strategies to counter opiate in Afghanistan - Groupe URD

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4.4 … funded by specific anti-drug funds 51 4.4.1 The Counter-Narcotics Trust Fund – a fund for national counter-narcotics programmes 51 4.4.2 The Good Performer’s Initiative – direct aid given to provinces making progress in the fight against drugs 53 4.4.3 The Comprehensive Agriculture and Rural Development Facility, an assessment and integration tool 54 4.5 Opium poppy and development: what results so far 56 4.5.1 Impacts which are difficult to quantify 56 4.5.2 The need to move from pilot projects to large-scale programmes for the long term 57 4.5.3 Opium poppy or development: are we aiming at the right target 58 5. THE OTHER FRONTS IN THE FIGHT AGAINST DRUGS 61 5.1 Eradication 61 5.2 Interdiction and repression 64 5.2.1 International and regional cooperation to reduce cross-border trafficking 64 5.2.2 Law enforcement (arrests) 65 5.2.3 Criminal Justice 66 5.3 Public Awareness 67 5.4 Demand reduction 68 5.5 Institution building 70 5.6 Constraints for a genuinely integrated approach in the fight against opiates 71 5.6.1 An integrated approach or parallel pillars 71 5.6.2 Different perceptions, different approaches: the difficulty of coordination 72 6. CONCLUSION 75 7. RECOMMENDATIONS 77 7.1 Strategic recommendations 77 7.2 Operational recommendations for socio-economic development programmes 78 ANNEXES 81 4
ACRONYMS ADP Alternative Development Programme AFD Agence Française de Développement AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome ANDS Afghanistan National Development Strategy AREDP Afghanistan Rural Entreprise Development Programme ARIES Afghanistan Rural Investment and Entreprise Strengthening BRAC Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee CARD - F Comprehensive Agriculture and Rural Development - Facility CDC Community Development Councils CEPC Central Eradication Planning Cell CERP Commanders Emergency Response Fund CJTF Criminal Justice Task Force CNPA Counter Narcotics Police of Afghanistan CNTF Counter Narcotics Trust Fund DACAAR Danish Committee for Aid to Afghan Refugees DEA Drug Enforcement Administration DFID Department for International Development (UK) DoJ Department of Justice EU European Union FAO Food and Agriculture organization FCO Foreign & Commonwealth Office (UK) GAA German Agro Action GDP Gross Domestic Product GLE Governor-led Eradication GPI Good Performer's Initiative GTZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus HR Harm Reduction ICOS International Council on Security and Development IDEA-NEWS Incentives Driving Economic Alternatives / North, East, West IDPA Integrated Drug Prevention, Treatment, and Rehabilitation Project in Afghanistan IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development IFC International Finance Corporation INL Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs ISAF International Security Assistance Force JSU Judiciary Security Unit MAIL Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock MCN Ministry of Counter-narcotics MDM Médécins du Monde Strategies to counter opiate production in Afghanistan Groupe URD | Juin 2010 5
Page 1 and 2: STRATEGIES TO COUNTER OPIATE PRODUC
Page 3: CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 1. INT
Page 7 and 8: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Almost ten years
Page 9 and 10: have had a long-term impact on opiu
Page 11 and 12: poppy cultivation in a sustainable
Page 13: 11. It is important to improve the
Page 17 and 18: 2. Object, methodology and limits o
Page 19 and 20: 3. Opium in Afghanistan 3.1 The hug
Page 21 and 22: Figure 3. Distribution of opium cul
Page 23 and 24: governor and they had been impoveri
Page 25 and 26: hand, the decision not to cultivate
Page 27 and 28: • The production of opium in othe
Page 29 and 30: Table 1. Factors which influence th
Page 31 and 32: Table 2 presents the four prioritie
Page 33 and 34: 4. Opium poppies and development De
Page 35 and 36: 4.1.1 Poor competitivity of alterna
Page 37 and 38: Profit margin per hectare Ease of s
Page 39 and 40: 4.1.2 Difficulties in establishing
Page 41 and 42: Box 2. “Roses for Nangarhar” an
Page 43 and 44: Table 5. Principal characteristics
Page 45 and 46: It is also important to note that m
Page 47 and 48: eing given to agricultural programm
Page 49 and 50: implementation and involving both t
Page 51 and 52: Development Bank because it was too
Page 53 and 54: The creation of jobs in non-produci
Page 55 and 56:
As very little progress has been ma
Page 57 and 58:
Box 3. An attempt to analyse the re
Page 59:
full use. Though the question of la
Page 62 and 63:
Eradication was the subject of deba
Page 64 and 65:
5.2 Interdiction and repression 5.2
Page 66 and 67:
5.2.3 Criminal Justice The objectiv
Page 68 and 69:
However, these operations often hav
Page 70 and 71:
Box 5. The Harm reduction program f
Page 72 and 73:
Helmand, which was developed by the
Page 75:
6. Conclusion Considerable effort h
Page 78 and 79:
political stability is a pre-requis
Page 80 and 81:
deployment capacity of existing cre
Page 82 and 83:
COUNTER-NARCOTICS TRUST FUND (CNTF)
Page 84 and 85:
MANSFIELD, D. Water management, liv
Page 86 and 87:
KARZAI, H. Stabilizing Afghanistan:
Page 88 and 89:
Annex 3: Opium poppy cultivation in
Page 90 and 91:
Opium poppy has been cultivated in
Page 92 and 93:
Annex 4: Typology of opium-producin
Page 96:
Groupe URD La Fontaine des Marins 2
show all

strategies to counter opiate in Afghanistan - Groupe URD

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?