19.01.2015 Views

April Journal-2009.p65 - Association of Biotechnology and Pharmacy

April Journal-2009.p65 - Association of Biotechnology and Pharmacy

April Journal-2009.p65 - Association of Biotechnology and Pharmacy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Current Trends in <strong>Biotechnology</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pharmacy</strong><br />

Vol. 3 (2) 188-196, <strong>April</strong> 2009. ISSN 0973-8916<br />

A-HCl is well absorbed after oral<br />

administration with peak plasma concentrations<br />

in 1 to 2 hours after a dose. Bioavailability is about<br />

94% in poor metabolisers but only 63% in<br />

extensive metabolisers. Atomoxetine is<br />

metabolized primarily via the cytochrome P450<br />

isoenzyme CYP2D6 to the active metabolite 4-<br />

hydroxyatomoxetine; a minority <strong>of</strong> the population<br />

are poor metabolisers <strong>and</strong> experience plasma<br />

concentrations about 5 times those in extensive<br />

metabolisers. The half life <strong>of</strong> atomoxetine is about<br />

5.2 hours in extensive <strong>and</strong> 21.6 in poor<br />

metabolisers (9). A-HCl due to its low therapeutic<br />

dose (10-100 mg) <strong>and</strong> substantial<br />

biotransformation in liver becomes it ideal<br />

c<strong>and</strong>idate for design <strong>and</strong> development <strong>of</strong><br />

transdermal therapeutic system. A-HCl in<br />

transdermal formulations provides sustained blood<br />

levels over a prolonged period, which is required<br />

for control <strong>of</strong> ADHD.<br />

In spite <strong>of</strong> several advantages <strong>of</strong>fered by<br />

transdermal route, only a few drug molecules are<br />

administered transdermally because the<br />

formidable barrier nature <strong>of</strong> stratum corneum.<br />

Two major approaches to increase transdermal<br />

permeation rate include physical techniques<br />

(iontophoresis, electroporation, sonophoresis, <strong>and</strong><br />

microneedles) <strong>and</strong> use <strong>of</strong> chemical penetration<br />

enhancers (PE) such as solvents, surfactants,<br />

fatty acids, <strong>and</strong> terpenes.<br />

Propylene glycol (PG) is the most commonly<br />

used pharmaceutical excipients <strong>and</strong> have been<br />

widely employed to enhance the transdermal flux<br />

<strong>of</strong> many drugs (10-14). Various mechanisms <strong>of</strong><br />

action have been attributed to the PG for its<br />

penetration enhancement capabilities such as<br />

increased thermodynamic activity (15), increased<br />

skin/vehicle partitioning <strong>of</strong> the drug (16), <strong>and</strong><br />

alteration <strong>of</strong> barrier property by interacting with<br />

skin components. PG may reduce barrier property<br />

<strong>of</strong> skin by causing conformational changes either<br />

in lipid acryl chains (17) or protein domains (18)<br />

or by partial lipid extractions (19).<br />

189<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> this study was to formulate<br />

transdermal patches <strong>of</strong> A-HCl <strong>and</strong> to evaluate<br />

the effect <strong>of</strong> PG in drug release.<br />

Materials <strong>and</strong> Methods<br />

Materials<br />

Atomoxetine HCl, Eudragit RL 100 (ERL)<br />

(Rohm Pharma GmbH, Germany) <strong>and</strong> Eudragit<br />

RS 100 (ERS) (Rohm Pharma GmbH, Germany)<br />

were procured from Aurobindo Pharmaceuticals<br />

(Hyderabad, India). Liquid mercury, dibutyl<br />

phthalate (DBP), hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose<br />

(HPMC), propylene glycol (PG), disodium<br />

hydrogen phosphate, potassium dihydrogen<br />

phosphate, sodium chloride were purchased from<br />

S.D. Fine Chemicals Limited, India. All the<br />

materials used were <strong>of</strong> analytical grade.<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> TDDS<br />

The composition <strong>of</strong> various formulations is<br />

given in Table 1. The polymeric solution (10% w/<br />

v) was prepared by dissolving ERL-100/ ERS-<br />

100 <strong>and</strong> HPMC in different ratios, along with A-<br />

HCl, DBP <strong>and</strong> PG in ethanol. The solution was<br />

poured into a glass ring placed on the surface <strong>of</strong><br />

liquid mercury kept in a petridish. The solvent<br />

was allowed to evaporate under ambient<br />

conditions (temperature 32 0 C <strong>and</strong> relative humidity<br />

45%) for 24 hours. Aluminum foil was used as<br />

backing film. The polymer was found to be self<br />

sticking due to the presence <strong>of</strong> eudragit polymers<br />

along with plasticizer. The patches were cut to<br />

give required area <strong>and</strong> stored in airtight container<br />

till further use.<br />

Physicochemical Evaluation<br />

Thickness <strong>and</strong> Weight Variation<br />

The thickness <strong>of</strong> the patches was<br />

assessed at 6 different points using screw gauze.<br />

For each formulation, three r<strong>and</strong>omly selected<br />

patches were used. For weight variation test, 3<br />

films from each batch were weighed individually<br />

<strong>and</strong> the average weight was calculated (Table<br />

2).<br />

Mamatha et al

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!