12.01.2015 Views

strategies to counter opiate in Afghanistan - Groupe URD

strategies to counter opiate in Afghanistan - Groupe URD

strategies to counter opiate in Afghanistan - Groupe URD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.<br />

The other fronts <strong>in</strong> the fight aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

drugs<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g sections present the objectives, pr<strong>in</strong>cipal results, constra<strong>in</strong>ts and lessons<br />

learned for each of the other NDCS pillars of action (cf. table 2).<br />

5.1 Eradication<br />

The objective of this pillar is <strong>to</strong> build the capacity <strong>to</strong> conduct targeted and verified groundbased<br />

eradication.<br />

Box 4. Enforced eradication: <strong>counter</strong>-productive and dest<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>to</strong> fail<br />

As <strong>in</strong> other drug-produc<strong>in</strong>g countries, eradication has rarely been successful <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Afghanistan</strong>. The World Bank report (2004) highlights that, “eradication <strong>in</strong> the<br />

absence of alternative livelihoods be<strong>in</strong>g available does not work, and eradication<br />

followed by assistance does not seem <strong>to</strong> work well, yet eradication (and its threat)<br />

can help re<strong>in</strong>force alternative livelihoods development if the former follows the<br />

latter”. It also states that “a key lesson is that eradication alone will not work and is<br />

likely <strong>to</strong> be <strong>counter</strong>productive, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> perverse <strong>in</strong>centives for farmers <strong>to</strong> grow<br />

more drugs (e.g. <strong>in</strong> Colombia), displacement of production <strong>to</strong> more remote areas,<br />

and fuell<strong>in</strong>g of violence and <strong>in</strong>security (Peru, Bolivia, Colombia). Examples of<br />

eradication <strong>in</strong> Asia (Thailand, Pakistan, Myanmar and Laos) have also shown how<br />

eradication can contribute <strong>to</strong> armed violence. As a result, the governments of these<br />

countries have abandoned it as a <strong>counter</strong>-narcotic strategy (Chouvy, 2009)<br />

The risks and pr<strong>in</strong>cipal negative effects of eradication <strong>in</strong> <strong>Afghanistan</strong> are:<br />

It makes farmers, who make the least from drug traffick<strong>in</strong>g and sometimes<br />

have no other option than <strong>to</strong> cultivate opium, even poorer. This is especially the case<br />

if the eradication takes place at the harvest time (mean<strong>in</strong>g that the farmer has no<br />

time <strong>to</strong> plant other crops) and/or if the eradication is not accompanied by any<br />

development or food aid activities.<br />

It fuels or develops resentment aga<strong>in</strong>st the government and the <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

community and <strong>in</strong>creases the population’s support for the <strong>in</strong>surgency.<br />

It prompts farmers <strong>to</strong> grow more: <strong>in</strong> the past, compensation given for<br />

eradicated areas pushed certa<strong>in</strong> farmers <strong>to</strong> cultivate opium poppy <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> get<br />

compensation.<br />

Strategies <strong>to</strong> <strong>counter</strong> <strong>opiate</strong> production <strong>in</strong> <strong>Afghanistan</strong><br />

<strong>Groupe</strong> <strong>URD</strong> | Ju<strong>in</strong> 2010<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!