19.01.2015 Views

April Journal-2009.p65 - Association of Biotechnology and Pharmacy

April Journal-2009.p65 - Association of Biotechnology and Pharmacy

April Journal-2009.p65 - Association of Biotechnology and Pharmacy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Current Trends in <strong>Biotechnology</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pharmacy</strong><br />

Vol. 3 (2) 181-187, <strong>April</strong> 2009. ISSN 0973-8916<br />

each genotype to develop disease. Differences<br />

in genotype frequency distribution between<br />

disease <strong>and</strong> control groups was done using 2*2<br />

χ2 <strong>and</strong> χ2 test for heterogeneity.<br />

Results <strong>and</strong> Discussion<br />

The cytochrome P450 (CYP) catalyzes<br />

the metabolism <strong>of</strong> numerous exogenous <strong>and</strong><br />

endogenous molecules. CYP3A5 was found to<br />

be more efficient in activating aflotoxin B1 to<br />

carcinogenic form (9). CYP3A5 was considered<br />

as a c<strong>and</strong>idate gene for prostate cancer as the<br />

expression was observed in both normal as well<br />

as in tumor tissue, whereas CYP3A4 expression<br />

was limited to normal prostate tissue. The<br />

hypothesis that prostate cancer risk might be<br />

associated with CYP3A5 genotype had been<br />

strengthened by the report <strong>of</strong> linkage<br />

183<br />

disequilibrium between CYP3A5 <strong>and</strong> CYP3A4<br />

alleles (10). The proportion <strong>of</strong> CYP3A4*1B <strong>and</strong><br />

CYP3A5*1 alleles was found to be increased in<br />

liver, gastric <strong>and</strong> colorectal cancer patients (11)<br />

<strong>and</strong> these findings were in accordance with other<br />

studies from Caucasian population (12).<br />

In the present study, the frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

heterozygotes for CYP3A5*1 (1/3) was<br />

significantly increased in breast cancer (53.0%)<br />

when compared to controls (41.4%) with<br />

corresponding increase in 3A5*1 allele frequency<br />

(Table 1). The study group showed deviation from<br />

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium but not controls<br />

(÷2=0.58) indicating selective forces operating in<br />

disease group (÷2=5.09*) (Table 1). The<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> CYP3A5*3 allele was found to be<br />

similar in both leukemia (CML, AML) group <strong>and</strong><br />

controls (7). Nogal et al (13) had reported that<br />

Table 1. CYP3A5*3 polymorphism with respect to breast cancer <strong>and</strong> epidemiological parameters<br />

Parameters 1/1 1/3 3/3 Allele<br />

Frequency<br />

n % n % n % 1 3<br />

Disease (249) 25 10.0 132 53.0 92 37.0 0.37 0.63<br />

Controls (249) 28 11.2 103 41.4 118 47.4 0.32 0.68<br />

Menopausal Status<br />

Premenopausal (124) 10 8.1 72 58.1 42 33.9 0.37 0.63<br />

Postmenopausal (125) 15 12.0 60 48.0 50 40.0 0.36 0.64<br />

Familial History<br />

Familial (74) 2 2.7 32 43.2 40 54.1 0.24 0.76<br />

Non-Familial (176) 2 1.1 70 39.8 104 59.1 0.21 0.79<br />

BMI<br />

30 (45) 4 8.9 21 46.7 20 44.5 0.32 0.68<br />

Occupation<br />

Housewives (173) 2 1.2 66 38.2 105 60.7 0.20 0.80<br />

Agriculture (27) 0 0 15 55.6 12 44.4 0.28 0.72<br />

White-Collar Jobs (43) 2 4.7 17 39.5 24 55.8 0.24 0.76<br />

Others (7) 0 0 4 57.1 3 42.9 0.21 0.79<br />

CYP3A5*3 <strong>and</strong> CYP3A5*6 Polymorphisms <strong>and</strong> Breast Cancer

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!