigned to a different command. This<br />

eliminated the possibility of NSMA’s moving to the building and<br />

made it likely that the NSMA employees in Building 111 would<br />

have to move to join the rest of the agency in its new building.<br />

This eliminated the only strong advantage of relocating NSMA to<br />

the Navy Yard. Even if the NSMA employees currently in Building<br />

111 were able to stay in that building, there is no available<br />

space at the Navy Yard that could adequately accommodate the<br />

rest of agency. Therefore, alternatives that would relocate NSMA<br />

to the Washington Navy Yard were eliminated from further<br />

consideration. Such alternatives are not considered in the rest<br />

of this EA.<br />

Alternatives 2-4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!