16.01.2015 Views

Rebuilding Lives. Strengthening Communities.

Rebuilding Lives. Strengthening Communities.

Rebuilding Lives. Strengthening Communities.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Advocate for revision of the methodology of the U.S. Census, which<br />

currently counts incarcerated individuals as residents of the prisons<br />

instead of their home communities.<br />

Recommendation<br />

Issue<br />

A longstanding quirk in census rules counts incarcerated<br />

people as “residents” of the prisons—locations where most<br />

are held for only a short time—instead of residents from<br />

the towns and cities where they actually lived. This<br />

methodology pre-dates high incarceration rates or modern<br />

uses of demographic data. But with 1.4 million people in<br />

state and federal prison today, padding electoral districts’<br />

population figures shifts political power from the densely<br />

populated urban areas where most prisoners live to the<br />

less populated rural districts where prisons often are<br />

built. 84<br />

As a result, the current census figures inflate the<br />

population of communities in Illinois where the majority<br />

of prisons are located and undercount Chicago’s population.<br />

This is not just an issue of statistical trivia; rather it<br />

poses significant questions as to Chicago’s proper<br />

representation in Springfield and its eligibility for state and<br />

federal funding.<br />

Solution<br />

Counting prisoners at their pre-prison addresses would<br />

cure what has clearly become a troubling flaw in the<br />

census process. This methodology can be modified at<br />

either the federal or state level. Federally, the Census<br />

Bureau could simply change its procedures before the<br />

2010 census. On the state level, passage of House Bill<br />

906, the Prisoner Census Adjustment Act, introduced by<br />

Representative Arthur L. Turner in 2005, would require<br />

the Illinois Secretary of State to create a specially modified<br />

version of the Census Bureau’s redistricting data that<br />

would enumerate prisoners as residents of their actual<br />

home communities.<br />

To grow and develop into healthy, viable settings,<br />

Chicago’s communities should advocate for fair representation<br />

in the calculation of its formerly incarcerated<br />

population.<br />

MAYORAL POLICY CAUCUS ON PRISONER REENTRY<br />

Each decade, the Illinois state legislature uses U.S. Census<br />

data to redraw its legislative district boundaries so that<br />

each district will contain the same number of people as<br />

required under the 14th Amendment’s One Person One<br />

Vote rule. This ensures that each resident gets equal access<br />

to government, but this principle is diluted when census<br />

numbers fail to accurately reflect where the state’s<br />

population actually resides. Incarcerated individuals<br />

cannot even vote in Illinois; it is ironic, then, that they<br />

count as constituents when state legislators draw up<br />

legislative districts.<br />

Each Chicago resident miscounted by the census dilutes<br />

Chicago’s representation twice. First, it reduces the number<br />

of Representatives and Senators from the City of<br />

Chicago, and then again it increases the number of<br />

Representatives and Senators from other parts of the state.<br />

This gives districts with prisons undeserved strength in<br />

the state legislature and more influence than they would<br />

otherwise have in state affairs. By counting impoverished<br />

prisoners as residents of prison districts, these counties<br />

also reap more than their fair share of federal dollars<br />

earmarked for the poor.<br />

106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!