17.01.2015 Views

Download PDF - Anchor Environmental

Download PDF - Anchor Environmental

Download PDF - Anchor Environmental

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

For this study, a count of water-associated birds was conducted in late February 2010, when<br />

summer migrant numbers are usually maximal. Birds were recorded from the mouth to the<br />

section of the estuary where the wider channel becomes a series of smaller braided channels,<br />

approximately 3 km from the mouth.<br />

Counts during this study showed a drastic decrease in bird numbers compared to previous<br />

years, while diversity was not affected as much (Table 4). Only 435 individuals were recorded,<br />

the majority of these being Kelp Gulls (310 individuals). Most birds (89%) were found in the<br />

sandflats above the bridge (Error! Reference source not found.). Ten species were piscivores<br />

nd 12 species were invertebrate-feeding waders. No herbivores were recorded. Compared to<br />

the study by Barnes (1996) the proportion of invertebrate-feeders, piscivores and herbivores<br />

was similar. Barnes (1996) recorded 15 species of piscivores, 18 species of invertebratefeeders<br />

and one species of herbivore (Egyptian Goose).<br />

The low numbers can be explained by the significant decrease in the numbers of Curlew<br />

Sandpipers, as well as only a small number of terns being present (32 individuals) as compared<br />

to previous counts (Error! Reference source not found.). Curlew Sandpiper has been recorded<br />

t the estuary in high numbers during every previous survey conducted (Error! Reference source<br />

not found.). It is an Arctic-breeding migratory species, and is found in southern Africa from<br />

August/November to March/April. It forages for nereid worms, snails and crustaceans mainly<br />

in the intertidal area of coastal lagoons and estuaries and on sheltered open shores with much<br />

stranded algae (Hockey et al. 2005). The estuary was closed to the sea during the study and<br />

had been closed for approximately two months. Therefore, the large inter-tidal feeding habitat<br />

which covered the entire sandflat region below and above the road bridge was lost. Most<br />

inter-tidal invertebrates had probably desiccated and died or migrated elsewhere. While many<br />

sandprawn burrows were still present, these animals are able to burrow deeper to a level of<br />

sufficient moisture in dry times and are often found in closed systems. They are also very<br />

tolerant of varying salinities (Forbes 1974). Due to their large size and the depth of their<br />

burrows it is unlikely that sandprawns can be utilised as prey by small invertebrate-feeding<br />

waders.<br />

Kelp Gulls were recorded roosting for the first time in high numbers at Uilkraals with 310<br />

individuals recorded (Table 5). Barnes (1996) recorded 67 and Ryan et al. (1988) recorded 77<br />

individuals. On the day of the count a strong south-easterly wind was blowing and it is possible<br />

that this species seeks shelter in the estuary sporadically. Similar numbers of Kelp Gulls were,<br />

however, still present the following two days, even after the wind had died down. The low<br />

numbers of terns recorded are of particular concern as this site was once a major roost for<br />

several tern species including the Caspian Tern, Sandwich Tern and Swift Tern, of which it<br />

hosted 6.8%, 2.8% and 6.6% respectively of the south-western Cape’s population (Barnes<br />

1996). Whimbrel has previously been recorded in high numbers at the estuary (76 and 65<br />

individuals) making it the second largest population in the south-western Cape after Langebaan<br />

Lagoon (Barnes 1996). Only 17 individuals were recorded in this study. Whimbrel are relatively<br />

sensitive to disturbance and higher levels of recreational use of the estuary by people may be a<br />

contributing factor, in addition to the loss of intertidal feeding habitat.<br />

Uilkraals Estuary Situation Assessment<br />

30<br />

<strong>Anchor</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!